Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Producing a million of the Edition Watch makes it much less appealing. At $4,000+ I can entirely understand if it was a limited run but for a mass-produced timepiece I would rather buy a standard Watch and invest the rest in a Rolex-level brand.

Although speculatively if the report is correct I believe the price may surprise at well under $3,000 at that quantity. A million watches per month at $4,000 does not seem realistic to me, even for Apple.

agreed. That seems a little ridiculous to think a million edition watches will be sold total, let alone initially shipped.
 
There will obviously be people who are so rich that the Apple Watch Gold Edition will simply be as expensive as a cup of coffee. Therefore they probably won't mind buying it using it however they want.

What I do wonder though is the longevity of these devices. A new product from Apple will generally not last very long in terms of smoothness and usability when it's been updated to one or two new OS-versions. I do wonder if Apple will use the same kind of business model for these watches like the iPhone and iPad that get updated yearly. After all, the first iPhones and iPads felt pretty obsolete since Apple made such advancements early on for both products, whereas I feel they've really matured at this point.

I guess people somehow might expect the watch to have longer longevity, but since it's technically not only a watch at this point I might be wrong. I guess it would be easier to somehow "accept" the fact that an Apple Watch that's between 350-500 dollars might feel obsolete pretty quickly, but the gold editions? I don't know.
 
Its just a wearable, even if you have 4K, its a digital watch......
 
no way they are pricing the stainless steel at more than $599. A $100-$200 premium over the sport is more like it.

I think they will because showing off a time piece on your arm is a thing of "ego" so the price of it makes it something that is bling bling. For the "peasants" there is the cheap apple watch.
 
Too

Too bad no one is going to upgrade the gold edition every year, at most replace the central watch but keep the rest. This is another product that - like the current iPad - lacks sustenance.
 
For a device a little more powerful than the AppleTV and less functional than iPod touch, it should be priced accordingly. $249 entry level and i'd be in line on launch day. $349...it's just above my instant-buy threshold. I have to think about it.

I would tend to agree here. But I'm more on the fence regardless. I feel that even though I want to purchase one around launch day, I'm afraid that the watch will loose it's appeal after about six months. Especially considering that I really don't wear watches; and the watches I do have basically just sit at home.
 
I hate to break it to many posters who think that the $4,000 watch competes with a Rolex. You aren't getting into a new Rolex for under $7k and that is for a 36mm stainless which looks like a woman's watch on most men.

To get into a new Rolex you are likely going to spend $10,000ish (on the extreme low end) or 2.5x the cost of an Apple watch.
 
Please could someone explain the logic of buying a gold/precious metal watch that will be out of date in 2 years??
 
I think they will because showing off a time piece on your arm is a thing of "ego" so the price of it makes it something that is bling bling. For the "peasants" there is the cheap apple watch.

I agree with that, but at the end of the day it is a smartwatch. It will probably be updated every single year. They have their premium product with the Edition. They have the entry level model, but they don't want to price stainless steel out of the market.
 
I agree with that, but at the end of the day it is a smartwatch. It will probably be updated every single year. They have their premium product with the Edition. They have the entry level model, but they don't want to price stainless steel out of the market.

I wonder how many will rationalise it by "well it still tells the date and time"

and is that something apple is banking on?
 
I predict free product upgrade/exchange for at least four years on the $4000 model and at least one year on the $1000 model. What I mean is that with apple watch 2 or 3 or 4 comes out owners of the $4000 watch can walk in to any Apple store and exchange their watch for the new watch, for free.
 
Please could someone explain the logic of buying a gold/precious metal watch that will be out of date in 2 years??

Sure.

The fact that everyone knows it will be out of the date in 2 years make it even more of an extravagant purchase. People who will buy it will send the message "I have so much money, I don't even mind spending it on something with a short lifespan". For people who want to show off their status, sometimes a worse value has a higher value to them. It seems like a contradiction, but that's often how it works in the high-end luxury market.

See: Veblen good.
 
I wonder how many will rationalise it by "well it still tells the date and time"

and is that something apple is banking on?

Won't the battery hold less than a day's charge after a year or so anyway?
 
20thanniversary.png
 
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]

Apple Watch will start at $349 for the entry-level Sport model, while pricing information for the other two models has not been confirmed.
Article Link: Apple Watch Revenue Will Likely Be Dominated by Expensive Gold Edition

pricing goes like this

entry watch------$349
stainless watch--$1000
gold watch-------$4000

no way they are pricing the stainless steel at more than $599. A $100-$200 premium over the sport is more like it.

While it hasn't been publicly confirmed, I have friends that work at Apple who have already gone through the training for it. They have all stated that the Apple Watch is the entry model at $349, (The one with stainless steel/ sapphire display cover). The sports model is the middle of the road model. I know it should be taken with a grain of salt, but there is no reason as to why I wouldn't believe them.
 
Possible apple service update for gold watch.

I'll bet you Apple will offer a "return/update" service for the gold watches. You send your watch in, and they replace it with a new one for the offset cost. Most of the value comes from the gold so returning the gold and then the upgrade and handling fee would make sense - ahhh somewhat.

Also, I think the idea of a Gold Apple watch is against the company philosophy. It's not something I could have seen Jobs ever agreeing with, even if people want it - The whole idea behind the company has always been affordable lux and high quality for the average person. Oh well, let's see where things go.
 
I predict free product upgrade/exchange for at least four years on the $4000 model and at least one year on the $1000 model. What I mean is that with apple watch 2 or 3 or 4 comes out owners of the $4000 watch can walk in to any Apple store and exchange their watch for the new watch, for free.

nah not a chance. I wouldn't do that. Would you offer that if it were your business?

you can pay for the upgrade but i wouldn't offer it for free as in i'll take it back giving you a discount on the new version and sell the old one as a second hand watch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.