Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The future of Apple is wearables,

You need to call somebody, check your notification or send a short text, you will use the Apple Watch.

Do you want to do more serious reading, more serious writing, searching the web, buy articles online, playing games or work in your area profissional software you will use augmented reality glasses.

Think about it, throught your airpods Siri tells you John1 is calling and you answer the call throught your Apple Watch.

John1, tells you he is going to send you the new design for the motorcycle he is working on.

The call finishes...

You ask Siri to send a mensage to John2 saying that John 1 sent you the design, and that you will revise It and then forward it to him.

While Siri sends the mensage to john2 throught Apple Watch 6, you take your Apple Glasses from your shirt pocket and put them on.

Then have an augmented reality UI that surrounds you.

Siri says you have received a new file from John, you open it and there you go you see the motorcycle right in front of you, It looks cool, and you forward It.

As wearables displace Iphones, IPads will get their shiny years. Slimmer and slimmer they will become foldable displays, that you may bring with you as a little magic book.

You're living in sci-fi fantasy land. Like most sci-fi, these kinds of things will eventually happen, but not any time soon. The biggest, most glaring problem is all of this requires VOICE CONTROL, which no one wants to use out in public. Even worse would be gesture control where you wave your hands around in the air like a crazy person. Nobody wants to dictate an intimate text message to Siri in public, or some business secret information into an email, or some teenager gossiping at the dinner table with their parents. And people don't want to look like cyborgs with gadgets all over their bodies.

A phone screen is small, private, and easy to put away when you're not using it. This meets the vast majority of people's needs already.
 
If you had said the future will be displays-on-glasses... projecting a virtual desktop in front of my eyes... I could imagine that.

But a 1.5" screen on my wrist doesn't sound like a fun future.

I wouldn't want to read your 221 word comment on an Apple Watch... and I wouldn't want Siri to read it to me aloud either. :)

Displays will still be a part of computing for quite some time. And there's a limit to how small a display can be and still be comfortable and enjoyable.

Paradigms don't change that much. :p

You're right... some people have a phone as their only device. They don't even own a computer. And that can work well enough.

Phones have a good balance of screen size and portability. Smaller than a laptop... but still visually rich. In fact... most of the web and plenty of entertainment are now viewed on phone-sized screens.

But an even tinier watch? Instead of a phone? I'm not seein' it.

It all comes back to screen size.

Even as voice-assistants get better and better... you still have LOOK at stuff quite often. And you'll have to type more than a couple words at a time. Siri also won't help with pictures and video. Tiny watch screens don't make any of that stuff better.

You said people can live without a laptop and rely on only a phone. And I agree.

But let's see how many people can live without a phone and rely on only a smartwatch.

Masochists :D

Again, you’re making the mistake of transposing today’s reality on to a future that has invented other conventions and other types of applications to suit the devices of the day.

Pre-2007, the Internet was a World Wide Web thing, viewed primarily through a browser. Skip forward a decade, and the internet is accessed primarily through apps, though browsers are still used for sites like this one that are from an early web and have remained popular.

Yet, the browser experience has been modified to perfectly suit a touch enabled small screen, something that those living in 2007 would have decried as an inferior experience because they haven’t yet seen a web built for mobile.

Most people in that world would have called future people like you and me masochists for typing out long posts like yours and mine on a virtual screen keyboard.

Of course screens will still exist. Pocket sized tablets (like today’s iPhone) will become secondary devices that you can take with you if you choose but that aren’t critical to your computer needs. Your own personal computer assistant will be the one that you have on your wrist at all times and you’ll interact with it as if you had a super smart human assistant following you around everywhere you go: through conversation.

I expect wearable tech to take on the primary computer role with accessories like glasses giving users access to the web overlaid on the real world through AR. “Forums” of the future could be friends (real or virtual) in your city leaving comments on real world objects. The MacRumors of a future where AR is king hasn’t been invented yet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mousesuck
You're living in sci-fi fantasy land. Like most sci-fi, these kinds of things will eventually happen, but not any time soon. The biggest, most glaring problem is all of this requires VOICE CONTROL, which no one wants to use out in public. Even worse would be gesture control where you wave your hands around in the air like a crazy person. Nobody wants to dictate an intimate text message to Siri in public, or some business secret information into an email, or some teenager gossiping at the dinner table with their parents. And people don't want to look like cyborgs with gadgets all over their bodies.

A phone screen is small, private, and easy to put away when you're not using it. This meets the vast majority of people's needs already.

You forgot, "hey you kids, get off of my lawn!"
 
You're living in sci-fi fantasy land. Like most sci-fi, these kinds of things will eventually happen, but not any time soon.

In case you haven’t noticed it, you’re living in sci-fi fantasy land right now. We carry all the knowledge of the world in super computers that fit in our pockets. Tell that to someone from not too long ago.

A phone screen is small, private, and easy to put away when you're not using it. This meets the vast majority of people's needs already.

Someone in 1997 would tell you, a laptop screen is small, is private and easy to put away when you’re not using it. Because their comparison was to desktop computers.

You’re severely underestimating how fast technology moves forward and how quickly it changes everything.
[doublepost=1503011147][/doublepost]
But smartphones haven't replaced laptops. Smartphones are a new tool in the toolbox, not a replacement.

Maybe they haven’t for you but they have for many. The examples are plenty in the personal use world where people who didn’t use a computer in their work but had a PC for home use no longer need one. Pocket computers manage their email and messages, their Facebook use, their photos, their calendars, their web use and even light word processing (everybody seemed to have Word back in the day).

In the business world, I know a lot of realtors for example, most of which have replaced their laptops with smart phones where they check their emails, update their home listings and communicate with their clients. All of those realtors, without fail had to have a laptop with them at all time to do their work. They no longer do.

Myself, I’m a photographer. I had to have a laptop at a lot of my shoots that required client input or where I had to edit and deliver finished photos on location. Today, I sync my camera to my iPhone, and do my editing and client samples on the spot. At home, I use my iPad for the brunt work of editing. I no longer own a laptop.

All that to say that the world changes quickly. What some people consider indispensable today, can be replaced by things you can’t imagine being useful. The mistake that many people make is transposing today’s reality and conventions to a future that will have developed other conventions and a different reality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mousesuck
You're living in sci-fi fantasy land. Like most sci-fi, these kinds of things will eventually happen, but not any time soon. The biggest, most glaring problem is all of this requires VOICE CONTROL, which no one wants to use out in public. Even worse would be gesture control where you wave your hands around in the air like a crazy person. Nobody wants to dictate an intimate text message to Siri in public, or some business secret information into an email, or some teenager gossiping at the dinner table with their parents. And people don't want to look like cyborgs with gadgets all over their bodies.

A phone screen is small, private, and easy to put away when you're not using it. This meets the vast majority of people's needs already.

You just wrote a bunch of social and technological problems that you believe are hard to solve and put them together without any or almost no argumentation supporting there unsolvable nature.

Your line of thinking is flawed, you really didn’t add anything of relevance.

1. If the problem is privacy, there is nothing more private than something only you can see...only you can see the information displayed on your augmented reality world unless you share It.

2. If the problem is that you don’t want to dictate in public your personal mensages or emails, as you do today you will be able to type them with your fingers.
Except that instead of typing on a touch screen you may type in any surface you see convenient, since augmented reality can be use to project an anchored real sized/whatever sized keyboard in every surface...be it a desk, your kitchen table, the floor or your foreharm.
The thing to keep in mind is that if you do want to dictate a mensage to Siri, in 10 years I can assure you that it will work flawlessly, fluently and you won’t feel like a jerk which is the real problem you are talking about. Good voice recognition is just like talking to somebody on your cellphone and that wouldn’t be strange, at least if you are not using the speakerphone.

3. If the problem is that you want a big screen, augmented reality will give you a screen the size you want and the number of screens you want.
You look to the front and a screen the size of a wall is just there...or maybe you just want a little screen the size of an IPad or an IPhone floating at your belly level.
Maybe you want hundred screens around you, you can have it.
So obviously there is that capability, but screens are just a way of reproduction of 2D content.
Contrary to 2D content, Augmented reality surrounds you...so the Internet,digital art, cinema, porn, photography and tv will adapt to this new constructs. Even AR screens will feel outdated when webpages are not design for them but as 3d environments. That being said if you want them you can have them.

4. Gesture control, waving the hands in the air may look crazy today, 4 years ago so did using an handsfree speaker to make calls, which everybody uses right now.
Besides gestures don’t have to be particularly expansive to work.

For example last year google presented there project, Soli.
A miniaturize radar embedded on a clock (Apple watch why not?).
The radar detects with extrem precision and sensibility, the movements of your other hand fingers moving in the air near the clock.
From there they created a bunch of comfortable, gentle and discreet micro gesture, with which you manipulate 3d virtual objects.
The equivalent to multitouch in the air.

5. Apple augmented reality glasses would function as a door to a new world, Apple Watch, as a permanent conection to that world even when you are not there.
Apple Watch as an notification hub, quick mensage and calling, Siri interaction and gesture input.
Their power, impact and pure coolness will be in a total different league than the iphone could ever be. While maintaining a small form factor, and even more portability since they are wearables.

Apple Watch and Apple glasses (in 10 years) will be just as easy to put away as your Iphone.
The AW obviously already is and the AR glasses in 15 years or less, will have the same form factor of the glasses from Ray-ban which is really easy to put away if you want.

6.People may not want to look like cyborgs with gadget all over there bodys.
On the other side, externally there is nothing cyberpunk about wearing an Apple Watch and some Ray-ban looking glasses.

7. I’m leaving in a fantasy? If I’m
leaving in a fantasy world, google, Microsoft, Apple, the tech gurus and economists are all living in a fantasy world.
We are already living in a goddam fantasy world compared to 20 years ago.

8. You say that smartphones meet the needs of the vast majority.
I agree. So did slavery, horse carriages, forced labor, coal, petrol, telegrams, Mail, beeps, cellphones and so do smartphones...of course that doesn’t matter, the internet replaced the newspaper even if the needs of the vast majority were satisfied.

9. At the end your only argument of relavance is when? Since you don’t think it will happen on your lifetime.
As the Iphone took ten years to get to the pinacle of what it can offer so will wearables.

AW was lauched 3 years ago, Augmented reality glasses will be lauched in the next year or so.
Ten years is a lot for that technology to mature to the product I just described.
 
Last edited:
It's hard for me to be excited about LTE support right in Apple Watch when it's so hard to use it as a communications device. I have decent hearing, but even light environmental noise makes it really difficult to hear... and often, the person on the other side gets broken audio (I experience this myself when my wife answers my call on her Series 2).

I really don't understand this reasoning. Are we still in 2015?

USE AIRPODS.

If we can use Watch to call someone, it will be much better experience than iPhone. Why?
"Hey Siri, Call my wife." and Siri will never say "Please unlock your phone" back again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hank moody
Pointless to have cellular radio built in if you can't make or take a basic call for times when, for example, you go for a jog but want to leave the phone behind and still be able to make emergency calls on the watch. It's such a simple function that makes me think it's a patent issue rather than a technical one because Samsung and LG have had watch call capability for years now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koigirl
I really don't understand this reasoning. Are we still in 2015?

USE AIRPODS.

If we can use Watch to call someone, it will be much better experience than iPhone. Why?
"Hey Siri, Call my wife." and Siri will never say "Please unlock your phone" back again.

Agree.

And in the long term Watch will be the epitome of  products.
You wont need an object the size of an iPhone always with you.

Watch will be our personal "phone". Everything else will be dumb screens to when we need bigger screens.
 
I really don't understand this reasoning. Are we still in 2015?

USE AIRPODS.

If we can use Watch to call someone, it will be much better experience than iPhone. Why?
"Hey Siri, Call my wife." and Siri will never say "Please unlock your phone" back again.

And I am pretty sure Bluetooth headsets have existed long before 2015.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.