I think the sensor is still in there, they just disabled its use. I think the IP issue was all with how the data was read and the software used to calculate it all.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Ultra 3 Launching This September: What to Expect
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I'm looking at upgrading my Series 7 watch this year. The Ultra seems interesting but I think it's too big for me.
Aside from that though, I'm not sure I'd get much use out of the extra features it can do. I just need a day-to-day watch and like it for all of the health tracking. Plus the Ultra is about twice the price as a regular Apple Watch.
Aside from that though, I'm not sure I'd get much use out of the extra features it can do. I just need a day-to-day watch and like it for all of the health tracking. Plus the Ultra is about twice the price as a regular Apple Watch.
Incremental update to the prior version Apple Watch Ultra as far as I am concerned I will be just keeping my ultra 2 with blood oxygen sensor that works. I figure that I can easily get a couple more years before I do a trade in
Thought blood pressure monitoring still wasn't allowed due to ongoing lawsuit from a patent holder.
So I guess AT&T and Verizon will officially launch 5G standalone later this year, if this watch does have 5G redcap (which AT&T claimed they support nationwide now).
I'm sure Apple is working on it (as are numerous other companies) because it will be a windfall if they can get it right. But detecting the amount of sugar in your blood through the back of a watch is a very tough nut to crack. In your whole bloodstream there is only about a tsp of sugar (100 mg/dl x 10dl/l x 5l = 5000mg = 5 g = 1 tsp), the amount in a few cubic mm of skin is almost none.
As someone rocking an AW 6 sapphire glass, I've been feeling this way recently. Ive debated going to a regular watch just because there are so many different styles out there. These days everyone has the same black square on their wrist and its becoming a bit stale IMO. The Ultra was able to change that a little bit and why it had my interest.
5 years from now you will have your wish and in 2 years the blood oxygen will return.
I have the original Ultra that I was considering updating when the Ultra 3 came out. But because Apple just gave a second chance to put my Ultra in AppleCare with AppleCare One, and I don’t want to lose the blood oxygen capability, update will probably wait.
The Ultra 1 and Ultra 2 already have this. They're unlikely to go backwards on battery life.
5 day would be an insta-buy for me though.
This might be the one I'll upgrade to from my Series 5 Titanium.
Who else is amazed that a wrist-worn device can communicate with satellites 500 to 2000 km above our heads?
Lets talk when apple watch will have the same battery life as garmin
What about the companion starship and crew??? "Beam me up, Scotty!"
Apple is so out of touch. /s
Let's talk Garmin when they have the same features and integration as Apple Watches.
Do you think that Apple is artificially restricting battery life? If they could get a 7-day runtime, don't you think they'd do that? This is a physics limit, not a business decision. The needed battery tech doesn't exist yet.
What use is the great hardware?
The biggest construction site is still watchOS.
It lacks sports metrics a la Garmin Training Readiness! The Apple Watch has so much data thanks to the good sensors and does absolutely nothing with it!
And what really annoys me:
1. You do a running session on the treadmill,
treadmill and Apple Watch show different distances.
Now I want to correct the distance displayed on the AW or on the iPhone.
And that doesn't work in the year 2025 with Apple!
Just crazy.
2. assigning running units to running shoes/equipment.... doesn't work either.
Hello 2025!
3. night mode and precision start only for the Ultra?
Why this artificial OS castration of the normal AW?
Garmin can do it all on my FR 265.
Please Apple, focus watchOS 27 COMPLETELY on sports only.
The biggest construction site is still watchOS.
It lacks sports metrics a la Garmin Training Readiness! The Apple Watch has so much data thanks to the good sensors and does absolutely nothing with it!
And what really annoys me:
1. You do a running session on the treadmill,
treadmill and Apple Watch show different distances.
Now I want to correct the distance displayed on the AW or on the iPhone.
And that doesn't work in the year 2025 with Apple!
Just crazy.
2. assigning running units to running shoes/equipment.... doesn't work either.
Hello 2025!
3. night mode and precision start only for the Ultra?
Why this artificial OS castration of the normal AW?
Garmin can do it all on my FR 265.
Please Apple, focus watchOS 27 COMPLETELY on sports only.
Same. Should be quite the upgrade. Mine is showing serious signs of aging now.
The new iPhones also have satellite connectivity so I think the need for it in a watch is more niche/unique
Apple always overpromises but under delivers! Apple Watch innovation is right up there with Siri.
I fondly hope that Apple starts integrating Red and Near-Infrared instrumentation into their devices; the Ultra 3 is as good a place as any to start with that. In 2024, scientist Glen Jeffery noted that [Red] Light stimulation of mitochondria reduces blood sugar levels. This summer he published a paper in Nature noting that Longer wavelengths in sunlight pass through the human body and have a systemic impact which improves vision. Light in this part of the spectrum is crucial to our metabolism. Apple is uniquely positioned to encourage users to get abundant light in this part of the spectrum: a fourth fitness ring.
The importance of this kind of monitoring has increased over the years. The paper "Melatonin and the optics of the human body" (2019) notes that "efficient" LED bulbs and IR-filtering windows have removed more than 80% of indoor Red/NIR light. That's why monitoring/measuring this spectrum of light is so #!$$ important!
I hope that Apple has years' worth of clinical data on the health benefits of Red/NIR. I fondly hope they're able to completely market and immerse us into this technology. We all win, because monitoring this is crucial to our health.
This will never happen. It’s insane people think that what countless diabetes companies can’t do Apple is magically going to figure out. This was rumored years ago, and they say it is “years” away. It isn’t happening.