I will say it again, the metrics AW collects have been invaluable for me. All I need to do is wear the AW.
Where? Don't get me wrong, I use Apple and I like it, but I can't be blind. Apple is in the deep woods when it comes to fitness. Garmin is eons ahead of them. Even Gentler.app is a hell of a lot better than what comes out of the box with the Apple Watch. The rings may have been cool, but they're so 2000 and late now. Adaptive workout prompts and adaptive goals are what I would expect from a trillion dollar company that has more money than Gentler and Garmin. I know I can manually, I know there's a weekly recap and a new goal. If I ran a marathon today because I felt like it, then the next day's goal should be nothing or something like that. Apple's first suggestion should be "rest."Similar to afib detection?
I like where apple is going into the health and fitness space.
I actually haven't heard that it runs out in four years. If so, that's good news for anyone buying AW up to that point. Especially because most don't upgrade so often since AWs don't change so much between cycles. I have the Series 8 and if I buy the Series 14 or so anyway, then it's as if nothing ever happened. Obviously many people's upgrade cycle WILL be affected, but it's better than an indefinite feature axe like I thought until they somehow resolve the dispute.Yeah, lack of oximetry really hampers any health app that Apple is promoting at this time. My advice pay the licensing fee. They’re only four years left on Massimo’s patent so pony up the money and let’s go..
I think metrics of metabolic variability are great, and I'm sure they've been well-researched. At the same time, the real red flag in this story is someone who got sick (a cold?) about two times [during the WatchOS beta period]. What was their latest test results for blood levels of Vitamin D? Were they at 60ng/mL, or 20ng/mL? It's great to have the Apple Watch measure vitality, but no device will be able to measure billionths of a gram of Vitamin D in our blood non-invasively. The peril of emphasizing a wearable for preventative health is the things it cannot possibly measure.I will say it again, the metrics AW collects have been invaluable for me. All I need to do is wear the AW.
They are still very much still in litigation.Has there been any news on the blood oxygen sensor support? It seems so odd Apple wouldn't try to appeal this case, or license the patents involved.
I wonder if not enough users have been clamoring for this and the ban hasn't affected sales, so Apple might just be letting it go. Pretty sad if so.
I don’t care about my vitamin D levels, I can get a blood test. But I realized how important AW was recovering from an accident with neck and head injury. Pretty much most of the stuff my neurologist wanted, AW was tracking. This is not a blood test but kind of like early warning, or see the trend of a treatment or over all well being. It’s not a medical device to do invasive procedures.I think metrics of metabolic variability are great, and I'm sure they've been well-researched. At the same time, the real red flag in this story is someone who got sick (a cold?) about two times [during the WatchOS beta period]. What was their latest test results for blood levels of Vitamin D? Were they at 60ng/mL, or 20ng/mL? It's great to have the Apple Watch measure vitality, but no device will be able to measure billionths of a gram of Vitamin D in our blood non-invasively. The peril of emphasizing a wearable for preventative health is the things it cannot possibly measure.
That may be the case, but there’s definitely truth to the fact that your vitals begin changing before the onset of symptoms. How far in advance and to what degree all depend on the person and the illness, but you can’t just completely discredit this, even if the experiences are anecdotal.
I'm pretty sure you shouldn't need a device to tell you to take rest after running a marathon. The AW is a smart watch first and tries to be general fintess tracker. I had a whoop for a couple years and it really didn't give that much more insight, then my AW and it whole goal was rest/strain/recovery. I know when I over do it and when I need to push myself.Where? Don't get me wrong, I use Apple and I like it, but I can't be blind. Apple is in the deep woods when it comes to fitness. Garmin is eons ahead of them. Even Gentler.app is a hell of a lot better than what comes out of the box with the Apple Watch. The rings may have been cool, but they're so 2000 and late now. Adaptive workout prompts and adaptive goals are what I would expect from a trillion dollar company that has more money than Gentler and Garmin. I know I can manually, I know there's a weekly recap and a new goal. If I ran a marathon today because I felt like it, then the next day's goal should be nothing or something like that. Apple's first suggestion should be "rest."
I charge mine during my morning routine (shower, face, teeth etc) and then in my evening routine before I hit the bed. It's more than enough.This is an interesting option but when are you supposed to charge your watch? I need it charged and ready to go for the day first thing in the morning.
This might work, but right now, this is an article about two users having confirmation bias.
This is nothing new, the Whoops were detecting covid infections before you knew it. This was published long ago, it's just tracking your data and saying when out of range, apple just cloned whoop.
I was surprised at this, as well.
A couple weeks back, my Vitals app showed my overnight / resting heartbeat up from my normal 50 to close to 60, my temperature up 1 degree from normal, etc. I was feeling fine. The next night, same thing, but I woke up with a sore throat and chest congestion - start of a cold.
After the first couple of days of the cold, vitals went back to normal as the cold played itself out (miserably).
As this is the ONLY time I've ever seen the vitals deviate from normal, convinced this is 100% correlated with the illness.
You should have a goal to nomally your sleep, the AW can help you with that. You can also set different schedules for different days of the week.This is great and all, but Apple Watch still has a lot of work to do in order to truly correctly detect sleep outside of the normal sleep schedule. We are not robots and we have naps at any moment. The watch does not detect them at all. Even if you sleep in late one morning, the sleep detection will stop at the alarm/deactivation of your sleeping schedule. It's ridiculous for a watch that hypes itself so much on this feature in particular. Evidently, the Vitals will be affected by this mess and will give an anomaly/outlier for your sleep.