Finally.... Our long, national nightmare is over.
Really, nightmare? No one beyond these geek forums probably know about this, and even many of the people on here probably could care less what happens. But if this be sarcasm, then + 1
Finally.... Our long, national nightmare is over.
Really, nightmare? No one beyond these geek forums probably know about this, and even many of the people on here probably could care less what happens. But if this be sarcasm, then + 1
Isn't it obvious who the backer was? It was Steve Jobs.
He needed to created a fake company and use that company to create new law that favors him, in the unlikely case that someone started to sell Mac clones.
Isn't it obvious who the backer was? It was Steve Jobs.
He needed to created a fake company and use that company to create new law that favors him, in the unlikely case that someone started to sell Mac clones.
You're right on the latter.Really, nightmare? No one beyond these geek forums probably know about this, and even many of the people on here probably could care less what happens. But if this be sarcasm, then + 1
In fact, this makes me want to watch Frost/Nixon again.You're too young to recognize the reference?
Yeah, all 781 of them that Psystar sold.Didn't anyone at Apple get anything resembling the following from all of this?
"Gee, maybe some of our customers want a mid-range mini-tower."
Nope, never, whatever. I'll keep using my Core2Quad hackintosh until they wake up. It goes nicely with my actual Macs, but doesn't replace any of them.
Didn't anyone at Apple get anything resembling the following from all of this?
"Gee, maybe some of our customers want a mid-range mini-tower."
Out of curiosity do you side with Apple or Nokia in their lawsuit.
Isn't it obvious who the backer was? It was Steve Jobs.
He needed to created a fake company and use that company to create new law that favors him, in the unlikely case that someone started to sell Mac clones.
That is such a preposterous claim, it just might be true!
Except there is no "new law" being created here.
No idea 'ay? They had millions though... enough to mount some pretty high-level court cases across multiple states, and also to keep manufacturing, marketing and presumably selling machines (despite not making a cent from their company.)
My guess is that somebody must have helped them...
No idea 'ay? They had millions though... enough to mount some pretty high-level court cases across multiple states, and also to keep manufacturing, marketing and presumably selling machines (despite not making a cent from their company.)
My guess is that somebody must have helped them...
All this does is prevent Psystar from copying OSX or modifying OSX (i.e. copyright, not anti-trust). How does that mean "the end" of Psystar or anything else? It only deals with them modifying OSX early on. I really think these articles jump to conclusions.
No. The injunction prevents them from inducing, contributing to, or having anything to do with installing OS X on non Apple computers.
In other words, Psystar's entire raison d'etre.