that is my understanding, and I guess they will use their "software fix" in that, obviously not a guarantee of successI believe they can appeal the ban next week, but had to wait for the presidential dateline to pass?
that is my understanding, and I guess they will use their "software fix" in that, obviously not a guarantee of successI believe they can appeal the ban next week, but had to wait for the presidential dateline to pass?
There seems to be a misunderstanding about what this means. From what I read, Apple will not be able to replace these devices out of warranty until the ban is lifted. If you have AC+, you will be covered like normal. If you don’t have AC+, I would absolutely try to get it immediately as a precaution. I think you can also continue to renew if you’re at the end of your current coverage (not positive though).
Stole IP and hired away staff after showing partnership/acquistion interest (to learn inside details)
Please don't defend Apple on this
Sneaky Tim Cook, getting me to get AC+ on my new Series 9. Had the Series 6 with no issues and initially had planned to skip AC+ again.
I bought mine without Apple care from Amazon which hasn’t been delivered yet can I get Apple care after it’s been delivered on the 28th?
Stole IP and hired away staff after showing partnership/acquistion interest (to learn inside details)
Please don't defend Apple on this
It’s apple’s fault for infringing a patent and for failing to settle this dispute. You can be 101% sure if another company was infringing an Apple patent apple would go nuclear on them.
So you're going to sue the U.S. government as they are the ones that issued the order. Anyway what would we get, a $5 Apple Card?They’ve been raked over the coals their entire existence and have been through pundit declared disasters as well. They’ve always been able to withstand it. They don’t care about what the nerd herd thinks.
But I do smell a class action over not being able to get your Ultra 2 replaced. That’s why I think there will be a resolution sooner than later. It’s all a chess game and brinksmanship at this point.
How do you repair a banned item?So most people that have an original Ultra without Apple care are SOL. Kinda glad I traded in my Ultra 1 for a 2. Wonder how this effects states with "right to repair" law?
Louis Rossmann is gonna have a field day with this
It would require Masimo being willing to sell.They should just buy Masimo.
It’s up to you, but I would get it just in case. You could go month-to-month, assuming that it works in this scenario — and I’m not sure if you can move from month-to-month to annual. If you can, this might be a good temporary plan.Sneaky Tim Cook, getting me to get AC+ on my new Series 9. Had the Series 6 with no issues and initially had planned to skip AC+ again.
Hostile takeover; armed patent infringing watches at the ready troops!It would require Masimo being willing to sell.
Rossmann is an idiot and effectively more entertainer than anything else these days. His videos are ALL whiny complaining about anything he can think of. His channel is trash.Louis Rossmann is gonna have a field day with this
Rossmann is an idiot and effectively more entertainer than anything else these days. His videos are ALL whiny complaining about anything he can think of. His channel is trash.
People love dogging Apple whenever possible, but take for granted that they depend on their products. If you agree with the lawsuit, then agree with there being no Apple Watch, repair service or don’t complain when the price of the watch either soars or comes back to market without life saving technology included. The lawsuit is really against those who want an Apple Watch, not just Apple.
I've been paying AC+ monthly on my Ultra 1 ($4.99), just because it's extremely expensive to repair if something were to go wrong with this. I was going to cancel this Jan 1, but I just may keep it going instead.Sneaky Tim Cook, getting me to get AC+ on my new Series 9. Had the Series 6 with no issues and initially had planned to skip AC+ again.
Yeah, Masimo is totally to blame for Apple infringing its patents.All the blame lies with Masimo on this. The bulk of these patents (15 of 17) have been invalidated by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and when it went to trial Apple had all but one juror agreeing with them (which meant it was declared a mistrial). Even the ITC wasn't unanimous on this ban decision.
Apple is also suing Masimo for their W1 watch, stating that Masimo has used these lawsuits to gain access to source code and confidential information which they then used to develop their own device.
Everyone can think this is Apple being a bully, but it sure reads different when you see the actual facts.
So is it set to 1923, cause many of them had the y2k bug.Over 2 decades and my Casio is still working.