Could God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it?
Could God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it?
???Think other way, if indeed Apple created unhackable software, jailbreak will be impossible and it won't be fun.
Actually Apple is proving how clever they are. Maximizing the free publicity, they understand how gullible some people can be. Believing every word Apple speaks, the devotees are lapping this up. Make no mistake, the Apple Marketing Machine is very effective.Wow, apple is hardcore. I like it.
F you government, we the people.
One other thing I see not discussed: the terrorists will soon adapt and will wipe and/or physically destroy their smartphones, and this issue will be largely moot.
I urge anyone who hasn't done so to sign the petition:
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/apple-privacy-petition . At the very least, this will force the Obama administration itself to publicly make the case for these FBI actions.
Actually Apple is proving how clever they are. Maximizing the free publicity, they understand how gullible some people can be. Believing every word Apple speaks, the devotees are lapping this up. Make no mistake, the Apple Marketing Machine is very effective.
You seem to be totally under a spell. I wonder who has you hoodwinked?Actually Apple is proving how clever they are. Maximizing the free publicity, they understand how gullible some people can be. Believing every word Apple speaks, the devotees are lapping this up. Make no mistake, the Apple Marketing Machine is very effective.
And yet Apple wanted to keep this quiet and we first heard about it from the FBI. Why did the FBI make it public? My gut, and anecdotal evidence, tells me they did it to garner public support, you know, by getting free publicity for the issue--otherwise known as a marketing tactic.Actually Apple is proving how clever they are. Maximizing the free publicity, they understand how gullible some people can be. Believing every word Apple speaks, the devotees are lapping this up. Make no mistake, the Apple Marketing Machine is very effective.
One things for certain, this is one very interesting contest between the Feds and Apple!And yet Apple wanted to keep this quiet and we first heard about it from the FBI. Why did the FBI make it public? My gut, and anecdotal evidence, tells me they did it to garner public support, you know, by getting free publicity for the issue--otherwise known as a marketing tactic.
I could see them moving things like the delay between pass codes and auto wipe into hardware where Apple cannot even modify it.
Could God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it?
Two factor auth with fingerprint and passphrase is something I desperately want. Even a 4 digit PIN would be essentially impossible to brute force if it needs a fingerprint along with it. A passphrase would be even better.
edit: This also provides legal protection in the US, since you can be compelled to give up a fingerprint, but not a password. Combining the two would be awesome.
Problem is, Obama supports the FBI's case...One other thing I see not discussed: the terrorists will soon adapt and will wipe and/or physically destroy their smartphones, and this issue will be largely moot.
I urge anyone who hasn't done so to sign the petition:
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/apple-privacy-petition . At the very least, this will force the Obama administration itself to publicly make the case for these FBI actions.
A lot of very secure environments have small "emp blasters" right next to sensitive digital storage that can rip though a system destroying the media. A few systems I have seen have bright colored tags right next to a hard disk. Pull the tap, a very strong charge is released into a coil focused on the storage media. Been told some are strong enough to disrupt pacemakers. Now imagine a "doomdays" iPhone case with a rip chord to pull when "the man" shows destroying your iPhone's data.
Spare us the emotional equivocation. It's not about preserving the rights of a terrorist, nor catching one. The terrorist is dead. The manner in which this tool could be abused has been shown unequivocally and repeatedly in all of these threads. What those, like yourself, would have us do is to simply trust the government. I don't, most of those that argue against Apple's cooperation don't, and given what we know about the US government's extralegal domestic surveillance activities, can you honestly blame us for thinking that?
And those of us with that stance aren't even necessarily afraid of anything being found out immediately, if there is even anything to find out. What we fear, correctly, is what happens with the data that is taken from us, without our knowledge that it's even been taken, and filed away. In an increasingly-polarised nation, what happens when a particular administration decides that people that are concerned with constitutionality are a hindrance or danger to the state? Or people that support the right to bear arms? It happened to the members of the Tea Party, who were hounded by the IRS (with impunity I should note), and it can happen to any of us. How many of us will one day find ourselves sitting in a Kafkaesque trial, finding our words, written and transmitted in private, used against us?
[doublepost=1456364306][/doublepost]
Just be aware of the safe combination standard. If they do that, never, ever write down the password. If you do, and they're aware of it, you can be compelled to turn it over.
For the umpteenth time, this isn't about one friggin' phone. What they've asked Apple to do goes far beyond simply asking them to give them data ... data which they don't have access to [because the data was never backed up to Apple's iCloud servers] or are capable of retrieving for the FBI thanks to the the FBI borking up that opportunity by activating the failsafes within the phone. You don't appear to have any idea what you're talking about because you don't seem to grasp the gravitas of the situation.No emotional equivocation at all. In fact, that was the very first thing I tried to address.
What you spoke about is truly not a future that I would wish upon us. No-one in their right mind would want that.
But there is a very large disconnect between the case at hand here and the possible future you just described.
It is not unprecedented for a government to ask a bank to open the safe of a criminal, or to freeze their funds, or to subpoena emails for use as evidence in court. So why is the phone, a digital safe, so sacred?
This is one phone. A phone from a recently deceased terrorist yes, but one that presumably could have been used during the planning stages of the attack. Who knows where that leads? Would you not want the authorities to follow this lead, after getting a valid warrant from a judge?
I think the emotional backlash over this case has caused fear-mongering to grow, on both sides.
That's an illogical jump. It sounds to me like Apple knows that they won't have to go through this circus again if they make a phone that they have no possible way to compromise."Apple has already begun work on implementing stronger security measures "even it can't hack" to protect iOS devices."
so they know they are going to give in on this case eventually? sounds like it.