Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,106
38,858


Apple is planning to allow for alternate app stores on iPhones and iPads ahead of European legislation that will require the company to support sideloading, reports Bloomberg.

iOS-App-Store-General-Feature-JoeBlue.jpg

The change would allow customers to download apps without needing to use the App Store, which would mean developers would not need to pay Apple's 15 to 30 percent fees, but to start with, Apple is only planning to implement sideloading support in Europe.

If other countries introduce similar legislation, alternate app stores could expand beyond the European Union. The United States, for example, is considering legislation that would require Apple to allow sideloading. Apple has claimed that sideloading will "undermine the privacy and security protections" that iPhone users rely on, leaving people vulnerable to malware, scams, data tracking, and other issues.

The European Union's Digital Markets Act that went into effect on November 1 requires "gatekeeper" companies to open up their services and platforms to other companies and developers. The DMA will have a major impact on Apple's platforms, and it could result in Apple making major changes to the App Store, Messages, FaceTime, Siri, and more. Apple has until March 6, 2024 to comply with the EU's rules.

According to Bloomberg, Apple's software engineering and services employees are working to open up "key elements of Apple's platforms," with Apple using a "significant amount of resources" for the change. Apple is planning for the functionality to be ready for iOS 17 in 2023, which would put it ahead of the deadline. There is a danger that these drastic updates could impact work on new features slated for iOS 17, some employees told Bloomberg.

To protect users from the aforementioned risks of sideloading, Apple is considering implementing security requirements such as verification, a process that it could charge a fee for in lieu of collecting money from app sales. Apple has a verification system on Mac that allows users to be safe while giving them access to apps outside of the Mac App Store.

Apple could open up underlying app frameworks and APIs to third-party app developers, providing deeper access to core system functions and hardware. Third-party apps could in the future get access to camera technologies not available now, and Apple is working to open up NFC in a limited way that could allow for Apple Pay alternatives. Apple is also considering further opening up the Find My network to accessory makers like Tile. As of now, Apple lets third-party device makers create Find My accessories, but there is a requirement that prevents them from working with non-Find My apps and services.

There is an aspect of the Digital Markets Act that would require Apple to allow developers to install third-party payment systems within their apps, and Apple has not yet "made a final decision" on whether it will comply with the rule. Apple is also undecided on how the Messages app might be made available to third-party services, as the DMA requires interoperability between messaging platforms.

Apple has to comply with the Digital Markets Act because the European Union can fine a company as much as 20 percent of its global revenue if the laws are violated. If Apple does not implement the changes, fines could be as high as $80 billion.

In addition to resulting in major changes to the App Store and other Apple services, European legislation is also pushing Apple to adopt USB-C across all of its devices, a change that will be made in 2023.

Article Link: Apple Working to Add Support for Sideloading and Alternate App Stores in Europe
 
Last edited:
Personally, I've never had a downside in all 14 years that drove me away from the Apple App Store. But of course there are many people who always think that something else has to be better per se.
Are those happier with such an attitude towards life?
I don't necessarily think so.
 
Last edited:
Good luck to anyone who downloads a trojan. You’re on your own from there.
Not at all:

"To help protect against unsafe apps, Apple is discussing the idea of mandating certain security requirements even if software is distributed outside its store. Such apps also may need to be verified by Apple — a process that could carry a fee. Within the App Store, Apple takes a 15% to 30% cut of revenue. "
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
I'm more excited for higher transfer speeds via USB-C. As I get older I care less and less about doing things like emulating consoles on my phone. Excited for others, but I'll stick to the app store.

I do care about transferring over large video files in a reasonable amount of time, tho!
 
I'm pretty sure it will be prefaced with scary warning messages about overall device security. It wouldn't surprise me if you had to disable a lot of features to make it work (e.g. no iCloud) and that it will be firewalled off from things like your photos and other data.

I actually like living in the walled garden for the most part. I don't find Apps too expensive with the 30% Apple tax added and the experience is generally good. I tried jailbreaking back in the day of iPhone 3G and hated how unstable my phone would get with it. I am sure things have improved, but it left a bad taste.
 
People who are asking for sideloading have no idea how bad it's going to ruin the UX

"but you don't have to sideload"

yeah until microsoft, google, activision, epic, adobe create their stores and make their apps/games exclusive

then you'll have to install a bunch of apps running 20 auto updater/notification services in the background sucking up all the battery

"but android allowed sideloading and that hasn't happened yet"

yeah because iOS is where the money is. once iOS does it, it'll happen
 
Last edited:
Can't wait to see the annual developer license fees that go along with this... Expect $5k per year to start then based on size of company the fee goes up. People will be wishing they kept the current setup...

Before anyone cries foul, this is what many software companies already do...
 
Not at all:

"To help protect against unsafe apps, Apple is discussing the idea of mandating certain security requirements even if software is distributed outside its store. Such apps also may need to be verified by Apple — a process that could carry a fee. Within the App Store, Apple takes a 15% to 30% cut of revenue. "

That’s a best case scenario.

Now think of a country like Russia. It says ‘**** your security requirements Apple. We want complete sideload and we want our government apps on every citizen’s phone’

Then another country copies the Russian example, and another, and another. Then we end up with half the world’s iPhones under surveillance.

So your hopium about secure freedom of sideloading fails. An autocrat regime will simply take all phone data and organised crime will feed on it too.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.