Win-win situation.
The owner no longer gets a refurbished iPhone with reworked components. And it's cheaper for the consumer.
They’ll say something else was broken and keep the $99 bucks, it never failsYou should contact Apple right away and see if they will give you the new price.
I suspect they are still using the rear system to fix back glass crack, as replacing the back glass without replacing other component is so tidious and time consuming, the glue that used for adhering the back glass is very difficult to removeUh, a refurbished iPhone is basically like-new to Apple. They’re reducing the price so that they no longer need to give you a basically new device. They’ll fix the glass, charge you (albeit less) and save themselves refurb units. It’s a win/win, but mostly for Apple lmao.
the battery is included in the rear systemThat's good news, I wonder if they would let you pay out of pocket to get the battery replaced during the repair.. Be like a new phone..
i've been eyeing that case since before iphone 11 was even out(hence the rumors)! one of my favorite films!I know, right?
They wouldn't even arrange the camera with the lidar that way. 🤣
That would be too funny!
you know you were good for it, as you watched it slowly move towards the groundVery true and it never failed that it would shatter
yes, i'm very happy they lost the round corners — those were nothing but trouble)Especially since it will thicker and have square sides, maybe it won't feel so slippery.
That's not good news.. It's ridiculously unsustainable. Apple with their greenwashing ********...That's good news, I wonder if they would let you pay out of pocket to get the battery replaced during the repair.. Be like a new phone..
This is the only comment that makes sense in this whole thread. It is another BS extended warranty (insurance) product. I wouldn’t insure a $500 car by paying $100 annually, so why would I insure a $500 repair?!If you pay for apple care, you are bad with money. What a waste.
Why do these phones have to be "traded in"? Why can't they be "returned, defective" when they break so easily?It's about time—
As far as Apple is concerned (i.e. for trade-in value), breaking the back is just as bad as breaking the front.
And ceramic shield is only on the front; in other words, the back is easier to break, yet for years it has cost $99 to replace the back vs. $29 to replace the screen. And let's not forget: the back doesn't need to be made of glass, a famously breakable material. It was practically a scam, so this is a welcome change.
They’ll say something else was broken and keep the $99 bucks, it never fails