I didn't get it. I have an otterbox on my mini. I feel that is enough protection.
I don't have kids and am not especially accident prone.
During the policy period, we will cover a loss due to accidental damage (including drops and liquid spills), theft, fire, flood, power surge due to lightning or natural disasters, and vandalism to the iPod Touch you own or have leased -- including corporate/school issued iPod Touches entrusted to you,
This here is a little bit to my point. I happen to think that these bulky cases cost quite a bit of money themselves (nearly 1/2 the cost of Applecare+ ?) and rob you of the greatest reason for paying this much for a tablet - THE DESIGN.
Another $50 and you never need to worry about breaking/scratching/dropping your device whatsoever while you enjoy the light, thin, sexy, and portable design as it's meant to be enjoyed!
If you are planning on possibly selling in a year then you have a device much more desirable than most. You will get top dollar without much effort.
Worth every penny IMO.
It's all relative. I agree there's value, but I don't see it as much. Also, it's not just the cost of AppleCare. You also have to factor in the deductible if you break it.
Also, I don't consider an otterbox "robbing" me of much. It's still very portable and fits in the palm of my hand.
I don't like naked iPads. It's a personal preference. So for me (I'm carefully choosing these words because there's a lot of "my opinion proves why yours is wrong" on here) I'm gonna always have a case on.
It's not that I use a case so I don't have to get applecare. It's more that I don't need applecare since I use a case.