Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This will be a device like the Amazon Echo Show 10, mostly intended to be voice-controlled, but with a touchscreen for more involved and precise operation when needed:

shopping


The rumored upcoming next-gen Google Nest Hub will likely be similar to that as well.
I hope I'm wrong, but also, potentially... Ads! Hooray for ads! (NOT). Advertisers are bending over backwards to have your whole home lit up like Times Square. Perhaps we could have the Siri Google Gemini Aquarius home hub on the kitchen island facing the Samsung fridge with the screen, and they can see and talk to each other overnight for company. Maybe they could put a screen onto a Thermomix and add some arms so that all we have to do is put the ingredients into glass bowls and it does all the prep and cooking. What if the Apple home hub could ask the fridge if it has some eggs, milk, capsicum, ham, and spinach in stock so that the home hub can recommend a frittata or omelette for breakfast :)
Ugh, the possibilities are endless! I need to lie down, it's all too exciting 😁
 
Think it will launch at $399. Looks like it will replace the standard HomePod. Waiting to see the new device. Hopefully Siri will be much better than it is now when it launches. Also waiting to see the new Apple security camera. Will be having all the privacy features and I think it will sell well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I was cleaning at a client's office and they had these table-top all-screen devices on the table that were connected to projectors. Walking into the room activated the device automatically. It was quite neat!

View attachment 2576539

The price? $1600 — for just THIS one device! Projector not included.

Apple may not be first to implement such a screen-based device that lives in a fixed position, but they'll definitely come out with an amazing device at a better price than this!
Logitech has a few overpriced enterprise/business devices. My last job had what amounted to a wall-mounted soundbar + webcam combo. It was several thousands of dollars…
 
“Smarter more capable Siri.” I certainly hope so over the last couple of days dictating a text, Siri was incapable of picking the right form of two, too, or to in a sentence where the context should’ve been easy to figure out which one to use. Then another text I sent I use the word “would you,” but Siri came back with “Wood you.” yes for some reason it picks a capital W. And since I use Siri to dictate this post, it made the same mistakes again. If this is the future of AI, Apple is in serious trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I have a lot of reservations adding unnecessary displays in my home. Some times I don’t need constant display in my home. Do I really need to see the outdoor temperature or cameras all the time? Same with fridges with displays I’m really not a fan. I have a few smart home devices but I’m pretty happy with my current setup (smart lock, garage, alarm, nest thermostat, 2 cameras).
 
Struggling to understand the benefit of a centralised ‘command centre’ for smart homes. If I need a screen I use my phone/ipad that I have on my person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KENESS
Maybe it’s just me, but… another device, for what, exactly?
Why not integrate this into Apple TV and use it as an AI smart-home hub, accessible from my other devices like the iPad, which I can place wherever I need it? Why another box? Oh, right, shareholders over customers.
I’m almost sorry to say this as a long-time, laid-back Apple fan, but if I didn’t love my Mac Studio and macOS so much, 2025 would be the year I’d say no to these salami-slice releases and the “wow, the button looks different now” news. I’m tired :)
 
I'm really heavy into HomeKit... Three separate "homes" and hundreds of devices controlling everything from ACs, opening and closing windows, cutting off the water service to an area or the whole building (depending on severity) if a leak is detected and even raising and lowering storefront signage.

I can't see wanting to interact with a fixed location "home hub" on my wall or desk. If Siri is the primary focus, that is/will be on all HomePods which are already sprinkled throughout the spaces. And my phone is the quickest non-Siri way of control, and it is always with me.

I already have iPads on the wall dedicated to controlling the home, and I've just never found a use case for them. They do look cool, though.
Very interesting I have 100’s of devices from hive lights, TRV’s, ring cameras and door bells etc etc as well but struggle with HomeKit Alexa seems to do a far better job maybe I am doing something wrong then
 
Struggling to understand the benefit of a centralised ‘command centre’ for smart homes. If I need a screen I use my phone/ipad that I have on my person.
I have used google nest home products for a few years and looking to ditch them and would jump on this slightly quicker if the projected price were lower. You can set up a google home with a £90 hub, £100 -£200 cams etc a hub has some benefits as it creates a discrete network from the internet. I would love to see apple taking the security/privacy side further - using private relay etc. Sorry about the flavour of this old chestnut but: if only apple could have bought nest instead of google
 
my very limited use of HomeKit has not been great with Lifx lights.

You scan the QR code to add a light and it starts HomeKit.
And then you wait and often fail.
Then you wait 15 minutes for HomeKit to fall over and then you add the light to the Lifx app that lets you control a lot more than just on and off and basic colours.

My latest purchase, a Lifx Luna light, was much quicker and easier to set up.
Within a minute is was working.
And you can program physical buttons on the light to do things.
I can press one button and it will turn on/off other Matter enabled lights.
It sounds like a gimmick until you realise it's just quick and easy.

Hopefully future Lifx products will be more like this product.
 
mweh... I'd say use an iPad, even several older models could perfectly function as a control pad.

If Apple does want to make HomeKit run fully local, including camera storage... how about a new AppleTV with significant more storage or a Mac mini?
I mean a small Mac mini could do it all, including content caching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Topfry
I hope the ghost of Jony Ive is finally exorcised from the design of the HomePod line. It was super stupid to have the display on top of the speaker.
 
I hope the ghost of Jony Ive is finally exorcised from the design of the HomePod line. It was super stupid to have the display on top of the speaker.
I don’t get why a speaker needs a complex display - a display may need a speaker, perhaps - the Homebase thing would be more about home automation than hifi anyway.
Personally, I’m still happy ( in general ) with 1st gen og homepods- but the output was slightly downgraded in gen 2… and honestly the design is pretty functional…
 
Oh man. While I realize it's a long shot, I really wish Apple would release a constellation of aesthetically pleasing home automation products, like what was lost as Google has incrementally stopped supporting Nest. I loved the design of my Nest Protect smoke detectors and Nest Secure alarm system. It was the most Apple-like in terms of industrial engineering (perhaps owing to Tony Fadell's contributions). All of the alternatives range from least ugly to horrible.
 
I’ve been on Amazon echo’s for 10 years. But their forcing of ads on me means I’m out.

I just need Apple to give me a reason to switch everything over. Hoping this system does it…
 
  • Like
Reactions: p.willis
Very interesting I have 100’s of devices from hive lights, TRV’s, ring cameras and door bells etc etc as well but struggle with HomeKit Alexa seems to do a far better job maybe I am doing something wrong then
I have nearly perfect uptime. Siri can be a little sketchy, as people love to drone on and on about, but my trouble with Siri is when she can't hear me well and misinterprets what I said. In the context of HomeKit usage, if she hears me properly, she does the task fine.

Speech recognition is pretty good, but that is an area I hope Apple continuously improves. Especially as requests get more and more complex, as opposed to "Play" and "Stop" and "Next Song" like HomePods were originally kind of designed for.

Really, the only time anything is unavailable is if the battery is out or some device is updating. (Although even that is rare, because the HomePod's never seem to all update at once. So even when my designated home hub HomePod goes offline for an update, one of the others just takes over, and then they trade back and the other one updates.)

I've found having a rock solid WiFi network is critical. And to having as few WiFi smart devices as possible. Most WiFi routers just weren't really designed for tons of tiny low-data-rate devices, that's just not WiFi's best use case. Zigbee and Thread are much, much better for smart devices.

My air conditioners are all WiFi, and there is no way around that. And since each air handler has its own WiFi connection, that's 32 connections right there. Luckily they're all very stable. But that's already a lot, so I generally avoid any other WiFi smart devices when I have the choice.

Thread is basically just the newly revised Zigbee, created by the same people, with some substantial improvements. But still very similar, and still well suited to smart devices like sensors and light switches and outlets and buttons which just need to send a tiny blip of data every once in a while as opposed to WiFi which is designed to continuously transmit dumpster loads of data every millisecond so you can watch your 4k Netflix.

HomePods can be your Thread border router already, so you don't need anything. For Zigbee, a coordinator/hub that has a wired ethernet (or USB) connection is great.

Thread and Zigbee are both mesh networks, so the more devices you have that expand and fill out the mesh, the better and more resilient they are. For Zigbee, which is my primary device type right now, I used Zigbee light switches in every room to control the lights. Since the switches are hardwired to power and therefore signal repeaters, that means every battery powered end-device sensor is no farther away from signal than the light switch in its own room.

If you're well established with Alexa, certainly no reason to change. But HomeKit isn't inherently lacking on the software architecture side of things, so there's no reason to avoid it if someone was picking a system to use.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.