You're right. Technically, Apple never said that anyone could become a professional coder just by signing up for a class at a community college. I think, to me, the implication when they say "everyone can code" is that everyone can be a coder. And you're right...even though they sound similar, they are very different things. It's a bit of a language/semantics thing. Like when I say, "everyone can read," it is very much like saying, "everyone can be a reader." But a "Reader" is not a profession (well, not really).
I do think it's a little insulting to people who ARE actual professional coders to say that "everyone can code," since that is like saying to them that everyone can do what they do...so they're really not so special after all. I don't know.... I guess when "coding" is something people generally do to earn a living (unlike "reading" or "walking" or "eating" or other things that everyone can do), when you say everyone can do it, you're kind of saying that everyone can do it for a living, even though that's not explicitly what you're saying. But it certainly is how it SOUNDS to me, which is why I called it "misleading." Remember, I didn't say they were lying...just misleading.
Anyway, your point is taken. And by the way, I DO support education all the way around, and I think anything to get the general public thinking more logically and analytically has to be a good thing. I just hope they all don't think they can become coders after reading one book and taking one community college course. I am literally a rocket scientist and a physician, and as I am currently reading the "App Development with Swift" book by Apple, I think it is far from a walk in the park. Now, as I said in an earlier post, maybe I'm just too old of a dog to learn new tricks, but I found gross anatomy and pharmacology to be much easier than learning Swift and Xcode. Well, anyway, that's my two cents.
P.S. Aerodynamics and Structural Mechanics WERE a bit more challenging than iOS development, but that's neither here nor there.