Let's think what the self-driving vehicle will do for those that are blind. While self-driving cars would be a nice luxury for most of us, it's a life changer for those that are vision impaired.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Automobile Project Said to Include Self-Driving Cars
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Has no one mentioned Apple will need to build lots of dealerships to service the cars? No way the Apple store is going to service them.
Maybe the cars will be throwaway items though with nothing repairable. This actually wouldn't surprise me today
These electric cars don't need regular service like conventional cars except for the occasional tire and brakes, they last forever. Apple could also work with a pure renting model.
That said, this project is so big that Apple would need to split the division into a separate company to manage it.
I still worry that many here are just thinking that driverless cars are far easier a problem to crack.
I can 100% totally see these things being possible on special controlled roads/areas, so that other people know they are entering a computer driver car area, hence you then put to onus on us normal folks to be the ones that have to modify our behaviour when entering their controlled zone.
THAT I can see as you have shifted the rules.
The other way round, just seems there is a long long way to go.
I hope I'm wrong as I'd love to see them, even though they will be vastly expensive.
Right now, I think cities would grind to a halt with them, as there would be things cropping up all over the city that the car can't cope with, it will get stuck, traffic will build up behind it, and it was all jam solid.
I want to be proved wrong
I can 100% totally see these things being possible on special controlled roads/areas, so that other people know they are entering a computer driver car area, hence you then put to onus on us normal folks to be the ones that have to modify our behaviour when entering their controlled zone.
THAT I can see as you have shifted the rules.
The other way round, just seems there is a long long way to go.
I hope I'm wrong as I'd love to see them, even though they will be vastly expensive.
Right now, I think cities would grind to a halt with them, as there would be things cropping up all over the city that the car can't cope with, it will get stuck, traffic will build up behind it, and it was all jam solid.
I want to be proved wrong
I still worry that many here are just thinking that driverless cars are far easier a problem to crack.
I can 100% totally see these things being possible on special controlled roads/areas, so that other people know they are entering a computer driver car area, hence you then put to onus on us normal folks to be the ones that have to modify our behaviour when entering their controlled zone.
THAT I can see as you have shifted the rules.
The other way round, just seems there is a long long way to go.
I hope I'm wrong as I'd love to see them, even though they will be vastly expensive.
Right now, I think cities would grind to a halt with them, as there would be things cropping up all over the city that the car can't cope with, it will get stuck, traffic will build up behind it, and it was all jam solid.
I want to be proved wrong
And that's how it starts. First highways (huge traffic efficiency opportunity btw). Then major roads. Then... and later once the kinks are worked out... the city.
BS, some rich people don't like to be like everybody else, don't expect an "all the cars are the same and boring" and democratic crappy world, because there is a lot of people with a lot of $$$$ who like another things, thanks God. That's why +250 000 $ supercars already exist, not because they're logical and promote legality and equality and all that stuff
Last edited:
Still waiting on Apple to release an OS without bugs.
----------
Show me the statistics on self driving cars developed by Apple. Let's start with trust in their other products as a lead measure to their capability first.
----------
^^ all of those things already exist on cars. is Apple just going to copy them and claim that technology is theirs?
my point being I have little trust in Apple to develop anything that's perfect. history doesn't prove me wrong.
LOL back.....self driving a cars aren't going to fix or protect you from the decisions made by other drivers. Computers are good at calculated decisions but they are not able to use good judgement. There's a difference.
Besides, I stand by my point that Apple has yet to get simple iOS launches down pat. Hell, let's not forget their attempt to launch Apple Maps. No thanks, I don't need to risk lives on that skill set.
I just want to drive my own car myself.
I do think it will be great for the visual impaired, but all the legal implications before this can take off seem an enormous obstacle.
Self driving car need to avoid accident, sees two cyclists, one with a helmet and one without. Will the car calculate that it´s better to hit the cyclists with helmet as he is less likely to get a head injury on impact.
Same with small cars and big trucks, better to hit the big truck as it´s less likely to hurt the people inside. Then you hack your car so it will hit smaller cars instead, as that will make less of an impact on you car.
Decisions, decisions.....
I do think it will be great for the visual impaired, but all the legal implications before this can take off seem an enormous obstacle.
Self driving car need to avoid accident, sees two cyclists, one with a helmet and one without. Will the car calculate that it´s better to hit the cyclists with helmet as he is less likely to get a head injury on impact.
Same with small cars and big trucks, better to hit the big truck as it´s less likely to hurt the people inside. Then you hack your car so it will hit smaller cars instead, as that will make less of an impact on you car.
Decisions, decisions.....
I can see it would be a great thing for some, if you could leave work, drive to a bar, have a few drinks at the end of a long hard hot day.
Some ice cold beers, then get in your car and it drives you home safely.
THAT I could see as being a very popular ADDITION to a current normal car.
If you image you had the normal car, you could just sit the passenger seat, press home, and it took you home.
We are YEARS away from that but would be good
Self driving car will analyze the trajectories of both the bikes and also the way you think. It will narrowly avoid both cyclists, and even lock the doors to prevent you from getting one of them with your door.
I can see it would be a great thing for some, if you could leave work, drive to a bar, have a few drinks at the end of a long hard hot day.
Some ice cold beers, then get in your car and it drives you home safely.
THAT I could see as being a very popular ADDITION to a current normal car.
If you image you had the normal car, you could just sit the passenger seat, press home, and it took you home.
We are YEARS away from that but would be good
Now, that would be great. Guess taxi drivers will be a dying breed.
----------
Ahh, good. No worries then;-)
Hmm, I thought folks had identified many of the things on the mini van. They are certainly cameras. But the round disks are something else. I called them sensors, but whatever they are they are certainly related to informing the car about its location.
Charging is very easy. Electricity is easy and fast to work with. In the suburbs where people have garages this will be no trouble at all, folks will just have a charging station put in for a few hundred bucks. Gas stations who start loosing customers will turn over a spot to electricity charging (along with a coffee station for folks to wait the half hour to charge their car).
As for most of the other electricity issues that is easy as well. The cars will largely charge overnight when they electricity grid is already underutilized. The reduction in gasoline usage will free up a lot of money and energy usage. If the grid needs more energy sources we will just add solar (or natural gas if gas prices seem like they are going to stay permanently low). The utilities would love it if the energy load was more consistent and by simply charging a bit less for energy at night that could be done. The cars would be programmed to pull energy during the cheaper night time.
I don't know what city folks will do though. I suppose folks who normally park their car on the street will have to find some solution. The city may put in charging stations where you run your credit card and get a charge. I've seen a public charging stations like that at the Bill Clinton Museum. Or maybe once a few weeks (city drivers often don't rack up the miles) those folks will park in a garage where they will get charged up.
These are nice speculations, but that isn't going to be the way the car reacts. The car is just going to brake as fast as it can. Since it will probably brake faster than most humans can react, this will be enough in most cases.
What this will take will be legislative action that insulates the car companies from some amount of liability. As you say, self driving cars will have to be really really good before they are allowed to operate at all in anything but test situations. But once they are that good, the car companies will ask congress for some exception to protect them in the rare cases. The trade off will be the MASSIVE decrease in driving fatalities. I'm assuming the stats will quickly become apparent that self driving cars are 90% less likely to get into a fatal accident than human driven cars (or something like that) and this will be a sufficient trade off to give the car companies a bit of legal protection.
But yes we've a long way to go, I suspect, before these cars can drive well at night or in the rain. And also for the tech to be affordable enough.
Exactly these are just rumours and it "suggests" what's happening or the perception of what's happening. That's why I said "maybe". It's all hypothetical right now. Who knows but the brass at Apple are doing with cars.
UFO myself. 
Silliest, persistant rumor to date. Yet so many are falling into believing this. lol If anything it would have to do with iOS, devices and media. Hey who knows right? For all you believers know, this could be a diversion for the Spaceship being built in Cupertino.
Of course we don't know but a lot of the comments seem to be centered around what people think is feasible for Apple as a consumer electronics company, not what the rumors themselves seem to be suggesting. If this project was just around bolstering CarPlay I don't think you'd have a VP of iPhone hardware (a mechanical engineer) leading the project. I don't think Tim Cook would be authorizing a team of 1000 to work on it and I don't think you'd have members of Jony Ive's design team meeting with auto executives/engineers/designers.
Maybe Tim Cook's big ambition is to take Apple beyond consumer electronics. Or maybe he believes the auto industry is right for disruption and that cars are slowly becoming computers. Marc Andreessen tweeted if Tesla can do it so can Apple if if wants to. Last year Tim Cook said in an interview he expected iPhone to be the primary revenue driver for Apple for the next 5 years. Perhaps this project is about what comes after that.
The biggest complaint of elderly in nursing homes: "Where's my car?!?!"
It is comforting knowing that when I get there I won't have to worry about that. My car will drive me to Walmart 3.0.
It is comforting knowing that when I get there I won't have to worry about that. My car will drive me to Walmart 3.0.
I would hope by then, they had killed Siri off, She is worthless.
Hopefully Jeeves will take me home and be able to do everything Siri can't do.