Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Automotive Team Includes Former Tesla, Ford and GM Employees
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
-Hey Siri. How far is it to 354, Seale Avenue?
-You're seeing John again? (Siri starts engine)
-Yes. Please, can you drive me there.
-I'm calling your sister. (Ringtone sound from car speakers)
-Where are you driving me?!
"Hello sis! What's up?"
Most people will re-charge an electric car at home overnight just like an iPhone.
For long-distance travel, Tesla has a network of 120 kW charging stations that can re-charge an 85 kWH battery to 50% in 20 minutes (good for about 150 highway miles in a Tesla Model S). The chargers have been acknowledged to scale to 135 kW in this generation of fast DC charging.
The tech already exists for fast charging. The main problem is battery cost. Hydrogen is problematic because it is inefficient to produce, corrosive, and must be stored under high pressure because of its low density. Hydrogen sounds good at first because the fueling process is similar to gasoline, but its actually much worse than batteries in terms of complexity and efficiency.
I'd love to see a partnership with Tesla. I'm not sure how many auto companies will want to give up their dash to Apple. How does Apple do it right and still allow each car company a certain level of uniqueness? Will Ford want their dashboard to look just like GM's?
Why are people finding this so hard to believe?
A car is a ubiquitous device that can be radically improved upon and simplifiedjust like any of Apples other products were. Sure, it's a big 'gamble', but the risk is quite possibly worth the reward, and willingness to venture forward is a hallmark of successful entities.
Further thoughts: Electric car = far less moving parts; Autonomous-driving cars = far less human error; Mark Newson = experienced in car concept design.
A car is a ubiquitous device that can be radically improved upon and simplifiedjust like any of Apples other products were. Sure, it's a big 'gamble', but the risk is quite possibly worth the reward, and willingness to venture forward is a hallmark of successful entities.
Further thoughts: Electric car = far less moving parts; Autonomous-driving cars = far less human error; Mark Newson = experienced in car concept design.
Apple is building a smart car (computer car) not a car, the computer is the one who enters in the car business and apple happens to be computer company, this how computer evolution works, if you don't like a smart car idea blame you'reselfs, you're the one who replaced that stupid nokia phone with a smartphone (computer) etc.
I highly doubt Tesla, Ford and others knows more about how to build a computer car than Apple or Google, also is not that hard build a normal car, if an ucranian less-known company knows how to build a car, definitely Apple can do it too!
I highly doubt Tesla, Ford and others knows more about how to build a computer car than Apple or Google, also is not that hard build a normal car, if an ucranian less-known company knows how to build a car, definitely Apple can do it too!
I don't see how you can compare an iWatch or e payment system with automobile manufacture. They already make tiny electronics, and those tiny electronics have lots of radios capable of making a secure transaction.
With all the reports of cars being hackable I wonder if having such "rich" access to car systems (networkable) is such a good idea.
As it is CANBUS (mainly used by the Euro cars) has like no sort of authentication, maybe that should be fixed first before introducing more holes.
But at the time the iPod wasn't even close to being a computer. It was a mp3 player with a few functions for playing music. Not until the iPhone did anything like a mobile computer exist for a phone.
If you look at the iPod of that time (not the iPod touch since it didn't exist) It is nothing like a small computer and it only had limited functionality. The iPhone was not simply in 'Apple's wheel house' and an inevitable extension of the iPod.
----------
Easy...
What does it take to start a automobile manufacture?
Money (lots of money) --- check
Automobile expertise --- buying up now with all that money
(all areas)
That should be a good start. Lets just see where this goes.
Perhaps the best part of this "rumor" is it provides lots of fodder for the late night TV hosts to joke around with. Finding the humor here is a great source of laughs and entertainment until something concrete is officially announced.
I can't wait to see how Samsung responds.
I know your comment is meant to be a joke, but....
Samsung already build ships... and submarines.
When it comes to heavy industry manufacturing, and integration of navigation and autonomy into vehicles, Samsung has already been doing it for decades.
Samsung Electronics also builds electronics for military vehicles.
Also, Google already have their own consumer facing autonomous vehicle designs... Samsung have the manufacturing ability to produce those.
"Samsung Thales Corp. (STC) is set to win a $120 million contract to supply cutting-edge automated combat systems for the nation's first 3,000-ton KSS-III attack submarine to be deployed after 2020, officials of the Agency for Defense Development (ADD)and the Defense Acquisitio Program Administration (DAPA) said Wednesday. "
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/05/205_44861.html
You'll discover that with a Mechanical Engineer now running GM, that it is rebounding. GM has lots of talented engineers who are overridden by bean counters that demand build to fail products as a means of generating repeat business.
How dare they copy Apple on there secret plans to make military hardware done 2020! Samsung just released their early to Breast askew to the punch!
/s
An iPod is definitely a small computer, albeit without the breadth of a general purpose computer. Although an iPhone is not inevitable, it's definitely within or closer to their field of personal computing. It differs in form factor and UI for sure, but you can go back to the Newton to see an earlier example of this IMO.
I can't wait to see how Samsung responds
Once the car is released, they'll make over 200 drawings for their version.
----------
Jony Ive would bring that down to 1 ton by 2020 and make it in gold.
Apple has decades of experience with electronics, batteries, charging and human interfaces. I am fascinated to see what ideas Apple might incorporate into an electric vehicle.
As I've said before, replacing the internal combustion engine (and related subsystems) with electric motors would eliminate a huge engineering overhead. Vehicle structural design and engineering is such a well established discipline that Apple could quickly bring a product to market.
Apple doesn't have to reinvent the wheel.
As I've said before, replacing the internal combustion engine (and related subsystems) with electric motors would eliminate a huge engineering overhead. Vehicle structural design and engineering is such a well established discipline that Apple could quickly bring a product to market.
Apple doesn't have to reinvent the wheel.
Here you are wrong. I used a Windows Mobile based phone for three or four years before the iPhone appeared. The iPhone was not the first 'mobile computer for a phone'.
If there is one thing that doesn't scare me it is Samsung trying to build a car because I can't think of any korean made car that I would want to have, not for free. Hyundai, Kia (do they still exist?), Ssangyong
some of the crappiest cars ever built come from over there.