Because when you stop the subscription, you have nothing to show for all those payments.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Beats Music Deal Seen as Key to Bolstering Declining iTunes Revenue Momentum
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Because when you stop the subscription, you have nothing to show for all those payments.
Those are some pretty misleading charts. Just because the app store has exploded doesn't mean a mature market like iTMS is in trouble by comparison. The actual decline in iTMS has been a few percent, nothing too serious, and easily explained by the fact that iTMS wasn't going to dominate forever as many, many new companies enter the market. iTMS will still be a popular, successful business as the market reshapes itself.
I'd much rather Apple focus on video. That's where the revolution needs to happen.
I'd much rather Apple focus on video. That's where the revolution needs to happen.
I prefer to buy music. I buy at least one new album a month from iTunes. I don't like streaming services for a variety of reasons. Buying is the only way to guarantee that music will be yours forever. Otherwise you're just renting. But I'm a music junkie and I think these days most people aren't remotely passionate about music. It's a commodity, to be tossed aside the minute the next best song comes along. Call me old fashioned, but I want to buy an album and listen to it from start to finish. The idea of buying (or renting) individual tracks is not interesting to me.
I think Apple should drop the price of music. I think most people still want to own it, but all you can eat streaming for $10/month is too hard to resist. If albums cost $5 instead of $10, more people would buy. And the artist would still probably make more money than on a streaming deal.
I think Apple should drop the price of music. I think most people still want to own it, but all you can eat streaming for $10/month is too hard to resist. If albums cost $5 instead of $10, more people would buy. And the artist would still probably make more money than on a streaming deal.
If you expect to pay your rent with iTunes and Spotify royalties you need to reevaluate your career in music
I don't expect to pay rent with it, and of course I'd be extremely lucky if I were ever able to.
My point was that in an ideal world, a business as difficult as music would have a model (like iTunes or traditional record stores) that is built to support content creators. I can say from my own experience that Spotify and the other streaming services are not built in this way.
If you enjoy not paying directly for music now, you certainly won't when you're favourite artists aren't able to justify pouring years of their time and money into making it.
Only way iTunes will survive if they start streaming movies like Netflix or Amazon Prime or allow Amazon Prime on Apple TV and they allow streaming music like Spotify also drop the deal with Beats music, no one wants to hear 100 hours of mainstream music.
I have not seen a rental for $7.99 on iTunes...and I've never paid more than on Xbox, Amazon, or anywhere else for the same thing on iTunes. Both of those are attached to an ID as well...
I also feel like I'm in the minority, but ever since iTunes has been around, I've been buying my music. I've considered using streaming services, but it comes down to the fact that I like to own my music to have it for offline use, as well as it keeping the play counts of them all accurately (I'm a little funny about that, but oh well). iTunes Radio is nice, but I prefer just shuffling my somewhat large library instead of hearing random songs I don't know at all much of the time.
None of these options are going to "beat" the other, at least not any time soon, because they cater to different needs and different people.
None of these options are going to "beat" the other, at least not any time soon, because they cater to different needs and different people.
Every single month? Are you crazy? I hit the point where there was virtually nothing of real value left to buy unless it was a new release before MP3 even came along.
----------
Right, because that guy is a customer service rep for Apple...
It's no wonder that people like you hate Apple, you think anything said comes right out of their mouths.
Youtube and Spotify WON the streaming match, Game Over
buying a 4th tier streaming system with 110k users
not to mention past the fad headphones (no one even steals them anymore)
terrible vision
buying a 4th tier streaming system with 110k users
not to mention past the fad headphones (no one even steals them anymore)
terrible vision
This makes zero sense, if they put Amazon Prime on Apple TV, it will not help iTunes in any way whatsoever.
And yes, the mainstream wants to hear 100 hours of mainstream music, that's why it's called mainstream.
Music died years ago. Thanks to Simon Cowell and his ilk. Naturally there's less to choose from unless you like singer songwriters who enjoy a bit of autotune on the side. Apple finished music product years ago. So albums went the same way as music. No original groups are encouraged now. No rebellious innovation. Accept it. And just go on YouTube and search for Old Grey Whistle Test and pretend you've gone back in time 35 years. Sorted. And. You'll save money too!
Steve Jobs said no one wants subscriptions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=S6DX5NaPvk4#t=1379
The guy was notorious for blabbing out stupid things.
Well, for once, to have my music perfectly organized with correct tags, to have play counts, to have different masters of the same song, to sort by composer, by album artists, to have BPM included in each song, to have lyrics displayed on the song, to have ratings on each song, etc.
I understand 99% of people do not care, and that's fine, but never generalize.
To me the solution is pretty obvious, inn the end, music will be subscription only, in 4 - 5 years, but meanwhile, Apple should have both traditional downloads and an APPLE, not beats, but apple subscription service, with the best catalogue and iTunes Plus AAC 256 kbps quality.
And if they want to keep the iTunes Store alive, they should offer 24/96 ALAC files, but for the same price, if they plan on charging an extra dollar, believe me, it would be a failure in the long term, if they offered HD tracks at the same price, combined with the Mastered for iTunes bagde, believe me the iTMS will completely survive a good 3-4 years.
As for iTunes Match, raise the price to $99, but match the 24/96 songs and raise the limit to 99.999 songs, that way they get even more revenue and the iTMS will be the definitive place to buy music, killing CD's completely.
Not really every month, because it was too much work.
But that is what I would have to buy, to match my Deezer usage.
nope, you only lose the ability to play the music in a playlist. spotify will let you stream radio and artist shuffle for free.
and the same can be said for buying music. once you stop buying you can only listen to what you have. and then only if it's on your device at the time
Totally, HD audio is what Apple needs to do to stay relevant and kill of CD's completely, and that revenue would be for Apple now.
I meant Amazon Prime will help Apple TV sorry not iTunes and as mainstream music not everyone listens to mainstream just because it is mainstream.
Keep in mind that the slice of the pie includes the most profitable headphone buisness in the world.
Very true at what you said I am amazed that no music videos are available in HD the ones that I bought with the album are SD 480p it least and as for HD music another set back and as for 1080p movies very true not sure why Apple has not considered improving that yet even moving to HD audio heck 4K movies are coming out slowly even 3D. So much room for Apple to improve iTunes not sure what is going anymore.
In what universe?
That would be nice! Maybe you could explain how that every HD movie I've purchased in iTunes have all been 720p...
That would be nice! Maybe you could explain how that every HD movie I've purchased in iTunes have all been 720p...
I agree but it's not the total answer. HD downloads would triple the size of the files. Not plausible for people with 16GB devices and no SD storage.
They would also be buying a business that will probably do 1.5-1-6 Billion dollars in revenue next year.
Last edited:
Those numbers are a little eye-opening. The average iTunes account is spending about $13 dollars a year combined on ALL content. Given that there some people who spend A LOT, I'm guessing the median and the mode spending are ZERO.
I think what these numbers show is that consumers are unwilling to pay for content of any type, other than a small minority of customers. Sure, Apple has the high-spenders, but all the recent growth in iOS usage has been from customers who spend NOTHING on content -- in other words, just like Android customers.
Both good news and bad news for Apple. Little growth potential for online revenues, but hell, Apple could lose a ton of market share, and still have developers flock to the platform (assuming they kept the big-spenders).
Also, all those consumers currently spending ZERO on content -- I don't see them all of a sudden paying $10 per month for streaming rights. Forget it about it. No money to be made from music.
I think what these numbers show is that consumers are unwilling to pay for content of any type, other than a small minority of customers. Sure, Apple has the high-spenders, but all the recent growth in iOS usage has been from customers who spend NOTHING on content -- in other words, just like Android customers.
Both good news and bad news for Apple. Little growth potential for online revenues, but hell, Apple could lose a ton of market share, and still have developers flock to the platform (assuming they kept the big-spenders).
Also, all those consumers currently spending ZERO on content -- I don't see them all of a sudden paying $10 per month for streaming rights. Forget it about it. No money to be made from music.