Whats up with their weak ass upgrades? i mean come one man! Before i start my rant.. i love my new mac. to death. ill never own another pc (Notebook anyways, perhaps a desktop in the future depending on how the new iMac look) I understand the 13 i guess just because its so small. But for the 15s and 17s? 250$ for a single stupid 0.1Gz upgrade and a little more cache? I think that should be an option for 100$ and there should be AT LEAST TWO MORE OPTIONS. i mean dell gives you like 5 or 6 sometimes.. There should be a 2.2 2.3 2.7 or like 3.1 for the CPU the GPU im not in dire need of, the card in the 2.2 is substantial for most users. but HDD ? i think 7200 should be standard, then an option for a 10k and a 12k hard drive!!! these are PRO COMPUTERS!! and space, all should have 750 gig and options for 1 and 2 TB. I would not mind paying some cash for these hefty upgrades either.. If i could get a 15" quadcore clocking at like 2.9 Ghz id be the most happy computer user ever!!!! i KNOW apple can pull this off, so why aren't they?? Do you think its because if they did it would mean just wayyyyyy to big of an advance in one refresh and they'd have trouble beating it in the next refresh? i just don't think its fair they give you one upgrade option and its usually not worth it. The only option that is a must have really is the HD screen. anything else i can live without, well i say that but their 128 SSD is pretty amazing. i do really wish i could have a much higher clocked CPU, i would mind the sound or heat wither, it'd be TOTALLY WORTH it, IMHO. is anyone with me on these> Would you pay 400$ to set your computer on a 2.7 or 500 on a 3.0 clockspeed in a quadcore computer? it'd be so amazing!