Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As a long time UNIX sysadmin this still blows me away. They converted over a billion devices to a whole new filesystem successfully, and not only that, they did it with a point release, not even a major iOS update.

This gained me a lot of additional respect for the OS team at Apple. They absolutely know their stuff.

Yep. Part of how they did it is that a previous minor release included a dry run, where the OS would try the conversion, collect diagnostics, then undo it.

All users really noticed about that was an unusually slow upgrade.
 
I’ve set my Auto Update to off but not so I can download it sooner but so I can download when I want to. I usually wait a while and see if there are problems with any new release and if so I don’t download until they have been fixed.

Currently there is a reported iPhone 13 battery problem with IOS 15.0 and until I hear that either the problem really doesn’t exist or that it’s been solved I’m not downloading.
 
I have auto updates turned on.. why do I have to keep telling it ... yes, install now... and put my passcode in, etc.... I'm explicit telling it ... and I still have to intervene multiple times...
 
So in other words let the Guinea pig early adopters beta test the rollout “release” before Apple pushes it to the broader ecosystem. Forget iOS, Why is Monterey seemingly so buggy ??
hopefully with a redesigned mac mini, macbook air, mac pro, and maybe even imac pro, people will focus more on these new machines than the operating system itself in the 2022-2023 macOS. this way, they can do no new feature upgrades with monterey and use this time solely to fix macOS
 
Auto update actually NEVER happens on any of my apple tv's. I have auto update on, and mine are all still running 3 point versions behind. I always have to manually trigger those if I want the latest.
 
hopefully with a redesigned mac mini, macbook air, mac pro, and maybe even imac pro, people will focus more on these new machines than the operating system itself in the 2022-2023 macOS. this way, they can do no new feature upgrades with monterey and use this time solely to fix macOS
I got a hard kernel panic when trying to initiate sidecar on macOS 12.3. I was getting hard kernel panics in 12.2.1 and 12.3 beta when waking from sleep with a TS4 attached. Apple makes great hardware but macOS needs to be debugged.
 
Always kind of presumed this was the case, I remember the days when new updates would take hours to download because of the immediate demand, then Apple started rolling out update availability to mitigate the issue; this seems like the logical next step, short of spending massively to increase server capacity just for the few times a year Apple releases a major update. I do hope they have an altered procedure when updating immediately is imperative, such as when a security flaw is reported.
 
erm, wasn't it also him who oversaw all the bugs of the past dunno how much years?

I'll agree that software quality has been down in recent years. I'm not sure if that says much about Federighi, Forstall, or Serlet, though. The user base has grown more than tenfold compared to Forstall and Serlet. Overall complexity is way up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whatgift
man they weren't wrong' attitude
ahaha reading comprehension.. anyway you fall in the same category. so sad to see people who never known THAT Apple we all loved and why some people picked up this ultimate 'oh man they weren't wrong' attitude
Grammarly can’t even attempt to make sense of this run- on, so I don’t know why you’re using this to judge someone’s reading comprehension, lol.
 
This is absolute nonsense.
Do your testing in house & roll out to everyone at the same time.
This company is insane
Uhhh, no? I don’t think there could be an argument for this at any point in time, ever. You do understand resources are finite, right?
 
Staggered update rollouts are common and smart. If any issues arise with the early upgrades (which can absolutely happen), they can pause the rollout and make the fix before too many people are affected.

I just leave auto update on and I get updated when it’s my turn. I have work to do and no time for problems. I don’t mind waiting.
 
This misses the point of the original "Guinea pig early adopters" comment. It is not only that the updates would be released with bugs, they Craig here has explicitly acknowledged that they release the updates with this in mind SO THAT they can get "feedbacks" BEFORE rolling out to other users. This is just a nicer way of saying those who update early are guinea pigs. You might have no problem with it, but this is what Craig is saying. As for me, I cannot disagree with those who have paid good money for their devices to think that a final release should not be a test. "Good luck with that" is not an argument, but an acknowledgment that for Apple to give us what we paid for depends on "luck," and of course, the expression just means "it's not going to happen." And the problem is, we all agree with that.
No, it's not. Bugs are only part of the equation. Apple is also looking at how the general public accepts an update. There are updates that introduce functionality that pass all quality standards, that are accepted by beta users (who have different pyschographics than the average user), but end up being rejected by the public at large. By the time that Apple makes a public release, they have general confidence that the fruit is ripe. Apple can only pass out so much fruit at a time in an orderly fashion (server capacity)... and if it helps prevent rotten spots (bugs) while at the same time ensuring everyone enjoys the flavor (changes and additions to functionality) they aren't crossing their fingers and hoping for luck. They are using a strategy that helps with quality control and satisfaction. It's not a 2nd beta test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whatgift
Then they need to pull security updates out and update them all separately at night as smaller patch updates. Not good to have zero day vulnerabilities on user's devices for four weeks until it gets auto updates.
 
This doesn’t explain why the devices ask constantly if you would like to update that evening, only to fail to update. This has happened to me multiple times on many devices.
 
Last edited:
About app updates: on App Store Connect, developers can choose to intentionally delay rollout for all users by up to 7 days. The delay is then automatically managed by Apple. The decision is completely up to the developer, but I know many developers that choose this option (most developers who have many users).
 
So then how about adding another option under automatic update, for “slow” and “fast”? Slow can remain the default, and anyone who would normally update manually can select Fast so that their device updates as soon as the auto update criteria is met.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.