But iOS has pirated apps too, so the app store didn't stop that.Sideloading will cause app piracy which is bad to app developer. Look what happened on Android. Paid apps got pirated the minute they sent it to Play Store.
But iOS has pirated apps too, so the app store didn't stop that.Sideloading will cause app piracy which is bad to app developer. Look what happened on Android. Paid apps got pirated the minute they sent it to Play Store.
Lockdown macOS then. With apple silicon, there is literally no reason apple can’t do that.Why do you think macOS has a higher virus/malware threat than iOS despite there being more than 10x the users on iOS?
Last bit is hilarious…I think it’s in Apple’s best interest to limit Safari and web browsers. Currently, it’s possible for people to go to websites that don’t accept Apple Pay. Absurd! Did you know that people get scammed via web browsers all the time?
Apple needs more control, not less. Any power taken from them is a direct threat to my personal data, my safety, and our democracy.
Android still exists because Google subsidizes it like all their products by picking up customer info in order to sell targeted advertising. (Same reason they pay apple billions per year to be the default search engine in safari.)If all that is true, how does Android still exist?
How does Windows? macOS? Linux? ChromeOS?
Why is iOS so fragile compared to, you know, literally every other operating system in existence?
I’d rather pay $1.50 for a safe app than save 50¢ by buying outside the store.
Also, who’s to say the app vendor will reduce prices? If they don’t have to sell in the AppStore, they could sell exclusively via side loading at the same price and capture apple’s commission for themselves.
Ah yes, because macs are completely flooded with malware all the time ?It’s true. And we all know it. Even if you want differently.
Up until now, Mac has had far fewer applications because it is such a small platform compared to iOS.Lockdown macOS then. With apple silicon, there is literally no reason apple can’t do that.
Oh wait there are scam apps on App Store already. Wonder how many scam apps on Mac App Store right now and how expensive they are.
This is one thing I’m still a bit shocked after a full year of Apple Silicon Mac release. Apple really should’ve just lockdown macOS like iOS from macOS Big Sur. No technical reason why not to. Xcode is IN the App Store. No reason Adobe software, Carbon Clone Copy, iStats, Cinebench R23, and thousands of other utilities can’t exist in Mac App Store. /sIf Apple could lock the Mac down the way they lock down iOS without inviting a PR conflagration they'd do it in a second.
As a bonus, you'd finally see Apple take gaming on the Mac seriously if that were to happen, because they'd be able to take their cut off the top of everything the way they do on iOS.
Edit: typo
TLDR version of this is Apple disabling “sideloading” in macOS cause all of those points you mentioned are risks on macOS too.But sideload? No thanks. Just buy an Android phone if that's what you want to do.
Clearly you've never heard of macOS.I mean he's not wrong. Apple just needs to stick to their core privacy values to not look like hypocrites.
People choose iOS BECAUSE it's a better working closed ecosystem. You want a free-for-all OS where submitted App Store apps aren't reviewed then go get yourself an Android phone.
I don’t see that future coming anytime soon ever since they disable “legit” sideloading almost any iOS apps from Big Sur 11.3. Plus iOS apps are traditionally designed for touch input, something Mac doesn’t have. That could mean lots of extra work for devs for little to no gain.Up until now, Mac has had far fewer applications because it is such a small platform compared to iOS.
I’m sure we will see more differences in how apple handles side loading of Mac apps as the M chip rollout continues.
One change underway has been for apple to make it far easier for devs to port an iOS app to macOS.
I imagine that eventually apple will link macOS and iOS app sales together. Eventually requiring a Mac port to be made by larger devs or kicking an app out of iOS App Store should a dev offer a side load app for Mac.
It just works, huh? That motto got abandoned years ago.... since Apple products no longer "just work", tragically. Thanks timmy.Apple's system isn't perfect, but for the most part, it works. Keep the loop closed!
From when our world becomes so black and white with no shade in between? Never? Good.Maybe nonsense to you because you don’t understand. An opening is an opening, no matter how large. I don’t think most people were opposed to the idea of stopping the spread of child pornography — it was the idea that scanning would have created the potential for problems by needing an opening to accomplish it.
Side loading would require an opening in the OS, and this has the potential for creating problems.
If you oppose CSAM scanning, you should automatically oppose side loading of apps.
What a simple polarised way demonising side-loading, as If apple engineers would suddenly lose all of their power for limiting side-loading apps to do certain things.The second side loading is allowed Facebook and Google will be off the App Store and be telling people to side load their apps to continue using their services. With Apple no longer able to scrutinise their apps I can see both of those companies bypassing iOS security and API restrictions to spy on people. The Facebook app would probably have the camera, microphone and GPS running all day regardless of the battery drain.
Apple could build world’s best content consumption device with hardware power matching server farms and people would still use it for checking twitter.Apple’s full potential will never be unlocked if you they keep their ecosystem shut. All this power only meant to browse the internet or read books.
And people think that sideloading apps will mean that they can do more with us not stopping them. It doesn‘t take a developer to know that you simply can‘t do these things anymore on iOS without the user knowing. But obviously their marketing feeds on people being misinformed.From when our world becomes so black and white with no shade in between? Never? Good.
Besides, simple thinking like this is why armchair Craig can never be the next Craig.
What a simple polarised way demonising side-loading, as If apple engineers would suddenly lose all of their power for limiting side-loading apps to do certain things.
Apple could build world’s best content consumption device with hardware power matching server farms and people would still use it for checking twitter.
Black and White thinking is simple and super easy to understand, and as such, reinforcing it is easy too. It’s psychological stuff, though I don’t know much deeper of this thought process.Exactly. If Retroarch is responsible for whatever people do with it, then wouldn't that make Apple responsible if someone used Safari to do something illegal? Or if they used iTunes to listen to or view pirated content?
How can people be so incapable of thinking these things through on even the shallowest level?
The issue isn't user choice - its Facebook pushing users outside the store so they can monitor behavior and track users across the entire internet (again, but this time without getting their enterprise certificates revoked).It’s a fair point, but the option should be given to the people who purchase the hardware.
If they want to implement limitations on warranty coverage or support, that’s their perogative.
If your app is outside the play store, it doesn't necessarily get access to any play services. Play services and the Google official apps are how Android plays lip service to open source (via AOSP) while still locking manufacturers into agreements and developers into the play store.except that’s not the case at the Playstore either
Well that kind of makes the point. Apple already has a system in place for identified developers. I understand that can be subverted in some places, but it would staunch a lot of the rampant malware, especially with the notarization process.Boot into rescue mode and open terminal, type "csrutil disable" and you'll really open 'er up.
Some things are not preventable via API.I appreciate Federighi's admission that iOS and iPad OS are too fragile to accommodate sideloading without compromising security. Of my many Android devices (all of which support sideloading) none of them have suffered security-wise because of sideloading.
If you have interactive presentation and network access, you can attempt to phish banking credentials. You can't really sandbox malicious behavior, you can only protect against specific attacker models.couldnt they simply block sideloaded apps to gain access to the security features / sandbox or whatever would be the right terms and have them run in a sheltered „box“. Imagine an emulator to run sideloaded apps or something, keeping it separated
Yep, this is exactly why you can't side load in macO—erm…
Yes it does. People need to just stop spreading lies.The Mac doesn’t have these issues. Sure android has malware from time to time, but are the floodgates really open? Nope. Give the users the choice and if they side load and their phone craps out, limit warranty or something.
Uh....me and everyone of my friends and family ONLY choose Apple due to being closed instead of Android. I would absolutely LOVE to get a MUCH BETTER phone for $500 Android than iPhone, but the locked down experience is worth it. Unless you are saying us 15 people are the only 15 people in the planet that thinks this way?Where did you draw that conclusion, can you point me to source?