Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why do you think macOS has a higher virus/malware threat than iOS despite there being more than 10x the users on iOS?
Lockdown macOS then. With apple silicon, there is literally no reason apple can’t do that.
Oh wait there are scam apps on App Store already. Wonder how many scam apps on Mac App Store right now and how expensive they are.
 
I think it’s in Apple’s best interest to limit Safari and web browsers. Currently, it’s possible for people to go to websites that don’t accept Apple Pay. Absurd! Did you know that people get scammed via web browsers all the time?

Apple needs more control, not less. Any power taken from them is a direct threat to my personal data, my safety, and our democracy.
Last bit is hilarious…
Democracy through autocracy?

Seriously, Apple really should’ve preload more “non-removable” apps on each category and deny warranty if you download third party apps and causes issues. Apple approved way or no way. Absolute lockdown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surne and Wildkraut
If all that is true, how does Android still exist?

How does Windows? macOS? Linux? ChromeOS?

Why is iOS so fragile compared to, you know, literally every other operating system in existence?
Android still exists because Google subsidizes it like all their products by picking up customer info in order to sell targeted advertising. (Same reason they pay apple billions per year to be the default search engine in safari.)

Without these services Google wouldn’t be able to charge the ad rates that it does.
 
I’d rather pay $1.50 for a safe app than save 50¢ by buying outside the store.

Also, who’s to say the app vendor will reduce prices? If they don’t have to sell in the AppStore, they could sell exclusively via side loading at the same price and capture apple’s commission for themselves.

The services I am talking are already being sold and are cheaper off of iOS (if they can be purchased on iOS at all). Things like streaming streaming services and, yes, cross-platform mobile games.

There’s a reason why there are so many apps that, once downloaded, are nothing but a log in screen. Think about why.
 
Lockdown macOS then. With apple silicon, there is literally no reason apple can’t do that.
Oh wait there are scam apps on App Store already. Wonder how many scam apps on Mac App Store right now and how expensive they are.
Up until now, Mac has had far fewer applications because it is such a small platform compared to iOS.

I’m sure we will see more differences in how apple handles side loading of Mac apps as the M chip rollout continues.

One change underway has been for apple to make it far easier for devs to port an iOS app to macOS.

I imagine that eventually apple will link macOS and iOS app sales together. Eventually requiring a Mac port to be made by larger devs or kicking an app out of iOS App Store should a dev offer a side load app for Mac.
 
If Apple could lock the Mac down the way they lock down iOS without inviting a PR conflagration they'd do it in a second.

As a bonus, you'd finally see Apple take gaming on the Mac seriously if that were to happen, because they'd be able to take their cut off the top of everything the way they do on iOS.

Edit: typo
This is one thing I’m still a bit shocked after a full year of Apple Silicon Mac release. Apple really should’ve just lockdown macOS like iOS from macOS Big Sur. No technical reason why not to. Xcode is IN the App Store. No reason Adobe software, Carbon Clone Copy, iStats, Cinebench R23, and thousands of other utilities can’t exist in Mac App Store. /s
But sideload? No thanks. Just buy an Android phone if that's what you want to do.
TLDR version of this is Apple disabling “sideloading” in macOS cause all of those points you mentioned are risks on macOS too.
 
I mean he's not wrong. Apple just needs to stick to their core privacy values to not look like hypocrites.

People choose iOS BECAUSE it's a better working closed ecosystem. You want a free-for-all OS where submitted App Store apps aren't reviewed then go get yourself an Android phone.
Clearly you've never heard of macOS.
 
Up until now, Mac has had far fewer applications because it is such a small platform compared to iOS.

I’m sure we will see more differences in how apple handles side loading of Mac apps as the M chip rollout continues.

One change underway has been for apple to make it far easier for devs to port an iOS app to macOS.

I imagine that eventually apple will link macOS and iOS app sales together. Eventually requiring a Mac port to be made by larger devs or kicking an app out of iOS App Store should a dev offer a side load app for Mac.
I don’t see that future coming anytime soon ever since they disable “legit” sideloading almost any iOS apps from Big Sur 11.3. Plus iOS apps are traditionally designed for touch input, something Mac doesn’t have. That could mean lots of extra work for devs for little to no gain.

If apple somehow claims 90% of global computer marketshare we’d see some dramatic shift. But before that, I doubt it.
 
Maybe nonsense to you because you don’t understand. An opening is an opening, no matter how large. I don’t think most people were opposed to the idea of stopping the spread of child pornography — it was the idea that scanning would have created the potential for problems by needing an opening to accomplish it.

Side loading would require an opening in the OS, and this has the potential for creating problems.

If you oppose CSAM scanning, you should automatically oppose side loading of apps.
From when our world becomes so black and white with no shade in between? Never? Good.
Besides, simple thinking like this is why armchair Craig can never be the next Craig.
The second side loading is allowed Facebook and Google will be off the App Store and be telling people to side load their apps to continue using their services. With Apple no longer able to scrutinise their apps I can see both of those companies bypassing iOS security and API restrictions to spy on people. The Facebook app would probably have the camera, microphone and GPS running all day regardless of the battery drain.
What a simple polarised way demonising side-loading, as If apple engineers would suddenly lose all of their power for limiting side-loading apps to do certain things.
Apple’s full potential will never be unlocked if you they keep their ecosystem shut. All this power only meant to browse the internet or read books.
Apple could build world’s best content consumption device with hardware power matching server farms and people would still use it for checking twitter.
 
From when our world becomes so black and white with no shade in between? Never? Good.
Besides, simple thinking like this is why armchair Craig can never be the next Craig.

What a simple polarised way demonising side-loading, as If apple engineers would suddenly lose all of their power for limiting side-loading apps to do certain things.

Apple could build world’s best content consumption device with hardware power matching server farms and people would still use it for checking twitter.
And people think that sideloading apps will mean that they can do more with us not stopping them. It doesn‘t take a developer to know that you simply can‘t do these things anymore on iOS without the user knowing. But obviously their marketing feeds on people being misinformed.

Sideloaded apps have to answer to the same laws of physics as do apps on the App Store. Only difference is that they passed the censorship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirasaki
Exactly. If Retroarch is responsible for whatever people do with it, then wouldn't that make Apple responsible if someone used Safari to do something illegal? Or if they used iTunes to listen to or view pirated content?

How can people be so incapable of thinking these things through on even the shallowest level?
Black and White thinking is simple and super easy to understand, and as such, reinforcing it is easy too. It’s psychological stuff, though I don’t know much deeper of this thought process.
 
It’s a fair point, but the option should be given to the people who purchase the hardware.

If they want to implement limitations on warranty coverage or support, that’s their perogative.
The issue isn't user choice - its Facebook pushing users outside the store so they can monitor behavior and track users across the entire internet (again, but this time without getting their enterprise certificates revoked).

You also have the issue that if you can enable side loading, certain apps (like bank apps) will try to detect that is enabled and disable functionality like they do today with other root kit detections.
 
except that’s not the case at the Playstore either
If your app is outside the play store, it doesn't necessarily get access to any play services. Play services and the Google official apps are how Android plays lip service to open source (via AOSP) while still locking manufacturers into agreements and developers into the play store.

This lip service is also why Google has sometimes faced regulatory scrutiny that Apple hasn't.
 
As several people have pointed out - the jailbreak option is the one and only way to side load apps. Let’s say Apple agrees to provide an option to Jailbreak device in the settings, probably near the delete device option.

Imagine the warning:
“In Jailbreaking the device, it will no longer be unable to access the App Store, Apple software updates, Apple support and Apple warranty. Side loading software on to the device may cause the functionality of your device to fail. You may also lose functionality and support for purchased apps. To reverse a Jailbreak, requires full delete & reset to factory settings. Are you sure you want to Jailbreak the device?”
Good luck!
 
Boot into rescue mode and open terminal, type "csrutil disable" and you'll really open 'er up.
Well that kind of makes the point. Apple already has a system in place for identified developers. I understand that can be subverted in some places, but it would staunch a lot of the rampant malware, especially with the notarization process.
 
I appreciate Federighi's admission that iOS and iPad OS are too fragile to accommodate sideloading without compromising security. Of my many Android devices (all of which support sideloading) none of them have suffered security-wise because of sideloading.
Some things are not preventable via API.

Say for example that a malicious developer wants to trick you into installing an app, then provides an interface to try to get you to enter your banking credentials.

The stores not only do an initial review, but do identity verification of the authors before letting software be published. This means both the opportunity to try and catch the scam before it is pushed out, and to better enable legal prosecution of the people performing the scam.

couldnt they simply block sideloaded apps to gain access to the security features / sandbox or whatever would be the right terms and have them run in a sheltered „box“. Imagine an emulator to run sideloaded apps or something, keeping it separated
If you have interactive presentation and network access, you can attempt to phish banking credentials. You can't really sandbox malicious behavior, you can only protect against specific attacker models.
 
The Mac doesn’t have these issues. Sure android has malware from time to time, but are the floodgates really open? Nope. Give the users the choice and if they side load and their phone craps out, limit warranty or something.
Yes it does. People need to just stop spreading lies.


The only reason macOS is as "secure" as it is, is because Windows has the most marketshare, most companies back-bone environments are Windows based.
 
People really need to stop being so selfish when it comes to any security on their devices. So what if I know how to prevent side-loading, but does my grandma? AND when my grandma DOES get malware, my contact info will now be exposed because I am in the contact list. Which leads to spam calls, emails and more unwanted communication. Also, any device infected can be turned into a zombie system used to send those unwanted communications or participate in DDoS attacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crazytrain
Where did you draw that conclusion, can you point me to source?
Uh....me and everyone of my friends and family ONLY choose Apple due to being closed instead of Android. I would absolutely LOVE to get a MUCH BETTER phone for $500 Android than iPhone, but the locked down experience is worth it. Unless you are saying us 15 people are the only 15 people in the planet that thinks this way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr.PT
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.