Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,113
38,868


Apple announced an overwhelming number of changes to the app ecosystem in the European Union yesterday, and with the flood of information, there may have been a few details that were overlooked by developers and device users.

App-Store-vs-EU-Feature-2.jpg

We've rounded up a handful of lesser-known details that offer some clarification on what these updates mean for the iPhone and other products.

The iPad and Other Devices

The Digital Markets Act required Apple to make changes to both "iOS" and to the "App Store," with the European Commission defining iOS as the operating system that runs on the iPhone, and the "App Store" as a cross-platform entity that operates on all of Apple's operating systems.

For that reason, some of the changes that Apple is making are exclusive to the iPhone, while others are coming to iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, and watchOS.
Limited to the iPhone

  • Alternative app marketplaces - Alternative app marketplaces will only be available on the iPhone, not the iPad, so there will not be an option to install a third-party app store on an iPad. There will also be no way to install an app from an alternative app store on an iPad. Alternative marketplace apps will be iPhone only.
  • App notarization - Notarization is linked to alternative app marketplaces and will apply to iOS apps, not iPadOS apps.
  • Alternative browser engines - Allowing browsers to use an alternative engine is a feature that is also iPhone only. Chrome, for example, would only be able to use a non-WebKit engine for its Chrome for iPhone app, not the Chrome for iPad app.
  • NFC access - Banking and wallet apps on iPhone can access NFC technology and users can set alternative contactless payment apps as default.
App Store Changes for iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS

  • Apple's new business terms - The new business terms, which come with a Core Technology Fee and reduced App Store commissions, are applicable to all platforms.
  • Third-party payments - Developers can opt out of In-App Purchases, instead using a third-party payment service provider for digital goods and services.
  • App Store labels - When an app uses alternative payment processing, it will say so on the App Store product page and on an in-app disclosure sheet that warns customers that a developer is directing them to transact with an alternative payment processor.
  • Payment link-outs - Developers can include a link to allow users to complete a transaction on the developer's website, and can also let users know about promotions, discounts, and deals available outside of their apps.

Default App Marketplaces

iPhone users in Europe can choose to set an alternative app marketplace as the default on their device as required under the DMA. This feature doesn't do much other than show results from the alternative app marketplace in Spotlight search when the search contains something that is available in that marketplace.

App Marketplace Requirements

App marketplaces need to provide Apple with proof of solvency in the form of a $1m euro letter of credit. While apps installed through marketplaces do not have to pay a 0.50 euro Core Technology Fee for the first 1 million "first installs" of an app, that does not apply to app marketplaces. The fee has to be paid right away.

Developers who want to create an app marketplace need to have a presence in the European Union.

App marketplaces only have to pay the Core Technology Fee for app marketplace installs. The fee for individual apps will be paid by those apps, not by the marketplace that they're on.

An app marketplace may not have just a single app in it, because there is a requirement that marketplaces be fair to developers. Marketplaces can set requirements, such as all games or all educational apps, but all apps in that category must be able to apply to be a part of that marketplace.

App Marketplace Installation

An app marketplace will be able to be installed as an app through Safari or another web browser, from the app marketplace's developer.

App Marketplace Limitations and Features

Marketplace apps are compatible with core iOS features. They will show up in Spotlight, can work with most Screen Time features, and are included in iCloud backups.

Screen Time purchase restrictions will not be available for app marketplace apps, nor will Family Purchase Sharing or universal purchase.

Apple will not market alternative app stores, or present them as options to users. Developers will need to create their own audience for their marketplaces. Apple also will have no say in refunds or subscription management tools, as the user must go to the marketplace for these options.

Managing Alternative Marketplace Apps

If an alternative marketplace app is deleted from an iPhone, the apps that were installed through that marketplace won't be able to be updated until the marketplace is reinstalled.

Users will be able to see which marketplace an app was downloaded from in the Settings app.

Adopting Apple's New Business Terms

Developers who opt in to Apple's new business terms, including the Core Technology Fee and reduced commissions, cannot go back to the prior system. It is a one-time change.

Agreeing to the new business terms is done on a per-account level, not per-app.

Notarization and Review

While Notarization will scan for malware, viruses, and ensure that an app does what it says it does, Apple will have less control over content. Copyright violations, IP theft, and other violations will need to be reported to individual app marketplaces, not to Apple.

TestFlight

Developers can use TestFlight to test an app that is being developed for an alternative marketplace, even if that app will not be distributed through the App Store.

NFC

The NFC changes apply to countries in the European Economic Area, not just EU countries. The European Economic Area also includes Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, countries that are not in the European Union.

Other Questions

Have other questions about how the app ecosystem in the EU has changed? Let us know in the comments below.

Article Link: Apple's EU App Store Changes: iPads, TestFlight, Default Stores and More
 
  • Angry
Reactions: gusmula
I think it's insulting that Apple only enabled these new capabilities in the EU, and only because they were forced to, rather than do it worldwide like they did USB-C on the iPhone 15 series.

It's incredibly petty and they're doing the absolute minimum to comply, to the point that I suspect the EU will spank them over some of it, like the "core technology fee".
 
The EU gets a potentially fragmented experience between the iPhone and iPad.

Love it! Way to go EU! LULZ!

Hopefully the EU consumers will complain to their brainless bureaucrats about their ruined their experience.
 
Last edited:
How will they verify if a user is in the European Union? Surely not just by the account region? That would be foolish.
 
I think it's insulting that Apple only enabled these new capabilities in the EU, and only because they were forced to, rather than do it worldwide like they did USB-C on the iPhone 15 series.

It's incredibly petty and they're doing the absolute minimum to comply, to the point that I suspect the EU will spank them over some of it, like the "core technology fee".

You realize they've been going over these plans with the bureaucrats, right? They didn't just invent this.


Can't wait for someone to complain that they can't use other wallets on iPad. :rolleyes:
 
So i'm a bit confused here........are these changes mainly bc consumers were complaining and wanted it, or bc the developers were complaining and wanted it? I feel like this is a solution to a problem that the majority of consumers weren't actually complaining about.......
 
Why are some against this? Imagine if on windows or Mac apple or Microsoft forced you to download approved application through their exclusive App Store?

Windows having the option to download applications from web browsers is excellent and the ability to have other stores like Steam is great for innovation and to not create monopolies.

Apple if anything should be forced to have people be able to select the stores they wish to install alongside App Store. Moreover, other stores should have the same access to features and function that are built in.

Don’t be so protective as if you are apple share holders.
 
So i'm a bit confused here........are these changes mainly bc consumers were complaining and wanted it, or bc the developers were complaining and wanted it? I feel like this is a solution to a problem that the majority of consumers weren't actually complaining about.......

It's because Spotify, Epic, and some others made contributions to the right people so they can exploit iPhone users but not have to pay Apple for the privilege.
 
Nah, I blame Apple. They could have done this worldwide, but chose to be petty about it. They weren't petty about USB-C, and did a great job there, so I had greater expectations. Figures Apple would disappoint me.
It isn’t petty. This goes against Apple’s walled garden that they chose when they made iOS. They are being forced by government to make these changes, so will do their best to make sure it is limited effect on them and the security we iPhone users expect. Absolutely Apple is going to get calls for support and refunds for apps that weren’t purchased from The App Store and screwed up people’s iphones. For people that don’t like the walled garden there is an alternative.
 
App Store was so simple

and then came EU screwing everything up, making everything extremely complex. terrible for the user and developers.

I think it will be most terrible for the developers:

Developers who opt in to Apple's new business terms, including the Core Technology Fee and reduced commissions, cannot go back to the prior system. It is a one-time change.

Agreeing to the new business terms is done on a per-account level, not per-app.
 
It's because Spotify, Epic, and some others made contributions to the right people so they can exploit iPhone users but not have to pay Apple for the privilege.

Yet they will end up paying for the privilege (Core Technology Fee for both their App Stores and App installs). So they cannot exploit Apple and iPhone users for free. There's some justice in this.
 
You realize they've been going over these plans with the bureaucrats, right? They didn't just invent this.
From https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-plan...ions-for-downloads-outside-app-store-f464f426 (two days ago):

“Officials from the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, have been holding meetings in recent months with Apple and other tech companies to discuss the new rules. Apple hasn’t provided a final package describing its solution to the commission or tested its plans with market participants.

Once it does, the commission will review the full package to look at whether it will make the market more open and contestable, and whether the company’s plans meet all the individual provisions of the law, according to a person familiar with its plans.”
 
An app marketplace may not have just a single app in it, because there is a requirement that marketplaces be fair to developers. Marketplaces can set requirements, such as all games or all educational apps, but all apps in that category must be able to apply to be a part of that marketplace.

So, if for example Epic launches their own app store, they need to allow other games in it as well. Or if Spotify launches their own app store, they need to allow other music streaming apps in the store.

Great for competition, which they wanted :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.