Good! "Freemium" apps are a scourge on the world! Let them all eat V-Bucks!
Last edited:
As @truthsteve mentioned, existing developers are not required to accept the new capabilities and terms.But wouldn't it also deter people from their own store:
And what can devs do? Move to android, anything else? If I understand correctly, this is basically fee for access to devtools.It's basically the same greedy BS that Unity tried last year with the fee for every install. They will be backpedaling for sure ...
Maybe Apple was actually inspired by this. “What a great idea!”It's basically the same greedy BS that Unity tried last year with the fee for every install.
They will. The goal is to steer developers to stay on the old arrangement. They’d offer it everywhere if it were somehow their preferred choice.As @truthsteve mentioned, existing developers are not required to accept the new capabilities and terms.
However, I am not sure whether new developers will be given the same option.
It’s a fee basically for access to devtools. DMA can force Apple to offer access to those for free? Don’t think so.Nice try Apple. The fee clearly violates the DMA regulation.
Apple has to try because they want money, but they'll be shot down in courts in no time.
The only winners here will be the lawyers.
View attachment 2341230
Regulation - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex
eur-lex.europa.eu
This is good, it means it will be more economical to just use the default app store. I would like Apple to win this va. EU so they give up.
Nice try Apple. The fee clearly violates the DMA regulation.
Apple has to try because they want money, but they'll be shot down in courts in no time.
The only winners here will be the lawyers.
View attachment 2341230
Regulation - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex
eur-lex.europa.eu
Good! "Freemium" apps are a scourge on the world! Let them all eat V-Bucks!
And loose access to majority of USA users? Also those that are more susceptible to pay real money?Wouldn't this just drive app developers over to the android side and just completely leave iOS? Isn't this just like Apple shooting themselves in the foot?![]()
No way for Apple to win this one.
The EU regulation is clear cut about software application stores being "free of charge for the business user."
Apple just wants to do this kicking and screaming. But the end result is still a big L for Apple.
Thankfully the EU still has to approve these rules so they can still veto this. Which I really really hope they do.There we go. Talking about malicious compliance, but worse. Who on earth can easily rack up $48k/mo as freemium app? Does that mean freemium microtransaction model will end as we know it?
The worst part is, iOS devs have no choice but to pay this fee, or suffer being pulled from App Store. And again, Apple doesn’t have to pay this fee themselves while racking up millions of individual install. Who knows how long the “current terms” will last?
If this is not anticompetitive behaviour, I don’t know what it is.
No, the dispute settlement mechanism should be free of charge for the business user. The regulation doesn't state application stores should be free of charge.
Looks like the EU already has grounds in the DMA to squash this attempt to steer devs to the App Store.Nice try Apple. The fee clearly violates the DMA regulation.
Apple has to try because they want money, but they'll be shot down in courts in no time.
The only winners here will be the lawyers.
View attachment 2341241
Regulation - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex
eur-lex.europa.eu
These developers are still benefitting from tools and frameworks that Apple provides for free. Try developing an app using zero Apple frameworks. I'm sure it's *possible*, but how many native apps do it? I suppose there could be an additional option: use no Apple tools or frameworks developing your app and you can pay nothing.