Thanks , that’s great!
So is it exclusive for these new 11/12.9”pro iPad’s, or it also works in air?
Is it too cumberstone?
Will either need the smart connector or the 2nd pencil charging port.
Thanks , that’s great!
So is it exclusive for these new 11/12.9”pro iPad’s, or it also works in air?
Is it too cumberstone?
Same app, presenting a different UI based on whether it’s docked or not.how is that not a compromising experience?
for one, you need to download both Office iPad and Office Mac to the device and keep both updated, taking up double the space.
among a hundred other reasons...
Just by slapping a "Pro" moniker does not turn iPad into a Professional Media Creation machine. That honor currently belongs to a Macintosh line. iPad Pro is just a top tier media consumption machine with aspirations for light media editing.They do not say a lot there!
Clearly there are different use cases for both product types -
BUT it would be great to operate an iPad Pro in more Mac-Like manner if connected
to a keyboard and mouse (e.g. magic keyboard).
Also regardless of whether docked or not - the lack of a Filesystem and File-Selectors is really crippling the iPadPro.
The iPadPro (currently) fully sucks in file management - no "Pro" moniker will change that.
You’re right, you don’t even have to put a Pro on it because the iPad Air is wonderful as a professional media creation machine, too. Good call!Just by slapping a "Pro" moniker does not turn iPad into a Professional Media Creation machine. That honor currently belongs to a Macintosh line. iPad Pro is just a top tier media consumption machine with aspirations for light media editing.
You are not wrong - but there are some additional use-cases.Just by slapping a "Pro" moniker does not turn iPad into a Professional Media Creation machine. That honor currently belongs to a Macintosh line. iPad Pro is just a top tier media consumption machine with aspirations for light media editing.
Yes it is - just not available in 12.9 inchesYou’re right, you don’t even have to put a Pro on it because the iPad Air is wonderful as a professional media creation machine, too. Good call!
the justification is "hope that Apple is improving the iPadOS"Still trying to understand/justify the 16 RAM, specially considering you have to couple it with 1TB storage for a “nicer” price bump.
And, as a bonus, I no longer have to carry a brick around with me to use as a paper weight. Way to go, Apple!You are not wrong - but there are some additional use-cases.
It can serve as an overpowered note-taking engine and general paper replacement.
Since owning the 2018 iPad Pro - I have stopped carrying any paper around.
With the M1 version - I'll have an even more overpowered paper replacement.
If they don‘t start putting the hardware in people’s hands how will they convince anyone to write software that uses it?Still trying to understand/justify the 16 RAM, specially considering you have to couple it with 1TB storage for a “nicer” price bump.
Just curious - what software do you use for note taking? I have 12" 2018 ipad pro as well and I found good use for it - signing all those PDFs with my Apple Pencil. Quite an overkill for that, but nice!You are not wrong - but there are some additional use-cases.
It can serve as an overpowered note-taking engine and general paper replacement.
Since owning the 2018 iPad Pro - I have stopped carrying any paper around.
With the M1 version - I'll have an even more overpowered paper replacement.
They have to give iPadOS [at least in Pro machines] the ability to somehow run MacOS apps, kinda reverse process of what they did in AS MacOS machines. That’s the way to appeal to developers with a very large user base...If they don‘t start putting the hardware in people’s hands how will they convince anyone to write software that uses it?
Or make it worthwhile for those developers to port their apps to iPadOS. Like by making it much easier to do so.They have to give iPadOS [at least in Pro machines] the ability to somehow run MacOS apps, kinda reverse process of what they did in AS MacOS machines. That’s the way to appeal to developers with a very large user base...
The problem I see with that though is if pro mac software can run on an iPad with the mouse and keyboard, then what motivation would the developer have to make a whole other dedicated iPad touch version? Their one application is already on both devices.They have to give iPadOS [at least in Pro machines] the ability to somehow run MacOS apps, kinda reverse process of what they did in AS MacOS machines. That’s the way to appeal to developers with a very large user base...
Notability is a good one.Just curious - what software do you use for note taking? I have 12" 2018 ipad pro as well and I found good use for it - signing all those PDFs with my Apple Pencil. Quite an overkill for that, but nice!
Most of them don’t offer IPadOS today, because user base isn’t sufficiently appealing. That hasn’t changed and this would adress that. On the other hand, the new M1 chip, will surely make it compelling to some apps, to offer iPadOS versions, as they will not be bottlenecked by machine performance, and will benefit greatly from touch interaction, namely those related to AR; 3D visuals; image editing; graphics design; etc. Some already offer versions but they’re are “underpowered”. M1/16GB will adress that. I suspect the real problem is Apple’s unwillingness to allow apps running in iPad, not bounded to App Store 30/15% cut policy...but there could be ways to solve that...as it is some macOS apps offer mobile/constrained versions for “free” which isn’t great, neither to Apple nor it’s user base.The problem I see with that though is if pro mac software can run on an iPad with the mouse and keyboard, then what motivation would the developer have to make a whole other dedicated iPad touch version? Their one application is already on both devices.
can’t use the same app. macos and ipad have different behaviors like where to save the file and every macos app has no awareness of a rear camera.Same app, presenting a different UI based on whether it’s docked or not.
I think your definition of ‘compromise’ revolves around the developer or Apple, instead of the user, where it belongs. To the user, being able to use the iPad as a tablet or as a desktop is a convenience.
Yeah, the closer you look into it, the messier the implementation gets. There are good reasons why no one has done anything like this before and the most effort I’d see Apple putting into this is allowing VM’s in some way and then the user having to build the solution, but there would be no automatic switching.can’t use the same app. macos and ipad have different behaviors like where to save the file and every macos app has no awareness of a rear camera.
no, that’s not my definition. i’m looking at it from both the developer and the user side. both are compromised.
The “where to save” is another API issue at worst and a simple “simulation” of a Mac filesystem presented to the app (to make it so the app developer doesn’t need to care or even know) at best.