Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lol. This guy's been hanging around Phil Schiller way too long. The bs marketing spin is thick with him. "Designed it to be a 'get **** done' machine? If that's the case then everyone involved with Siri at Apple should be fired because Siri is a "can't get **** done" machine.

But it also goes to show how out of touch the execs in Apple are. They're living in their own bubble, living a lie. They simply can't accelerate Siri's growth and improve on it without opening up their walled garden. Can't be done.

Their private 'walled garden' is biting them in the ass. And they know it.
 
Just found another area Siri comes short. Yesterday's Yankees game was postponed and played today, but when I ask Siri for the score it hasn't updated-

IMG_0001.png
 
It's that thing that comes up when you accidentally press the home button for too long, then frantically flail to try and disable for the next 5 seconds.
I don’t know how many times this happened to me! Not too long ago on the iPod Touch 5g I was hurrying up and checking something... and I accidentally pressed the home button too long and it took literally 10 seconds to bring it up just for me to try and get rid of it :p Could’ve went to the other room to get my iPad in the time.
 
I find the Siri voices sound way too bitchy and annoyed like oh my god sorry i bothered to ask while the google voice could read audio books to me to fall asleep at night, so calm.

Dictating messages is also a pain in the lower area bc i spent more time manually correcting errors.

At the end of the day it goes back to the main issue being that i am not much of a talker in the first place, i rather tap a few buttons to get things done
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lopes
Siri has one thing going for her: the multi-language support blows every other AI (actually, all of them combined) out of the water.

Other-language support is a plus as long as it's equally usable and as efficient as the English language which simply isn't the case.

Sure, Siri works well when you give it one of the example instructions but try composing a text message in a non-English language and you quickly see that Siri has a very very long way to go. I use (or try the use) Siri for texting while I'm driving but most of the time I find myself repeating the message over and over because Siri misinterprets some words. I usually end up frustrated (which is a bad thing while you are driving), cancel the message and type it in myself when I park my car.
 
Other-language support is a plus as long as it's equally usable and as efficient as the English language which simply isn't the case.

Sure, Siri works well when you give it one of the example instructions but try composing a text message in a non-English language and you quickly see that Siri has a very very long way to go. I use (or try the use) Siri for texting while I'm driving but most of the time I find myself repeating the message over and over because Siri misinterprets some words. I usually end up frustrated (which is a bad thing while you are driving), cancel the message and type it in myself when I park my car.
Even in the US variant of the English language (i grew up in California which lacks any infections and is very monotone, so a computer should be able to understand it the easiest), Siri still sucks! I just keep Google on my iphones homepage to get my info.

I wish Siri was better, but i gave up on it years ago.
 
says Greg Joswiak, Apple's VP of product marketing. Joswiak says Apple always had big plans for Siri, "this idea of an assistant you could talk to on your phone, and have it do these things for you in a more easy way," but the tech just wasn't good enough. "You know, garbage in, garbage out," he says.

Not liking Joswiak and such an analogy, not to mention his excuse that "someone was holding Apple back!

Apple was handed not just gold nor the ability to smelt it but an entire rich gold mine 2yrs ahead of any competition and while Apple wasted time on various voice narrators for recording Siri began to lag behind the competition in what it Should and Can do!

Apple's history in forethought of a digital AI assistant dates back over 20yrs with The Navigator concept! I still expect siri to be on par with this concept and originally thought Siri would become this in 3yrs. I was so wrong. This is the reason I don't use Siri as much as I'd like on my iPhone vs using it more on ATV4 in the last 2 days Han I have on iPhones in 4yrs since iPhone 4S!

One major gripe I have with Siri is what it lacks for on-board access when not having internet connectivity. A small localization would be nice for:
Announcing date/time, ability to create a local appointment / meetings (since recents contacts and internally cached/saved contacts are on device), launching core apps. The TTC subway here in Toronto gets packed pretty bad during rush hours, and free Wi-Fi (3rd party provided with ad sponsorship affecting how connectivity works) is horrible, and only 1 provider has 3G connectivity throughout 80% of stops.

But I doubt we'd get such a feature as it may significantly bulk up iOS footprint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pilgrim1099
Haha, love it how English in the UK is classed as a dialect variant :)

Somehow I feel Jony Ive may have a word or two with Greg!



Lol. This guy's been hanging around Phil Schiller way too long. The bs marketing spin is thick with him. "Designed it to be a 'get **** done' machine? If that's the case then everyone involved with Siri at Apple should be fired because Siri is a "can't get **** done" machine.

Greg Joswiak, I feel his job overlaps Schillers far to much and needlessly. I really don't think he should be making any public speeches about Siri now that it's under Frederigi's teams responsibility!

Tim internal controls required here.

Amen to that. Siri needs capability like that, plus the ability to retain the context across voice commands. If I ask Siri "How tall was Abraham Lincoln", get my answer, and then ask "When was he president?", I want Siri to know who "he" is and produce the answer.

Exactly! How can Siri be expected as a GTD system if it cannot do what it's supposed to do get things done ?!
[doublepost=1504858324][/doublepost]
I already posted this, but I'll post it again:

YSkOqT3.png


Naturally screwing s*** up since 2011.


ROFLMAO!

My results - at least it understood Mail and showed me results for Canada Post (relevant to my geographical location).
[doublepost=1504858472][/doublepost]
I tried to show off Siri to my new father in law (a few years ago):

Me: "Siri, call my wife".

Siri: "Which wife"

My father in law: "TWhuaaaat"?

-1 Siri

"Pissing myself so hard! You're still married right!!?

The best is if you tried to ask Siri "show me all contacts for Wife"

That would've been priceless.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0517.PNG
    IMG_0517.PNG
    673.6 KB · Views: 99
Haha, love it how English in the UK is classed as a dialect variant :)

Although I laughed at that too, I think they were trying to point out ( albeit cack handedly ) that Siri supports accents, it supports 9 varieties of English.
 
I find Siri to be way better than the competition here in Sweden. I don't use it for Trivial Pursuit things, but to get things done. And I actually think Siri is quite good at it. I'm also thankful that Siri has improved every single year and not become abandonware like e.g. Reminders.app
 
According to Wired, Siri's raw voice recognition capabilities are now able to correctly identify 95 percent of users' speech

Simply rubbish if you are Scottish
[doublepost=1504863505][/doublepost]
Apple is still working to overcome negative perceptions about Siri,
It has to fix siri first.
[doublepost=1504863686][/doublepost]
Unfortunately, a lot of people judge it based on its behavior a few years ago. It has been improved since then.
Yes it has improved but, Nah, still sucks
[doublepost=1504863853][/doublepost]
You know exactly why we can’t replace Siri with another voice assistant.

Because Apple wants to protect its walled garden at all costs and because SIRI is crap and everyone would use an alternative.

Its sad that Apple won't allow us to use a competitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djlythium
Yeah, cos it's the voice recognition and synthesis that cause criticism of Siri, not the fact that it can't do anything useful (except start a timer on my watch, I use that a lot).
 
Apple's problem is that the unwashed want trivial pursuit. Without ties to google, it aint happening.
 
Google assistant beats Siri hands down. voice recognition for place names is great (we have some weird location names in australia. Kalgoorlie, wagga wagga etc.)
Thing that gets me the most is i cannot navigate to business names. One business when i read its name "*** Computers" it gives me directions to a city in NY. 9,626 mi away. Surely machine learning can tell thats not helpful.
 
As someone that's used Android and OK Google for years, I tried Siri for about two months and the only thing I can trust Siri to do for me is give me the current temp when I ask. I will try it to use it more once the phone upgrades next week just see all these improvements everyone is talking about.

Also, even with my accent Google understands me, with Siri I have to sound as robotic as possible.
 
Siri wasn't engineered to do much of anything.
[doublepost=1504873027][/doublepost]
Yeah, it’s been garbage in and garbage out for years and now Apple wants us to forget that?

Not only forget it, but to pay $350 for the HomePod which is powered by crappy Siri.
 
Do you have travel time enabled (Calendar > Default Alert Times > Time to Leave)? Do you have the address for your appointment et into the calendar? Both of those things are required.
You missed the point. If those are disabled and the reasons why Siri can't do the calculation, it should state it. The correct answer should in one way or another address directly to what's being asked, if Siri does have any intelligence at all.
 
I just want Siri to be more context-aware...long story, but I was blanking on Michelle Forbes' name the other day, so i asked Siri "Who played Ensign Ro on Star Trek" and got a series of nonsensical replies.

Then I finally fired up Google, hit the microphone and asked Google, and before my eyes Google corrected "In sign row" to "Ensign Ro" once I said "Star Trek". It also gave me the correct answer.

I don't need to have a conversation with Siri, but I do need her to figure out what I'm asking!
This example is quite similar to how Google auto-completes and -corrects your search queries when you simply type a search into a Google search field. This is an area where Google has many years and probably several magnitudes more of search queries of experience. It is extremely hard to catch up to that or even just to not fall further behind.
[doublepost=1504876359][/doublepost]
Mission accomplished. I can't count how many times I've been chillin' with my friends and having a personal discussion, which tends to go a bit like:

"I get the strangest feeling Steve is just using Sharon as a sort of ego boost. You know what I mean?"

"I don't know what 'I get the strangest feeling Steve is just using Sharon as a sort of ego boost. You know what I mean?' means, but I can search the web for it."

Ahaha, we're such nutters!
I think the idea is that Siri helps with practical matters, and not necessarily with serving up 'mere' information. For example, where and when is a movie playing, but not who is in that movie. In essence, if I want to accomplish a certain task, then Siri can help me. If I just want answers to random questions, that's not what Siri is designed for.

A way to bridge that gap would be to enable Siri to do things like this: 'Ask IMDB what is the latest movie with XYZ'.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.