Cue is Apple's services boat anchor. Beats? iTunes? iBooks? TV?
All fiascos. Time to shake things up.
Sure, those "fiascos" are bigger than all of Facebook.
Cue is Apple's services boat anchor. Beats? iTunes? iBooks? TV?
All fiascos. Time to shake things up.
He's a slimy, cocky, arrogant weasel with all the charm of a dirty rag used to wipe up puke from a bar stool.
Sorry for the vitriol... he really, really, really inspires a burning revulsion in me.
So LOL at aggressive being in quotes. Apple is aggressive. No need to put air quotes around it.
Also - funny how Apple doesn't want a flexible payment schedule over time but yet was trying to negotiate an increase of revenue (above $10) over time. Hypocrisy?
Search. Scrolling through endless menus. Clean, simple.What better user experience does tvOS bring? I'm currently a DirecTV customer and I have no issues with their user interface. I think Apple has a long way to go before it can claim tvOS is a superior user experience.
Phil Schiller is in charge of the App Store now. I'm sure a lot of the services revenue increase is IAP.mas far as Apple Music goes...how many subscribers would Apple have had it been a separate app downloadable via the App Store vs. turning the native music app into an Apple Music app? Also it doesn't look good when an app is completely redesigned only a year after being introduced. Just shows what a cluster-you know what Apple Music was to start out with.Hilarious how this has turned into bashing a man in charge of a portion of the company that's successful enough to bring in enough money to basically be a successful company by itself. Fortune 100 by next year, if I remember correctly.
Phil Schiller is in charge of the App Store now. I'm sure a lot of the services revenue increase is IAP.mas far as Apple Music goes...how many subscribers would Apple have had it been a separate app downloadable via the App Store vs. turning the native music app into an Apple Music app? Also it doesn't look good when an app is completely redesigned only a year after being introduced. Just shows what a cluster-you know what Apple Music was to start out with.
I'm very curious to see if the Apple TV as a platform ever becomes so big that Apple can get these tactics work again. I don't really think that it will. Si ce there are so many competitors (Fire TV, Roku, Chromecast), they should've priced it at $99/$149 for the 32GB/64GB version, not at $149/$199. It's too expensive. If their goal is to reach as many homes as they can, they are doing it wrong at the moment. Maybe we see a price drop in October? Would be nice!
"Following in the footsteps of Netflix and Amazon"? Really? I can't imagine that anybody at Apple seriously thinks this stuff will in any way compete with shows like House of Cards, The Man in the High Castle, or Daredevil.Apple is also following in the footsteps of Netflix and Amazon Video with original programming aimed at promoting services like Apple Music and the App Store.
Three shows are in the works: a dark semi-autobiographical drama starring Dr. Dre called "Vital Signs," a reality series that follows App Store developers called "Planet of the Apps," and a music-based reality show that's a spinoff of "Carpool Karaoke."
I thought Eddy Cue had this reputation as a master negotiatior. Seems like that was a bunch of BS. Without Steve Jobs to close the deal Cue is worthless.
How come they can see that but they cannot see what the state of music would've been without Apple and iTunes? It would be pirate city all over Internet but the record labels have zero vision and can't even understand that Apple saved them.TV companies saw Apple destroy profits in the music market, which in turn led to the death of music itself, and they don't want the same thing to happen to them.
Netflix made a lot of mistakes getting there though. It wasn't an easy road starting their original programming. In order to secure House of Cards they had to commit to producing two seasons from the start which was practically unheard.Netflix original content is very compelling and interesting. The proposed shows from Apple are...not.
Companies making money is greed? You are aware that's what the purpose of a company is, right?Does anyone really care that the world's most valuable company with over a half a trillion buckaroos in cash wants to make MORE money? Where does greed end?
I guess it has no limits.
No... When Jobs brought music labels on board to iTunes the music industry was in a shambles, and the labels would have jumped at anything. They needed Apple. Afterwards, many music execs felt that they were played, ceeding too much to Apple.
It's a much different dynamic today with far more opportunities for content providers, and, with execs remembering how much Aplle got away with in the past with music. Different times. Jobs would not have the leverage today that he had with iTunes.