Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,283
39,094



Apple's health team has faced a series of "high-profile departures" in the past year due to internal disagreements about direction, according to CNBC's Christina Farr, who cites multiple people familiar with the matter.

ecg-watch-person.jpg

The report explains that some Apple employees feel the company could be taking on more ambitious health-related projects like a telemedicine service or simplified insurance billing, while others are satisfied with Apple's focus on wellness and prevention like its ECG app for the Apple Watch:
Tension has been increasing in the health care team in recent months, according to eight people familiar with the situation, although that undercurrent started several years ago. Some employees have become disillusioned with the group's culture, where some have thrived while others feel sidelined and unable to move their ideas forward. Four of the eight noted that some employees hoped to tackle bigger challenges with the health care system, such as medical devices, telemedicine and health payments. Instead the focus has been on features geared to a broad population of healthy users.
The report acknowledges that it is unclear if the attrition rate within the health team is higher than that of other teams at Apple, so part of this could be normal day-to-day differences in opinions and turnover that a large company faces.

When the ECG app for the Apple Watch was unveiled last year, the report claims that some employees were "frustrated" by the negative reaction from some doctors and others in the medical industry, as these employees are said to have pushed for a "small and focused product launch" that would have involved gathering feedback from the medical community to reduce any potential pushback.

Apple did, however, secretly invite cardiologists and other medical experts to its headquarters in California every six months or so while the ECG app was under development, according to the report.

A recent employee morale survey within Apple's health team apparently "showed signs of discontent," leading Apple COO Jeff Williams to speak with several employees to address their concerns. Williams has overseen the health team at Apple for several years, including development of the Apple Watch.

Leadership changes also may have contributed to some of the recent departures.

Below Williams, the health team's leadership is said to include former Adobe executive Kevin Lynch, who is said to oversee software projects like Apple Health Records; Eugene Kim, responsible for Apple Watch hardware, and Sumbul Desai, who oversees the ECG app, Apple Heart Study, and heart health strategy.

Most of the employees who left the health team worked under Desai, per the report:
Other high-level departures from the group over the past few years are Robin Goldstein, who was at Apple for more than two decades and most recently worked on the regulatory side of health before leaving in late 2017; Anil Sethi, a former Apple Health director who left to form a health-tech start-up in late 2017; Stephen Friend, a top Apple researcher who departed at the end of 2017; Charles Schlaff, who worked on Apple Watch before moving over to special projects and left in November of 2018, according to LinkedIn; Craig Mermel, who was in engineering at Apple Health and left to join Google Brain this February; and Yoky Matsouka, who was brought in to lead health but left after less than a year in 2016 and is now a vice president at Google.
Despite the reported struggles, Apple's health team has accomplished a lot over the past few years, including the potentially life saving ECG app for the Apple Watch and Apple Health Records. Apple CEO Tim Cook has said these health efforts will be the company's "greatest contribution to mankind."

Article Link: Apple's Health Team Reportedly Facing Disagreements Over Direction, Leading to Some 'High-Profile Departures'
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
This is life in corporate America.

This is the biggest non story ever.

That said, I’d agree that moving heavy into billing, insurance, or other nitty gritty healthcare related endeavors is questionable.

The healthcare industry is a cluster. Apple needs to focus on the information, tracking, and features aspects to healthcare. Not billing patients and providing insurance benefits. That’s a cluster.
 
Last edited:
The problem with the healthcare industry is that everyone talks about better healthcare, but the principals involved don't want to change their behavior. That includes everyone: Providers (Doctors), Payers (insurance companies), and Patients (you and me).

In any case Apple isn't in a position to advocate for change in the healthcare space, so kudos to management. As a platform company they should be an enabler, and they're doing that quite well.
 
The problem with the healthcare industry is that everyone talks about better healthcare, but the principals involved don't want to change their behavior. That includes everyone: Providers (Doctors), Payers (insurance companies), and Patients (you and me).

In any case Apple isn't in a position to advocate for change in the healthcare space, so kudos to management. As a platform company they should be an enabler, and they're doing that quite well.

But financially speaking, the Doctors and the Principals profiteering at alarming rates see the consumer and cattle w/o end. They don't want improved health for the masses. They want people in constant treatment.

Congress needs to dictate price caps and level the playing field. That takes a collective will to fix what they allow to be broken.
 
Some employees have become disillusioned with the group's culture,

same old story. It's the company "culture" that usually always drives people to quit Apple. Seems like a nightmare place to work. Maybe with Ive now gone, people figure it's time to abandon ship too.
 
And the second coming of the John Sculley phase of Apple is reaching its late stage.

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NMBob
some Apple employees feel the company could be taking on more ambitious health-related projects like a telemedicine service or simplified insurance billing,

Uh… OK?

That seems weird to me. So does Apple Card, though.

When the ECG app for the Apple Watch was unveiled last year, the report claims that some employees were "frustrated" by the negative reaction from some doctors and others in the medical industry, as these employees are said to have pushed for a "small and focused product launch" that would have involved gathering feedback from the medical community to reduce any potential pushback.

Apple did, however, secretly invite cardiologists and other medical experts to its headquarters in California every six months or so while the ECG app was under development, according to the report.

I didn't get the impression that the overall reaction was negative. There were inevitably going to be some cautious doctors. If anything, that's good — skepticism is healthy.

I don't really know where this story is going.

Health research takes time. There are rumors now and then about the Watch measuring blood glucose and… maybe? But also maybe not for another decade. It takes time.
 
I agree with management on this one. the health team seems to be going out of scope for Apple. Apple is a tech company first and they are doing the health tech on the Apple Watch very well. to be expanding to insurance and billing muddles the water too much and the focus becomes less clear
 
same old story. It's the company "culture" that usually always drives people to quit Apple. Seems like a nightmare place to work.

It sounds like basically any non-trivial place to work. A company with 132,000 employees is guaranteed to have some teams that aren't perfect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
And the second coming of the John Sculley phase of Apple is reaching its late stage.

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.
This time there is no miracle for Apple. However, before that happens, there's a long (and I mean long) road.

Cook for all intent and purposes is a keeper and a good steward, not a dreamer or vision pusher. Hence the lack of "leadership" within teams.
 
I cannot imagine Apple ever getting into telemedicine lol, and “simplified insurance billing” sounds incredibly boring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miles Teg
Sounds like every company I have ever worked for or been involved with and if it wasn’t Apple it wouldn’t even merit a small note in the local paper.
[doublepost=1566322082][/doublepost]
I cannot imagine Apple ever getting into telemedicine lol, and “simplified insurance billing” sounds incredibly boring.
Boring, without a doubt, but it would be incredibly impactful to the healthcare industry if they got adoption. You wouldn’t believe the machinery necessary to handle insurance claims, billing, precertifications, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neutrino23
I think that too much too soon would doom the Watch. A focus on staying healthy makes the most sense as the priority. Going too fast might overwhelm and confuse users and creates the potential for mistakes. You don’t come back from mistakes that end up killing a patient.

I wouldn’t oppose introducing telemedicine at some point but this seems like something Apple should partner with an existing telemedicine company for. I don’t know if I’d want to see an “Apple Doctor”. I don’t see a problem with building in health insurance into the health app, with payable bills going through ApplePay.

Get the basics right, keep adding features steadily. Telemedicine would be a huge endeavour if done all at once.
 
Tim's next subscription service: Apple Health Insurance+

Insurance is void if you remove your Apple Watch for more than 6 hours per day
 
  • Like
Reactions: rillrill
Geez, Apple would be nuts to even position themselves as some sort of medical diagnostic company. Talk about opening a can of potential legal worms.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.