Was that sentence written by an AI ?I have seen the future, and am happy I won't be around to witness it.
“ ‘…all YOU (meaning the writer is not human?) do is MAKE the same crap…’ I‘m not even going to attempt to correct the second sentence. As for the third sentence, what does it even mean? Hugs, ChatGPT”Just watch, AI is going to make better music than your “human art“, because all you do is making the same crap, which is easily replaceable by AI.
Only real artists will survive that are actually unique and not some derivative of other people their work, which will be a very very small minority.
People who worry about AI are people who are not real artists in the first place.
Nope. Written by OI. (organic intelligence)!Was that sentence written by an AI ?
When money is involved and shareholders are seething for more more more more.That Apple sell Logic and Final Cut, widely used engines of human creativity, I really, really, really hoped they'd have had the perspective that human art is sacred.
I thought they could angle toward AI's system integration and offer things such as recognising user behaviour and adapting performance or recommendations, rephrasing and reorganising notes, more intelligent file searching like finding things that match a description (I'm studying and it's so hard finding the schoolwork that matches what I remember that I go online and find a new source every time).
Not for anyone in the creative arts it’s notIn the same frame as Samsung's new AI features...if Apple includes all AI features native to its OS lineup...future is looking bright!
Maybe it's not the same for everyone else and maybe because I had not had to consider it before, but isn't great art of any form impressive because it's enjoyable and that it's created by another human, a being with generally similar limitations to ourselves? AI will have ever increasing compute power. Leveraging that to make art isn't really impressive.Just watch, AI is going to make better music than your “human art“, because all you do is making the same crap, which is easily replaceable by AI.
Only real artists will survive that are actually unique and not some derivative of other people their work, which will be a very very small minority.
People who worry about AI are people who are not real artists in the first place.
My step-daughter is an illustrator. She works on contracts. I don't have the heart to start this conversation with her yet. Her husband is a gig-musician. At least people prefer live music.I think it's cool but the implications of these tools on the creative industry will be devastating once brands and corporations find the feasibility of an AI far cheaper than creative professionals. Especially in the next 5-10 years.
This will certainly go down this road, but there may be backlash by consumers. Don't buy from random company because their marketing, packaging and product were created by AI. Consumers are human and the companies will still need to appeal to humans.I think it's cool but the implications of these tools on the creative industry will be devastating once brands and corporations find the feasibility of an AI far cheaper than creative professionals. Especially in the next 5-10 years.
It will take some jobs. Just think of how many people can do certain tasks/jobs, and then think of when AI can do those tasks/jobs, those people are going to lose their jobs, the ones that use AI won't (I think it's easy to guess that it won't be everyone, so jobs "taken" will be a fact).AI won’t take our jobs. People who know how to use AI will.
If you think a creative professional is just someone that is skilled in using a tool then yes. A creative professional is however much more than that.I think it's cool but the implications of these tools on the creative industry will be devastating once brands and corporations find the feasibility of an AI far cheaper than creative professionals. Especially in the next 5-10 years.
the legitimacy of using someone else's creation w/o their consent for GAN model training has to be addressed in the first place. you must be truly delusional if you think the trained neural network got its "creativity" from thin air just by crunching meaningless numbers. in order to improve this stuff, you'll need data, unimaginable amount of data (and a lot of power. and by lot I mean a really huge amount). guess where does that data come from?I think it's cool but the implications of these tools on the creative industry will be devastating once brands and corporations find the feasibility of an AI far cheaper than creative professionals. Especially in the next 5-10 years.
Good thinking. I’d guess they’ve provided their tools to the publishers because it helps them quickly create unique dynamic artwork for Apple Music. And iteratively improve from their feedback.In my opinion Apple is already experimenting with this on Apple Music. I guess that that's what they use to create animated album art for old albums (like Rumors by Fleetwood Mac). They are quietly experimenting it on a large scale...
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. -Ministry of TruthThe two chief dangers to worldwide society I see in some future iteration of AI/LLM image technology:
- people with sufficient quantities of money (to publish or platform content) no longer needing to hire humans for creating media, impoverishing large swaths of people and continuing the distortion of culture towards the views of those with power
- news being able to be faked at such scale that discerning what is true becomes impossible (to the benefit of maintaining status quo for those with means)
And how does the company know what the AI generated is good? Maybe they could hire creative directors to do so and have a a few other creative people to direct the AI and build a cohesive brand or product. . .I think it's cool but the implications of these tools on the creative industry will be devastating once brands and corporations find the feasibility of an AI far cheaper than creative professionals. Especially in the next 5-10 years.
people just don’t understand how it works or what it’s being used for. It’s not replacing jobs. It’s enhancing people’s ability to do their job and creating more jobs in the industry.People in the comments of this article are having existential worries about AI, while here I am just thinking "wow this is going to lead to some pretty awesome Memojis."![]()
Well, yes - but LSD allows you to actually walk through a stargate (or so I thought). That would indeed be an interesting use of this new tech.That's a use case I'd be interested in.