Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Low-Cost iPhone Design Said to Be Mix of iPhone 5 and iPod Touch with iPod Classic Curves
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not possible. The budget iPhone has to be much more expensive than iPod touch 5th gen, so $ 450 is more likely.
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
This is exactly the reason for the low-priced iPhone rumor. Too many here are U.S.-centric believing that a $0 iPhone 3 is the lowest price possible. But only people like us Americans can be so easily fooled into believing there is such a thing as a "free" phone or a "cheap" phone when we are then signing up for a 2-year fee tail for "service".
The world is different. And with some U.S. carriers looking to move away from the hardware subsidy model, maybe we're finally going to at least consider doing the same. It is almost always the best deal to pay up for the phone and get a cheaper cost of service than buy into the illusion of a "free" phone.
That said though, I still think the spin that a plastic back is going to make much of a difference in cost is silly. Aluminum is not an expensive metal and yes I'm also considering the milling, etc too. A genuine cheap (non-subsidized) iPhone is going to have to make some meaningful cuts to the guts too.
And $299 or $450 is too high for a "cheap" phone. If the goal is to be very competitive on price, Apple needs to be genuinely competitive on price. A premium, cheap phone is not a sensible combination of adjectives. Yes, under $299 means it probably kills the iPod touch. Or maybe this is the next-gen iPod Touch that includes the phone hardware? "But that would kill the iPhone." Cannibalize yourself and make money or let other cannibalize you and take (your) money.
Is any good Android under $299 without a contract? Maybe this will be a product exclusively for emerging markets... like certain high(er) MPG cars priced below near-US-model equivalents and only sold in certain markets where American pricing would never sell?
Last edited:
well a iPhone 5 on contract is already 1€ here
---
a low cost smartphone to me is something like <199€ without a contract and u can buy it at the grocery store including a prepaid card. apple obviously isnt really the typ to do that
This budget iPhone will be better than 4s, only losing the premium feel. People will definitely buy this one over 4s.
It's plain stupid just to have one iPhone for all. Even Bugatti, about as premium brand as it gets, has plans to add a four door sedan to the $2 million dollar Veyron.
Within a year there will be a bigger and budget iPhone to go along with the current type.
Within a year there will be a bigger and budget iPhone to go along with the current type.
I didn't read anything about Retina, can't imagine they use that in that phone.
Are you sure?
There is an iPod for every budget. Such a variety in fact that there is no "Safe Habour" for any other maker of MP3 devices maker.
It is time that Apple did the same for the iPhone. A low cost iPhone is needed in emerging markets like India, China and Brazil. People don't want or need 2 to 3 year contracts to subsidize the phone they purchase.
This is the right move. They really should have done it sooner.
I could actually see this happening this time around. They moved to the Lightning connector and different screen dimensions. A redesign would make sense, since they probably don't want to keep producing two different types of cables. Also keeps developers happy, because of app dimensions and whatnot. Point being: If they put the iPod touch 5 into a phone packaging, it would eliminate the need for the 4S, in turn cutting the slight fragmentation that Apple has going on right now.
If you follow Apple's typical patterns, it wouldn't make any sense at all... But they haven't been following their typical routine, now have they?
If you follow Apple's typical patterns, it wouldn't make any sense at all... But they haven't been following their typical routine, now have they?
Retina display Specs
4-inch (diagonal) widescreen Multi-Touch display
1136-by-640-pixel resolution at 326 ppi
That pixel density is Retina.
No. They are dated designs. The 4 is quite sluggish, even for a 'budget' phone. If Apple bring out two phones a year - the premium and the value line - that's better than just using old models to cover the budget end of things.
Further, the iPhone 4 design is, again, a relatively expensive, finicky thing to make compared to a plastic competitor. Sounds like this rumoured phoned could be a kind of compromise between the best-of-the-best product design Apple is known for and something that's cheaper and easier to churn out in the Chinese sweatshops.
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
Pffff, lower cost iPad or smaller iPad. Keep dreaming.
And then... "Introducing iPad Mini"
And then... "shut up and take my money", "I'm already in line", "best iPad ever", etc
A lower cost iPhone that will run iPhone apps would sell like crazy. There's a huge market that just can't afford the "premium" iPhones as they've been offered (and no free* is not free for this crowd).
Exactly. I'd much rather buy a premium-build 4S or 4 rather than a crappy plastic version for the same price.
iPod touch with 4G
In my view, in 2013 Apple will launch an iPod touch with 3G/4G.
It might well look like this.
The device is not a low cost phone. But a low cost internet connected device.
A voice app may be included. And it would of course support Skype and other VOIP applications.
Price will be about $350 - $399
The strategy has a number of advantages.
1) It will not significantly cannibalize the iPhone and it's premium.
2) It will sell without a contract in channels that other phone makers can't easily touch. In supermarkets and music outlets and electronics stores.
3) To teenagers, gamers, social networking enthusiasts - it will be a perfect device.
4) While Samsung has an advantage in carrier shops, this takes the battle elsewhere.
In my view, in 2013 Apple will launch an iPod touch with 3G/4G.
It might well look like this.
The device is not a low cost phone. But a low cost internet connected device.
A voice app may be included. And it would of course support Skype and other VOIP applications.
Price will be about $350 - $399
The strategy has a number of advantages.
1) It will not significantly cannibalize the iPhone and it's premium.
2) It will sell without a contract in channels that other phone makers can't easily touch. In supermarkets and music outlets and electronics stores.
3) To teenagers, gamers, social networking enthusiasts - it will be a perfect device.
4) While Samsung has an advantage in carrier shops, this takes the battle elsewhere.
Last edited: