Thus why it was posted as a question and not a statement of fact.I’m sure we’ll also hear about Saudi Aramco’s $3 trillion valuation.
There was also the Dutch East India Company, the Mississippi Co. and the South Sea Co. back in the 17th century.
If someone wants to rely on one of these to try to take away from Apple’s accomplishment (if/when it happens) I wouldn’t bother arguing with them. If it’s that important to them to diminish Apple’s success, I’m fine with “The first publically-listed US company to reach a trillion dollar valuation”.
It’s a nice milestone, but a trillion dollars isn’t cool. You know what’s cool? $10 trillion![]()
For me there was some ambuguity in the main article when phrased “arguably”.
But if you want to make assumptions as to intent won’t “bother arguing”.
Thanks to WildCowboy pfor meaningful response.!