It’s been years since the Surface has been relevant, so I doubt that’s it 🤣A touchscreen feels very much like a "we need to copy the Surface" move.
It’s been years since the Surface has been relevant, so I doubt that’s it 🤣A touchscreen feels very much like a "we need to copy the Surface" move.
Neither text readability nor burn-in has been a problem for the tandem OLEDs on the iPad Pros. I would assume that these new OLEDs for the MBP would be at least as good.My bigger concern is text readability over burn-in.
It was the previous design of MBP that prioritized thinness at the expense of functionality and performance. Apple did an about face on the current designs. The rumors now are for a design that keeps most of the functionality but adds a little more lightness to the case. They will be using M6-series processors on a 2nm process node which should give full performance while producing less heat and using less battery.I'm so sick of Apple prioritizing thinness and weight over more performance and battery life. If that's what I wanted, I would go with the MacBook Air. The Pro line can be thicker and heavier than the current generation and most pro users would prioritize performance and battery over physical characteristics.
“does not expect the MacBook Air to adopt the (OLED) technology until 2028 at the earliest.”I wonder what this means for the MacBook Air. Will it finally move to mini-LED or will it be stuck on LCD indefinitely?
“Neural engineering” is not an Apple-specific marketing term. These processors work together in a neural network to do AI processing. Those networks have some of the same characteristics of networks of biological neurons, thus the name.Apple confuses their flock with terms like 'neural engine,' who actually believes that the Apple silicon chips are capable of neural actions?
Neural refers exclusively to the complex, living biological systems of brains and nervous systems, which are composed of organic neurons. These biological systems facilitate genuine consciousness, intuition, and subjective experience, which cannot be replicated entirely in machines today, or ever. Machines or silicon chips (or Siri) will never become biological living systems.
When they create a human-like thinking chip or robot, you might find yourself defending that neural technology, or your Apple device could become akin to a human or human brain. There will never be the same characteristics of a neural network as found in the human brain. Other animals lack the capability for complex thought as humans do.“Neural engineering” is not an Apple-specific marketing term. These processors work together in a neural network to do AI processing. Those networks have some of the same characteristics of networks of biological neurons, thus the name.
No one ever said it was equivalent. I’m sorry if it bugs you but this is an industry term that is used because of how networks of processors interact in ways that are similar to how networks of neurons interact. It makes no claim that this is human-like thinking. You make a distinction for animals and animals also have neurons that interact in broadly similar ways to these chips.When they create a human-like thinking chip or robot, you might find yourself defending that neural technology, or your Apple device could become akin to a human or human brain. There will never be the same characteristics of a neural network as found in the human brain. Other animals lack the capability for complex thought as humans do.
ExactlyI can't stand the Apple trackpads (way too big, needs more space between the edge of the computer and the start of the trackpad), but I also agree a touchscreen is also ridiculous -- just like the Touch Bar was, although that was actually more useful than an entire screen would be. A touchscreen feels very much like a "we need to copy the Surface" move.
“does not expect the MacBook Air to adopt the (OLED) technology until 2028 at the earliest.”
From the second paragraph of the article.
It's possible that Apple will put touch screens on all of their computers, but that's not what you're talking about.Please make the touch screen optional. I definitely (1000%) hate it.
Firstly, the way anybody touching the laptop screen while we already have a trackpad or mouse is stupid. And I hate fingerprints on the display except maybe my iPhone's since it's inevitable.
Yea, I have two Alienware 32" 4K OLED desktop monitors and every four hours of use a message pops up on the display telling me its time to do a pixel refresh to help prevent burn-in. As I use them on my work Desktop computer, its kind of annoying and happens at the most inconvenient times. And its about a 8-10 minute process.One data point does not make a statistic.
OLED screens are well known for burn in, much like Plasma screens, and CRT's before that. LCD was the first real technology that eliminated burn in.
As an iPad Pro user, I say “meh, its not as bad as some people think.”I'll be curious to see how good it looks. I have an M1 MAX 16" MBP and every time I use that laptop I am amazed at how beautiful its display is. 75% of the time I use Lenovo Thinkpads for work. I also have two 32" Alienware OLED 4K monitors connected to a Dell Micro optiplex that I use for work. And I still think the MBP display is better than those OLED screens.
And I second the notion....no touch screen for me. Who wants smudgy fingerprints all over their beautiful display?
I'm torn on your comment, I want to like because I agree with the OLED part, but I also disagree with the touch screen. I don't want a touch screen on my laptop. I'm sure I'll be able to turn it off, but if the UI of MacOS is catering to touch it will effect the usability. I'd rather the mac design stay centered around Keyboard and Mouse/trackpad.I love OLED screens on TVs, but I still have big reservations on computers, mainly cost and burn-in. Apple loves static UI elements, and that menu bar is basically permanent. A beautifully menu bar burned into a £3,000 laptop sounds like a fantastic idea.
As for touchscreens, I have been using touchscreen PCs as work machines for years and, if you get the right hardware, it is genuinely great. I still do not believe Apple has needed to avoid touch for this long. If they actually commit and do it properly, I would absolutely love a touchscreen MacBook.
Problem is I don't like having my dock auto hide. I like it to stay persistent on the screen, so now to cater to the display tech I have to change how I use the computer. I get that OLED has come a long way in the sense that they have gotten good at hiding burn in, but I really don't want to have it in the back of my mind all the time when using a computer. It's just not worth it. I'd rather they stick with the same displays.macOS has had the ability to automatically hide and reveal the menu bar and dock, it has to be activated in system settings. When apps are full screen as well it can auto-hide. Samsung for instance also addresses this by dimming static elements. In 2025 onwards burn-in is not a major concern. Your iPhone has the time, mobile and wifi signal plus battery displaying constantly and I have yet to hear that the OLED screen on iPhones demonstrate a burn-in issue on mass (might be a small number due to defective panels but not mass).
macOS menu bar has also been transparent for a while not and LG also helps in less brighter elements staying active onscreen for too long.
LCD can have dead pixels, that can also be at the back of your mind. Does that mean you won’t use LCD displays as well.Problem is I don't like having my dock auto hide. I like it to stay persistent on the screen, so now to cater to the display tech I have to change how I use the computer. I get that OLED has come a long way in the sense that they have gotten good at hiding burn in, but I really don't want to have it in the back of my mind all the time when using a computer. It's just not worth it. I'd rather they stick with the same displays.
And where are hyped MicroLED?Please make the touch screen optional. I definitely (1000%) hate it.
Firstly, the way anybody touching the laptop screen while we already have a trackpad or mouse is stupid. And I hate fingerprints on the display except maybe my iPhone's since it's inevitable.
Dead pixels are totally different. They generally don't just appear, and if they do it's just a bad display. It isn't something that is caused by the way I use the computer, which is the issue with OLED.LCD can have dead pixels, that can also be at the back of your mind. Does that mean you won’t use LCD displays as well.
CRT had issues too. At the end of the day most people use iPhones or Android devices with OLED for 3-6 years with little issue. Granted there maybe a few number of defective displays with burn-in but it’s no more or less than a LCD either having or developing a dead pixel(s) in the future.
Interesting, I don't think I've gone less than 4 years on any laptop before. I think 5 years was the shortest. My first laptop was a Sony Vaio in 2001. Then late 2006 Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro > early 2013 bought a mid 2012 macbook Pro > M2 Max Macbook Pro Early 2023. I've only had 4 laptops since 2001 and I am guessing I'll keep the M2 Max at least 6 years before I feel the need for an upgrade unless it breaks.Same here. I can't believe its been over 4 years with the M1 pro...I've never gone that long before.
Isn’t the time, battery, wifi and cellular info constantly display with the exception while watching a video in full screen or reading something in full screen mode.Dead pixels are totally different. They generally don't just appear, and if they do it's just a bad display. It isn't something that is caused by the way I use the computer, which is the issue with OLED.
CRT's could have burn in too, yes. But that's why I like LCD's as they improved that concern. I will admit I do have an iPhone 12 Pro that I've had since launch and haven't noticed any issues with it yet, but I also don't just leave it on a static display all the time. When I open apps and things I've noticed a lot that the static elements get inverted somewhat often, which would work to counter the burn in for them. I also don't run the screen at max brightness very often which does accelerate things. So yes, it is possible to use it in a way that minimizes the issue, but it's much easier to do on my phone or TV where static elements are less likely, or the screen isn't on as long vs a computer that I may use all day with a static element sitting in one spot.
CRT had issues too. At the end of the day most people use iPhones or Android devices with OLED for 3-6 years with little issue. Granted there maybe a few number of defective displays with burn-in but it’s no more or less than a LCD either having or developing a dead pixel(s) in the future.
Not really, nowadays. They use their phones to pay for everything. Perhaps not in the US (or Canada), here we hardly use paper money or coins anymore—or write cheques!Consider how people use phones. Check an email here, make a call there. Play a couple mobile games for a bit.
Youngsters do, even in China, maybe everyone in China.Most phones are not left with the display on for 8 or more hours a day.