Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple's U.S. patent activity declined sharply in 2025 amid a broader slowdown in patent filings, according to newly released data from IFI CLAIMS Patent Services.

Apple-Logo-Spotlight.jpg

The data shows that Apple was granted 2,722 U.S. patents in 2025, down from 3,082 in 2024, a year-over-year decline of roughly 12% that pushed the company down two positions to sixth place in IFI's annual ranking of the top 50 recipients of U.S. patent grants. The shift marks a notable change for Apple at a time when its spending on artificial intelligence, silicon design, and software continues to expand, but it also reflects a wider contraction in patent activity across the United States.

Total U.S. patent grants in 2025 fell to 323,272, a decline of less than 1% from the previous year, while U.S. patent applications dropped more steeply, falling 9% to 393,344. IFI noted that the decline in applications represents the lowest level since 2019, following a record high in 2024. The data is compiled directly from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and forms the basis of IFI's annual Top 50 and Top 10 Fastest Growing Technologies reports.

The slowdown was visible across core technology areas that typically account for a large share of U.S. patents, with filings and grants falling in key categories such as digital data processing and data transmission. The slowdown was not limited to Apple, with other major U.S. technology companies such as Google also falling in the patent rankings in 2025, while Nvidia did not receive enough U.S. patent grants to place in the Top 50 despite its central role in the AI boom.

It also came as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office continued to work through a backlog of more than 1.2 million applications, which has delayed the pace at which patents are issued. While U.S.-based companies still received the largest number of patents overall, their total fell by more than 5% in 2025, even as companies in several Asian countries increased their patent counts.

Apple's decline occurred as several competitors either held steady or increased their patent output. Samsung retained the top position for the fourth consecutive year with 7,054 U.S. patent grants, accounting for more than 2% of all patents issued in the United States in 2025. Apple chip supplier Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) ranked second with 4,194 grants, followed by Qualcomm in third place with 3,749.

Apple's drop contrasted with gains by companies such as Dell and Toyota, which moved up eight and six places respectively, driven largely by patents related to computing infrastructure, energy storage, and vehicle systems. Key areas of research in 2025 included AI and battery technologies.

Article Link: Apple's Patent Grants Declined in 2025 as Innovation Slows
 
Innovation? Best we can do is go chase stupid TV shows instead and become a media production company because we have no clue what we're doing at Apple anymore.

You all wanted more Ted Severence or whatever it is, right?
It’s actually Ted Pluribus. If you’re Trump it’s Ted Apple.
 
Treating patent volume as a proxy for innovation is common, but fundamentally misguided. The article even hints at this problem, while still trying to comment on "innovation".

For example, Nvidia is arguably driving the AI revolution, yet it does not even appear in the top 50; this is evidence that market leadership does not require high-volume patent filings. Are market leaders innovators? Not always (and sometimes even rarely), but their actions are driving the market.

Apple’s relatively modest numbers this past year are plausibly explained by a strategic pivot toward trade secrets rather than by any slowdown in R&D (although that's possible). There is little incentive to publish a blueprint (patent) when proprietary control (trade secret) is more valuable. Once the substantial USPTO backlog is factored in, these rankings begin to reflect bureaucratic delay can be a factor.

We also shouldn't assume that quantity of patent applications has to do with quality and innovation. Sometimes companies file all sorts of patents to build a 'wall' of defense or offense to use in lawsuits or to block competitors, rather than to introduce new products. Also, Samsung operates as a massive conglomerate selling thousands of different hardware components, which naturally generates high patent volume. They are creating new things, but quantity shouldn't be linked so closely with "innovation".
 
It’s not innovation but R&D spending. How many patents ever actually make it into end products? They exist so nobody else gets there first. Since the Vision Pro released and Apple simultaneously cancelled the Car project (likely just a cover for real-world Vision Pro sensor suite testing anyway) we don’t seem to have any rumours of them doing anything silly.

The Vision Pro’s main problem is 90% of its functionality can be done with a $499 Quest 3 which also has a better selection of games. Apple are now chasing the future instead of dictating it by playing catch up in glasses and foldables.

What Apple should be doing is recognising that the iPhone was lightning in a bottle. It was built on a century of ideas and communication and nobody, not even Meta or Google will make a product as groundbreaking ever again. Just as the PC settled into the laptop as the idea end form, so has the pocket PC done in the phone. It remains likely that in 100 years time the idea of AR glasses will look like a silly fad and people will still be using smartphones.

There is a reason ideas like the paragon umbrella, house brick and even cutlery have never been improved upon. A folding spoon is still just a spoon. 200 years later and our entire planet still runs on steam.

Apple is now a washing machine manufacturer. It can put in new ideas to existing lines but it cannot rethink the very action of doing the laundry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: onenorth
Wow. Four years behind in reviewing applications. That's a lot.

I've known three patent lawyers. They are all rich. Definite thing to do if you want to do it and enjoy bucks.
 
I think we are reaching the end of real innovation but rather small increments (marketed as such [if we haven’t already]). For me the only thing I’m hoping for a full screen experience (everything under the display). And current usb tech.

I’m sure there will be wireless and even possibly speaker-less. Making a port free phone. But the innovation is finally reaching its apex (beyond battery and chip power and efficiency).
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
I think we are reaching the end of real innovation but rather small increments (marketed as such [if we haven’t already]). For me the only thing I’m hoping for a full screen experience (everything under the display). And current usb tech.

I’m sure there will be wireless and even possibly speaker-less. Making a port free phone. But the innovation is finally reaching its apex (beyond battery and chip power and efficiency).
Removing the port isnt all that innovative because MagSafe and airdrop already exist. The iPhone Air is as close to speakerless as makes sense before usability really suffers; at the very least you still need the earpiece speaker and microphones for calls.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Zenman12
I wonder what kind of thought processes go into making these kinds of misguided articles. I guess it’s just for the clicks. Who says the quantity of patents translate into innovation?
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.