Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
70,287
41,901


The Pro Display XDR is six years old today, making it one of the oldest Apple products still on sale.

Pro-Display-XDR-Black.jpg

Released on December 10, 2019 alongside the redesigned Mac Pro, the Pro Display XDR was Apple's re-entry into the high-end external monitor market, following a three-year hiatus after discontinuing the Thunderbolt Display in 2016. The announcement came at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June 2019, where the company presented the display as a rival to traditional reference monitors. The XDR in its name stands for "Extreme Dynamic Range," a feature that Apple emphasized as a key differentiator from other high-resolution monitors available at the time.

It features a 32-inch Retina display with a 6K resolution of 6,016 by 3,384 pixels, powered by Apple's proprietary LED backlighting system. Apple utilized blue-colored LEDs with custom lenses and reflectors to achieve a maximum brightness of up to 1,600 nits in HDR mode, while sustaining 1,000 nits across the entire screen indefinitely. This allows for what Apple describes as "stunningly accurate colors and contrast," supporting the P3 wide color gamut and delivering a claimed 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio.

The rear of the display features the same lattice pattern used on the 2019 Mac Pro, which functions as a heatsink to aid thermal management. The display is also available with matte nano-texture glass to cut down on glare—the first Apple product it's featured on.

Upon its release, the Pro Display XDR garnered significant attention for its high price. In the United States, the display starts at $4,999, and users who opt for the adjustable Pro Stand must pay an additional $999. The Pro Stand, which is sold separately, was met with mixed reactions upon its unveiling. Apple justified the cost by highlighting the engineering involved, with the Pro Stand offering height, tilt, and rotation adjustments, as well as support for both landscape and portrait modes. A VESA mount adapter is also available for those who prefer third-party mounting solutions.

As of its sixth anniversary, the Pro Display XDR remains one of only two external monitors sold by Apple, alongside the Studio Display, which was released in March 2022. Unlike the Pro Display XDR, the Studio Display comes with an integrated A13 Bionic chip, enabling features such as Center Stage for its built-in webcam, spatial audio, and support for Siri voice commands. The Pro Display XDR, however, has no webcam or any internal Apple silicon chip.

Speculation about a second-generation Pro Display XDR has been circulating for some time. In December 2022, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reported that Apple was working on an updated version of the display, this time with an Apple silicon chip to enhance its capabilities. In July 2023, Gurman reiterated that Apple was still developing multiple new displays. Display supply chain analyst Ross Young added that the next-generation Pro Display XDR will feature quantum dot technology, just like the MacBook Pro.

Evidence of Apple's work on new external monitors has been spotted multiple times. The third beta of macOS 26.1 suggests that the Pro Display XDR 2 will feature a built-in Center Stage camera. The A19 Pro chip is also a possibility, along with a higher refresh rate.

Article Link: Apple's Pro Display XDR Is Six Years Old Today
 
I have an Apple Studio Display and Samsung G80SD (32", 4k, 240Hz) side by side. I run the G80SD at 4k 120Hz via HDMI and prefer it over the ASD.

I'd look forward to a new Pro Display - I'm eyeing an M5 Mac Studio next year and it would pair great, 6k at 32" with 120Hz would be sweet. Though I'd 'settle' for an updated ASD with higher refresh rate.

I feel like Apple has taken forever with updating their Hz, MacOS / iOS / iPadOS are all better at greater than 60Hz, the entire experience is literally twice as smooth at 120Hz. Animations on the G80SD are like butter compared to the ASD, were you see visual chop even when moving windows around.
 
Been my daily driver since released. I know the refresh rate is not so refreshing but good enough for my use. I wish it had inbuilt speakers though.
 
I am by no means wealthy, but I splurged on a Pro Display about 5 years ago. A year later, I got a Studio Display as a secondary monitor.

I absolutely love the Pro Display. So clear, so uniform, just amazing every time I look at it. Because it's so big, you don't need to scroll as much as smaller displays, so the 60Hz limitation(?) is not an annoyance to me.
 
Cool monitor, and looked at buying one, but don't like it's basically proprietary to Apple, and can't take an HDMI input as well as USB-C, for non-computer attachments. I think 32" would have been too big, as well.

I wonder how long people typically keep monitors? I used my Dell 2005FPW for close to 20 years; just retired it earlier this year.
 
Last edited:
My sincere wish is for a 32” 6K 120Hz+ Apple monitor (or even better, the same specs in a new iMac Pro), all hopefully at a slightly lower price. I know, I know, but one can dream.
 
The next version needs to support 5,000+ nits if it wants to be a reference-quality display, as several TVs now support that level of brightness.
 
Cool monitor, and looked at buying one, but don't like it's basically proprietary to Apple, and can't take an HDMI input as well as USB-C, for non-computer attachments.

I wonder how long people typically keep monitors? I used my Dell 2005FPW for close to 20 years; just retired it earlier this year.
A $29 cable and you can connect any device that supports DSC + DisplayPort output to the Pro Display XDR or Studio Display.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
A $29 cable and you can connect any device that supports DSC + DisplayPort output to the Pro Display XDR or Studio Display.

In my case I was referring to a Nintendo Switch, which I don't think would work. We have one connected to my current monitor in our home office.

Wife like to play some during her daily downtime and works from home.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
I have an Apple Studio Display and Samsung G80SD (32", 4k, 240Hz) side by side. I run the G80SD at 4k 120Hz via HDMI and prefer it over the ASD.

I'd look forward to a new Pro Display - I'm eyeing an M5 Mac Studio next year and it would pair great, 6k at 32" with 120Hz would be sweet. Though I'd 'settle' for an updated ASD with higher refresh rate.

I feel like Apple has taken forever with updating their Hz, MacOS / iOS / iPadOS are all better at greater than 60Hz, the entire experience is literally twice as smooth at 120Hz. Animations on the G80SD are like butter compared to the ASD, were you see visual chop even when moving windows around.

Whilst nice it is an OLED so will get burn in if you use static windows all day. Something the Studio Display will not do.
 
Last month I gave up on waiting for a iMac 32" 6K and bought myself a 2025 ASUS 32" 6K display at <16% of the this 6yo Apple 32" 6K display price that starts at $5k without matte screen, VESA, stand or 3Y warranty.

Is it as nice as the 2019 Apple display? No! But my use case isn't that edge so at $1,170 it's well worth it.

Now waiting for a 2026 Mac mini M5 Pro to replace this 2019 MBP 16" Pro Core i7.
 
I feel like Apple has taken forever with updating their Hz, MacOS / iOS / iPadOS are all better at greater than 60Hz, the entire experience is literally twice as smooth at 120Hz. Animations on the G80SD are like butter compared to the ASD, were you see visual chop even when moving windows around.
This is mostly because Apple is obsessed with specific PPIs for their displays to achieve Retina sharpness, so any 27" display they offer will be 5K instead of 4K.

4K at 120Hz without compression is achievable using fairly common connection technologies like Thunderbolt 3/4 or HDMI 2.1. (4K at 240Hz like your monitor can achieve can only do so with DSC).

5K at 120Hz needs more bandwidth than the aforementioned technologies can deliver; Thunderbolt 5 or DisplayPort 2.1 can support them without needing DSC.

There aren't even any OEMs that make 5K panels that do 120Hz outside of 5K2K ultra widescreens, but those aren't full 5K resolution and have fewer pixels to drive and thus lower bandwidth requirements. Apple would need to work with an OEM to develop custom 120Hz panels for their eventual offering which drives up component costs.

Now that Thunderbolt 5 is widely deployed on higher end Macs I suspect higher refresh rates will be in the offering.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BeatCrazy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.