The problem what usually comes with your argument (and all other variations of it) is that we are taking about the people that hold the power to "lead" or hold some amount of influence that is much greater than most other individuals' in the rest of society. Albeit in this situation the action of a certain corporation was laudable, complaints by the rest of us is the main way in which we can voice our desires in a way to actually make them into something of substance.
An an example, this is one of the most significant (if not the most) reason why the Firefox CEO was ousted. Although his personal beliefs does not (in my opinion) impair his skill from an objective sense, that he is a person of influence is why what happened to him happened. To bring that example back to this story, that is why it is perfectly legitimate for individuals to complain about this story, even if it is nothing but positive in your opinion.