Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I expect the CONCEPTUAL idea is that this provides a place where guests (or children) can control the home, in a way that's not feasible if that control is limited to the phone, as people are suggesting.
This is not a TOTALLY crazy idea. My house is heavily homeKit'ed and it would probably benefit guests if they could occasionally change lighting or blinds rather than just accept my automation.
BUT
I suspect this will not live up to its potential, not even close, in the same way as HomePod, but even more so.

1) Will there be a plugin scheme for 3rd party apps? Pretty much the only value I derive from my (free, when AMZ was excited by the things) 1st gen AMZ echo is that it shows me when a delivery is expected today, and when it has arrived. Will I be able to get that on my Apple Echo?
Along the same lines, will notifications of things like cameras appear on this device, so I can see eg who is at the front door, or walking down the driveway. Note this is not hooking into HomeKit Cameras, of course there'll be something for that. This is to hook into all the other infrastructure out there of Nest cameras or Ring Doorbells or whatever.

2) Will this be accompanied by a better framework for home automation?
HomeKit was garbage for a few years because of reliability. They have done well in the past two years or so to fix the reliability issues, but everything related to automation is still amateur hour. Writing Scenes is still pathetically inefficient, there is no way to perform obvious tasks everyone requires (eg equivalent of if/then/else, or automating by date, or grouping Scenes together for easy reuse, or replacing an existing item [eg lightbulb] with a new item that has the same role, etc etc etc).

All this stuff matters because the one group that actually derive value from this sort of product are builders and home remodellers. But they cannot fit this stuff into a house when Apple's entire model for HomeKit is amateur hour, with zero consideration for the needs of professional developers.

Look at it that way:

. Use Home and its iOS integration for the GUI part (with homebridge you can bring any device you like to HomeKit)

. Use Homeassistant for automations and logic

This is what I do and it works well for the rest of the family.
I am looking forward for this new Apple device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdbrown75 and erihp
I have an old iPad and I have an iPad stand for it already….
have a wall mounted iPad Pro - but it is not optimal.
A dedicated device (presence sensor + home focussed screen layout) could significantly improve the experience.
 
I think home automation in general has never really been “average consumer-ready”. Multiple control and connectivity standards mean buying components is a bit of a mine field for average consumers who want it to “just work”.

Some are like me, who treat home automation almost like a hobby, just something to dive into once in a while. We don’t mind having to tinker with it and use something like Home Assistant as the core of it all. But this also means that those like me who might actually be interested in home automation have already made an investment in hardware so having to replace devices simply because Apple (or anyone else) now only supports whatever the latest standard happens to be is kind of a non-starter. So we string together software-based integrations to keep it all together and move forward, but this approach is not really sustainable or appropriate for mass market consumers.
fully right - but you need an interface for the rest of the family and this is where HomeKit shines ...
 
About POE - Apple will never do it. But if it is dockable there is a serious chance of a third party mount, that does it
 
fully right - but you need an interface for the rest of the family and this is where HomeKit shines ...
I honestly never had much luck sharing control of Home. When I first tried (admittedly a few years ago) it seemed like everyone had to be part of Family Sharing. Now it seems it requires a hub, consisting of either an AppleTV 4K or HomePod, neither of which I own or have any use for. I gave up on HomeKit as it was easy enough to create some simple control screens with HomeAssistant and let folks in my house access it via browser or HomeAssistant app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joecomo
I honestly never had much luck sharing control of Home. When I first tried (admittedly a few years ago) it seemed like everyone had to be part of Family Sharing. Now it seems it requires a hub, consisting of either an AppleTV 4K or HomePod, neither of which I own or have any use for. I gave up on HomeKit as it was easy enough to create some simple control screens with HomeAssistant and let folks in my house access it via browser or HomeAssistant app.
it was quite buggy in its early days - works quite nicely now
 
But does it, in fact, require an AppleTV 4k or HomePod as a hub to share access? I know at one time an iPad cou”d be used for that but I see no mention of that now.
you need a home hub to get the most out of homekit. MacOS nor iPad can act as a hub. It does not need to be a 4k ATV, any gen 4 and newer will work.

HA and homekit integrate such that you could expose homeassistant to homekit, then share the HomeKit home with whoever you want in the Apple ecosystem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
But does it, in fact, require an AppleTV 4k or HomePod as a hub to share access? I know at one time an iPad cou”d be used for that but I see no mention of that now.
iPad was suppressed a while ago - so yes, you‘ll need one of those
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
you need a home hub to get the most out of homekit. MacOS nor iPad can act as a hub. It does not need to be a 4k ATV, any gen 4 and newer will work.

HA and homekit integrate such that you could expose homeassistant to homekit, then share the HomeKit home with whoever you want in the Apple ecosystem.
But I can already share access with anyone I want at home through HA. In my case, at least, exposing HA to HomeKit is just duplication of effort and sharing Apple Home would require an additional Apple hub device. I’m sure HomeKit is fine for anyone who already has the required device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joecomo
But I can already share access with anyone I want at home through HA. In my case, at least, exposing HA to HomeKit is just duplication of effort and sharing Apple Home would require an additional Apple hub device. I’m sure HomeKit is fine for anyone who already has the required device.
its more about integration with apple products. with a home hub, the user who has the home shared with th can use native apple apps and features to execute smart home commands. like the home app and siri.

If you had a Homekit hub, they would be added via Home, and they could use the home app. They would never need to be added to HA, and you would not ever need to expose HA over WAN/VPN.


It really is the best if both worlds. both work concurrently, so you could use HA and other users (even visitors) could be added and removed via home, and actually be able to use the home without a training course on HA.

A used apple TV 4th gen are dirt cheap. But If a homepod mini provides more tangible features for a smart home. Both also support utilizing icloud for Homekit secure video.
 
But I can already share access with anyone I want at home through HA. In my case, at least, exposing HA to HomeKit is just duplication of effort and sharing Apple Home would require an additional Apple hub device. I’m sure HomeKit is fine for anyone who already has the required device.
yes you can - in my experience however HomeKit has a much better family acceptance (we are all on iOS).
I use HA myself - but HomeKit for the other family members.

You can use the HomeKit plugin feature in HA to expose everything to HomeKit - but I prefer to connect directly
(which indeed creates some double configuration effort).
 
  • Like
Reactions: erihp
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.