Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The G4 iMac was when it shipped, and remains, one of the best pieces of ergonomic industrial design in history, and it is deeply disappointing that no one has brought something like that back.

What it did that nothing today other than an expensive desk-mount arm (which very few average users even know exists as a product) does was let you immediately reposition the screen in three dimensions.

I vividly remember watching my mom use hers, and not only was it great for personal ergonomics—she would regularly move it to track her sitting position, in far more ways than just tilting a screen up and down allows—but if someone else was looking at the screen with her it allowed her to swing the screen over to share, no matter where they were sitting or standing. It felt effortlessly friendly, personal, and fun.

No idea whether this product will work, or be something I want, but I’d sure be happy to see the form factor resurrected.
 
Currently, I can’t see the use for this. Siri still needs a lot of work and HomeKit is a mess. Apple also needs to work with home automation makers to integrate things a lot easier than it is now, and products need to be available worldwide.

I can’t see people buying this just for a screen. What Apple could do is make a mesh network, along with HomePods, to replace the long-abandoned Airport. Apple should also make HomePod minis work as surround sound speakers.
 
I guess this works as a Homekit Hub and can run Apple Intelligence. Quite an interesting product in my opinion.
 
OK, long story but my point is that "small phone size" is about right for this and I want it INSIDE the wall. not on a table. and "about $70" is the right price. Also, I absolutely do not want cords of any kind, nor do I ever want to replace a battery, So wall-mounted and connected directly to AC mains is best. Just like a conventional light switch.

I don't think Apple will ever be able to sell anything like this. They will be stuck selling what I call an "iPad on a stick"

I like your post- many great points.

You lose Apple at “about $70” because you probably base that on being price competitive with a company NOT chasing 50% margin. So Apple can make it… but add about 30-40% to competitive prices for similar. Shareholder ROI > consumer value.

And that’s likely the main obstacle to HomeKit success too. Pick any HomeKit product. Check price. Find the same product sans HomeKit. Look at that discount. For the crowd who doesn’t worship at an alter to them, the relative prices are just too high…. but oh so profitable for the fraction that will “just pay” anything they ask.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I think the right product would be a homekit hub with a place to set your ipad down for charging using the "Smart Connector" to provide the UI either when docked or not.

In reality, the base should also be functional as a wireless access point(and provide 2-4 RJ45 ports for upstream or downstream and a separate backbone WiFi channel).

Making a unique product only for homekit hub interaction is so old school to be laughable to be coming from the "innovator" Apple.
This is a pretty good idea. I might even consider buying such a device.
 
I hope automated home stuff takes off enough that this is useful but right now are fine with apple tv and phone
 
If it combined both Apple TV and HomePod functionality, I could see why some customers might want one. But I already have both an Apple TV and HomePod Mini, so I don't see any usage for me.
 
This is exactly what I’ve always been wanting with HomePods. I used to be in the Google home ecosystem and I still miss the screen ones with the photo frame screensaver to this day. I’ve never gotten the point of the idea of it being a tablet that you can remove from the room, the entire point of these devices is they never move so everyone in the house always has access to them. It would be like carrying your living room TV or light switches from room to room.

I think the only way iPad docking for this purpose would ever speak to me is if the “dock” could work as an audio only HomePod when the iPad was detached, then I would use one of those exclusively for my bedroom as a charging dock and get the stationary ones for other rooms. For some reason I don’t grasp, Google didn’t do this with their attempt at this idea even though they went on to sell extra docks separately and the fact that they‘re willing to sell much cheaper and lower quality speakers at the entry level.
 
Sorry - but it seems like thats not the case for normal use @ home...
In my country, more than 50% of the households and businesses is connected to FTTH.

https://www.swisscom.ch/en/about/network/fibre-optics-network-expansion-map.html

The current router in our household is:


Additionally, we have the necessary components to construct a Wi-Fi 6E mesh network.

 
Still got my G4! Looks and works great, too!
I like that you have that as your computer in your signature. :)

I still have mine too.

MacMuseum.jpg


However, as mentioned, I would be surprised if this new iPad-HomeHub thingy has an articulating arm, or any arm at all. I think it would more likely be just a tilted screen attached directly to a hemispheric base.
 
This thing has to be priced cheaper than an iPad, since an iPad could also double as home hub.

Edit: I didn't realise the new Home Hub architecture does not support the iPad anymore. Feel a bit devastated knowing it, really

But why would it *need* to be less expensive than an iPad? If your only use case is a home hub, the much cheaper AppleTV is right there. If you want it for a unique use cases (like a kitchen appliance) it should be better than an iPad.

Yes, it will be as successful as Apple Vision pro - while great on paper, lack of real world usage will just kill it with time. lol

This makes me think you aren’t following the VisionPro. Personally, I’d love to own that “killed with time” business. Not everything needs or is even intended to sell as many as the iPhone. That doesn’t make it a failure.

Here’s a solid use case for it:

This supposed product does not interest me at all. Wouldn't you rather have an iPad instead?

I don’t know that this product will be worth it to me, but as a person that regularly cooks with the help of his HomePod (conversions, timers, music) and an iPad (static or video cooking ideas/instructions, entertainment), I find the iPad to not be ideal in the kitchen. Certainly better than a desktop or laptop computer, but plenty of room for improvement.

(while iOS is great - their HomePods, TVs are just not catching up... i do not even mention the "AI")

HomePods and AppleTV aren’t “catching up”? They are still top dog in my use cases. Perhaps you meant that you personally as an individual would like additional features that another product offers (which ones?), and accidentally made a blanket statement?

I chuckle every time I see the critics’ “lack of imagination” thrown around.

Requires imagination to see a use for it = no practical commercial use case

Simple as that.

While the first statement is hyperbolic, so is your response statement. Personal computing is famously hard to predict what new and exciting use case will appear, that the creator didn’t see coming. Take the link above about surgeons using the VisionPro. Maybe Apple saw that one coming, but I don’t think any of us did.

Plenty of products became famous for a use case their creator didn’t anticipate, which requires imagination on the part of the user to use the product in a novel and unintended way.
 
In my country, more than 50% of the households and businesses is connected to FTTH.

https://www.swisscom.ch/en/about/network/fibre-optics-network-expansion-map.html

The current router in our household is:


Additionally, we have the necessary components to construct a Wi-Fi 6E mesh network.

I still dont think, that the mayority of the people has 10GB at Home. No way. Nicht mal in der Schweiz...
 
I chuckle every time I see the critics’ “lack of imagination” thrown around.

Requires imagination to see a use for it = no practical commercial use case

Simple as that.

Agreed -- it's literally the opposite of a smash product idea if one has to use their imagination to figure out what to use it for
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
This concept seems like it should be a dock for an iPad that magnetically attaches (quick grab & go) and goes into a specially designed docked mode when attached
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
The first Mac that I remember seeing in person as an adult. College bookstore. Blew me away. Ended up getting a PowerBook 12”. have an iMac g4 in my living room today. As a middle age man longing for the good ol days, I miss those hardware designs and the aqua interface.
Sounds just like me when I first got introduced to the Macintosh in 1988 as a college freshman.
 
However, as mentioned, I would be surprised if this new iPad-HomeHub thingy has an articulating arm, or any arm at all. I think it would more likely be just a tilted screen attached directly to a hemispheric base.

I feel the same - no arm.

There might be be a small range of forward/back tilt - that wouldn't be difficult or costly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EugW
I think I would have a use for this sort of thing, if it actually "is a thing" that is..

Could be perfect to buy and put at my aging relatives place as a "family facetime communicator"

As it is now with their iPads, they always struggle to hold them in a way where we can see them easily and/or isn't shaking the whole time -- the experience mostly sucks

Something like this could be perfect for that
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.