You can feel the desperation spreading through the Apple HQ. There is no next iPhone somewhere on the horizon. Build a newer and better vaccum robot? The „iSuckit“? I don‘t know, Apple a $5k cleaning robot will be another niche market. And you won‘t beat boston dynamics or Nvidia, for sure.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Work on Robots: What We Know So Far
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Honestly I feel that anyone with real engineering experience in the auto-manufacturing industry - who wasn't being paid by Apple to think otherwise - already knew that the car project was dead in the water before it ever set sail. It was so unlikely that they could ever successfully conceive, design and manufacture a working and commercially viable automobile, that one can't help believe it was either always a PR exercise or that upper management have been hopelessly lost at sea since 2011.
They'd never lower the total price; they'd just increase the base price by $8k
I already have a HomePod in each room so basically it’s useless to me. Unless it actually does something other then be a smart speaker.
I want a robot:
1. That can Clean
2. For Sex. - must have DeepFake capabilities.
3. Can Cook
4. Does not require a prenup
5. Comes with a Ball Gag
6. Must have a holder for iPad at face and tramp stamp position.
7. ALSO, when I say "Doggy". I don't want Siri to come back with Kentucky fried Chicken is 4 blocks to your west, here is the map, OR Doggy is not in your music play list, meaning, Siri actually works.
1. That can Clean
2. For Sex. - must have DeepFake capabilities.
3. Can Cook
4. Does not require a prenup
5. Comes with a Ball Gag
6. Must have a holder for iPad at face and tramp stamp position.
7. ALSO, when I say "Doggy". I don't want Siri to come back with Kentucky fried Chicken is 4 blocks to your west, here is the map, OR Doggy is not in your music play list, meaning, Siri actually works.
I had two (older cheaper) Eufy as well which I found as just adequate. On the other hand the J9 is shockingly good. The suction/cleaning power is superior and it takes pictures of obstacles and goes around them. I also like the J9 emptying itself after every job. Really a very nice machine. I spend all sorts of nonsense money on silly things but put the J9 in the ‘most useful/delightful’ category like my iPad.
Preaching to the choir. I have no idea why Apple even considered it. Or why they spent $10 Billion before admitting defeat. As a shareholder, that could have gone to a special dividend, or stock buybacks, if they couldn't think of something better, like robotics, say. Or CarPlay integration with existing automakers' operating systems. Imagine being able to just say, "Siri, start my BMW, open all windows and skylight, start the engine, turn on the A/C, and plan a route to Popeye's." All from the comfort of your armchair!
It’s going to be another canceled project after they spend millions just watch
Possibly this is being look at in the wrong way. A lot of robotics is geared towards improved manufacturing processes, not advanced home automation products.
Remember this article where most people looked at the tile of the article not at what manner of technology Apple was buying?
Apple Buys DarwinAI Ahead of Major Generative AI Updates Coming in iOS 18
Apple acquired Canada-based company DarwinAI earlier this year to build out its AI team, reports Bloomberg. DarwinAI created AI technology for...
www.macrumors.com
Robotics could certainly be used in conjunction IMHO.
Where are people getting the vacuum idea from? The article does NOT say that Apple is working on a vacuum, but a huge percent of the comments are "Apple is building a vacuum. Ha Ha! Stupid Apple thinking they can build a better vacuum!"
Is there some other outlet that claims Apple has its eye on the robot vacuum market?
Yes. They first thing they could do is an iPhone usable by stroke victims or people with limited abilities. Perhaps a giant Apple watch that could be limited to just a few clear functions that always work the same way.
It is because vacuums are the only home robots that are actually useful right now - anything else seems far on the horizon as far as feasibility.
It's certainly time for another advancement in home robots. Vacuum robots have been around for a quarter century.
Neither of the robots that ARE mentioned in the article excite me at all. At least not as described. Why do I want a screen following me around, when I have a screen in my pocket most of the time? Why do I want a screen on a table that looks around an mimics a head not?
What I think these two robots are is telepresence robots.
One model stays in one place. It could be a seat at a conference table, and the screen displays the persona of someone "dialing in" from a Vision headset. The person in the headset sees the other people who are at the table and the room itself. If there are multiple people dialing in from headsets, they would see spatial personas in place of the other robots.
The model that can roll around the room would be for people who need mobility. A manager could use it to inspect a production line. They could move along the line and look at whatever needed looking at. They could stop and talk to employees on the line, or to other telepresence robots (which they'd see as spatial personas of the person operating them). There's a lot more to this scenario, but it's just my imagination, and not based on any inside information at Apple.
The people who think Apple is developing a vacuum aren't using their imaginations at all.
This really was the tiniest, faintest whisper of a rumor and it supurred and entire unfounded article - not bad.
True, except he doesn't actually care about any shareholders. He only cares about his own stash. Scrooge McCook.