Has Apple adjusted to only taking 30%? Last I heard it was 49%, and besides, I'm sure the government takes their chunk of what is left.
It's always been 30% for in-app purchases. Recently for subscriptions it drops to 15% after the first year.
Has Apple adjusted to only taking 30%? Last I heard it was 49%, and besides, I'm sure the government takes their chunk of what is left.
Last you heard? Check Apple's developer policy which has been available online since before the App Store launched. It's still 30%, just like it always has been. And yes, the government does take their chunk. It's called taxes, which has also been a thing since pretty much the beginning of the world. None of these facts should be "mind boggling" at this point.Has Apple adjusted to only taking 30%? Last I heard it was 49%, and besides, I'm sure the government takes their chunk of what is left.
The Flat Earth.In what world is 30% half?
It has been 30% since day one. And since when are taxes Apple's fault?Has Apple adjusted to only taking 30%? Last I heard it was 49%, and besides, I'm sure the government takes their chunk of what is left.
When was the last time you looked at the Microsoft Build conference? $2395.00 this year, for three days.Of course Apple charges $1,600 for a conference ticket.... and of course Apple consumers willingly pay that kind of money.
Insane.
I still find it mind boggling that Apple charges so much for a dev to go to WWDC where they are taught how to make better apps, of which Apple takes half the revenue.
All you need for that is an emoji-related article here, and that's free.1600 bucks is a lot of money to see a chimp’s brain explode...
Of course Apple charges $1,600 for a conference ticket.... and of course Apple consumers willingly pay that kind of money.
£1200 (or 1199) was how much my card was chargedAs much as Tim Cook is greedy scum personified, £1600 is a bargain for the networking alone. Unfortunately it also all but puts free app developers out of the loop, as they are not likely to qualify for the scholarship*.
*Apple already signalling they no longer want free devs in their ecosystem so this won’t ever change.
£1200 (or 1199) was how much my card was charged
As has been pointed out, it’s 30% then 15% for subscriptions after a year. And 70% of something is better than 100% of nothing. In the “old days” of shrink-wrapped software, you’d be lucky to get 40% from a distributor.I still find it mind boggling that Apple charges so much for a dev to go to WWDC where they are taught how to make better apps, of which Apple takes half the revenue.
You mean like pretty much every IT related conference? Microsoft Ignite, VMworld, Pure Accelerate, Dell Technologies World. Some of these are far more expensive.Of course Apple charges $1,600 for a conference ticket.... and of course Apple consumers willingly pay that kind of money.
Insane.
Reading the thread where all that has been addressed a number of times can be of assistance.lol - Only in America can one be put in a "lottery" to have the chance at giving Apple $1500.
SMH.......
CheersEven better value in old money! Hope you get your money's worth (and then some).
Yeah, that's awesome. You can actually go on a real training course for that kind of money -- you know, with a trainer and a small class, and absolutely no "lottery" involved.
1600 bucks is a lot of money for going on a pilgrimage to meet Apple staff. Even the Vatican in Rome doesn't charge that entrance fee.
Based on some posts it seems like something like that would indeed be the case.Whoever is not interested simply doesn't have to apply instead of complaining about the cost. Attending is not a necessity. Would you walk in a Ferrari dealership and complain Toyota costs so much less?