Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AppleWatch limitations on WIFI
- Thread starter jwolf6589
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Is this post from the future????? 5G is currently testing in a few select markets but there is no (Apple) consumer devices that have 5G radios.
He’s asking about 5GHz WiFi versus 2.4GHz WiFi, but got the terminology confused with mobile cellular networking standards.
.
I see now but 5G and 5GHz are of course not interchangeable terms. As for 5GHz it has been discussed many times. Since it is a higher frequency it would have a shorter wave length (not longer or bigger [again the wrong term]), so it would use the same antenna.
Last edited:
From what I understand, 5GHz radios consume a significant amount of energy and does not travel as far. Awhile back I had to enable the 2.4GHz radio on my router to connect my thermostat, security cameras, kindle, harmony remote etc to my network.
The same applies to other smart watches like the Gear S3 though it allows you to see networks independently from the phone and input the password directly on the watch. Wish WatchOS would adopt that.
The same applies to other smart watches like the Gear S3 though it allows you to see networks independently from the phone and input the password directly on the watch. Wish WatchOS would adopt that.
Correct and 5GHz also doesn't travel through walls very well.
Its also slower. But then again on the watch FaceTime audio calling would probably use the most bandwidth of anything you would do.
You need to read the op more closely. WIFI and cellular are not compatible. I was referring to 5ghz but I appreciated and said 5G.
The watch does not have a 5 GHz Wi-Fi chip so it can't connect to a 5 GHz Wi-Fi connection. A couple of factors are likely: Apple chose to use an older, lower power, and cheaper 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi chip.
Dave
The 5Ghz access point on my X is considerably faster than the 2.4Ghz access point.