I dont know what vB allows, but it would be nice if a user, specifically the thread starter, would be able to get "Mod Power" by a mod for a specific thread. Thoughts?
I dont know what vB allows, but it would be nice if a user, specifically the thread starter, would be able to get "Mod Power" by a mod for a specific thread. Thoughts?
well idk about automaticly geting power for the thread you start, but if the situation allows, it might be nice.newbies modding threads? me modding threads? no, awful...disaster...
well idk about automaticly geting power for the thread you start, but if the situation allows, it might be nice.
Like in t0mat0's Snow leopard thread, or Tallest's Gainstown Mac Pro thread, might be examples of when it might(or have) be nice.
i think if the mods see if the OP is credible, and might be nice in the situation, they could appoint. A big thing would be the power to CLOSE the thread.good idea, maybe if the OP is credible (over 1000 posts?) and the thread goes above 50 replies/100 replies??
though i guess post count doesnt really indicate maturity so thats not a really good thing to base it on.
i think if the mods see if the OP is credible, and might be nice in the situation, they could appoint. A big thing would be the power to CLOSE the thread.
In theory, it's a good idea. But in practice, I doubt it would work. Mods are appointed for their decision making skills and their ability remain calm in any situation. Not everyone can be a mod, and letting anyone who starts their own thread be a mod for their own thread wouldn't work out.
like i said, it wouldn't be automatic, im sure the only way it would work would be to have the users be appointed case by case.In theory, it's a good idea. But in practice, I doubt it would work. Mods are appointed for their decision making skills and their ability remain calm in any situation. Not everyone can be a mod, and letting anyone who starts their own thread be a mod for their own thread wouldn't work out.
like i said, it wouldn't be automatic, im sure the only way it would work would be to have the users be appointed case by case.
like i said, it wouldn't be automatic, im sure the only way it would work would be to have the users be appointed case by case.
well it wouldn't happen often so i doubt they would spend most of the time choosing temp mods.that could create a lot more work for the "real" mods, but it would have its ups once the mod for the thread has been chosen (Y)
well it wouldn't happen often so i doubt they would spend most of the time choosing temp mods.
Is there a reason why this is needed?The mods have been doing a fantastic job as far as I can tell, why fix what ain't broke?
they are upgrading Leopard aren't theyi guess it would be more of a modification then fixing it.
I never said "Don't fix what needs desperately fixing."![]()
Maybe as an alternate... the thread starter is given more buttons for things such as requesting the thread be closed. So the functions they require can be there but a notification request is sent to the mods to actually perform the function?
That feature is on every post in the shape of the report post button.![]()