Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Personally... I would have a hard time justifying the 5K I just plunked down if it wasn't a tool that helped me make money. But thats just me...

Bottom line, if you have the funds, get what you want... there doesn't have to be a good reason... you just might "want" it. :apple:
 
Excellent question. Thanks for posting it. Not all of us are misinterpreting your question or tone. You're just curious, and there's nothing wrong with that.

I'm not sure what you mean by "pro". I am a "professional", I guess. That is, I use my computer for business purposes. But, I don't think that's what you're after. I think you're wondering how many of us are "pros" in the sense that we're the pros the machine was built for (graphic designers, music engineers, film makers, animators, etc.). I am not that kind of pro. I do some graphic design, photography and video editing, but nothing major. Certainly nothing that requires a Mac Pro.

I went with a Mac Pro, primarily, because I came from a Windows mentality of "buy the biggest, baddest machine you can possibly afford, and maybe it won't be a dog within 6 months".

Another reason I went with a Pro, instead of an iMac (my only other consideration) was because of the monitor. I didn't want to waste the 24" monitor I already had (no desire for a dual monitor setup), and I had a hard time with the idea of basically just throwing away a beautiful iMac 24" monitor when it was time to replace the computer.

Future proofing had a little bit to do with it too.

Truth be told, I'm not sure I made the right decision. Having spent $4000 on this machine, I could have purchased two 24" iMacs for the same price, and my wife could be on the good side of the force now too. Or I could have went with a 24" iMac and a descent MacBook for the same price.

Only time will tell if I made the right choice or not. If this ends up lasting 2 years longer than an iMac would have, then I will feel good about the choice, and go this route again next time. If not, I'll probably switch it up to the iMac. When I say "lasting 2 years longer", I'm speaking not only of failure issues, but of continuing to be a great performer on modern software, as well as my ability to control my emotional drive to buy every new thing that comes out.

So I guess I should throw this question out to the forum: Currently, is a 5 year old Mac Pro better equipped to handle Leopard and CS3 Suite than a 5 year old iMac is?
 
No, being a pro is not required, but its a lot of power gone to waste for mere websufing, that's for sure.

I need mine because I'm a pro photographer and videographer, and having the ability to dual boot my system is a must (FCP Studio and Aperature on Leopard, Adobe Production Studio and Office on WinXP). I know most of you are thinking, why not just run all the applications on Leopard only? I've already invested a significant amount of money in software for my former PC and the speed and ease of use gained is just not worth it yet.

Plus I won't completely get rid of windows because as a businessman some compatibilty issues still exist even in this post-Intel conversion, Office for Mac 2008 world. :apple:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.