Are the fingerprints as bad as pictures make it seem?

Discussion in 'iPod touch' started by docprego, Sep 20, 2007.

  1. docprego macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Location:
    Henderson, NV
    #1
    Every photo I see of the Touch has horrendous fingerprints all over it. In contrast I never see this in iPhone photos. Is the Touch a fingerprint magnet?
     
  2. ivi7 macrumors 6502a

    ivi7

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    #2
    Not really a simple wipe with anything removes them.
    Its better than my last pda.
     
  3. siurpeeman macrumors 603

    siurpeeman

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Location:
    the OC
    #3
    the front shouldn't be any worse than the iphone, but the back is the shiny chrome, which attracts prints and scratches. however, if you use the ipod a lot, you'll stop noticing after a while.
     
  4. RadioStar macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2007
    #4
    I can only tell when the screen is off.

    When it's on, I can't see any smudges.
     
  5. docprego thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Location:
    Henderson, NV
    #5
    It is the front I am referring to. I know the back is the ridiculous shiny chrome that has no business being on a device that will be handled alot. My concern is the front surface your fingers will always be deliberately touching. I read that the iPhone resists fingerprints very well, but the photos of the touch look really bad in that department.
     
  6. squeeks macrumors 68040

    squeeks

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Location:
    Florida
    #6
    they have a different coating on the front of the screen, but they are still hardly noticeable when the thing is on, its when its of and you look at it the right way you see all of the fingerprints

    i just wish they had made the back brushed aluminum like the iphone
     

Share This Page