I say that because while I agree with Decimotox's statement, we have to ask how much.
It's a matter of opinion. Frankly I think TouchID alone makes it significantly better.
I agree. My point was that, in general, if you tell someone that something is better than something else, most people assume that it's MUCH better.It's a matter of opinion. Frankly I think TouchID alone makes it significantly better.
Every new model is better than the previous model,'s' or no 's'.
We all know what happens when we assume.I think we can assume that nobody's questioning if an iPhone 5 is better iPhone 3GS/4S...
I agree. My point was that, in general, if you tell someone that something is better than something else, most people assume that it's MUCH better.
Really?What?
That's an incredibly strange viewpoint to hold.
We all know what happens when we assume.
That's basically it. An S version would be better than the same version without an S (the previous version), and then the next version without an S would be better than that previous version with an S.Every new model is better than the previous model,'s' or no 's'.
Exactly.I dont get the point of this question. Are "S" models better than their parent non-S model? Yeah, by the virtue that the S models are born a year later. Now, if the comparison was with the next year's non-S model; then no - again by virtue of being one year behind...
There isn't as much of a leap from a 4 to a 4S, as there is from a 4S to a 5. Each year the new iPhone is better than the one it replaced, so the question is a bit strange. Of course it is better.