Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's a fine machine — however, it's not an iMac competitor for several reasons.

The most obvious of which is that it has decided to incorporate a touch UI. One could argue that tablet-esque manipulation is the wave of the future, but as it stands now, it simply serves as a hinderance to the OS. The UI is completely un-refined. It doesn't play nice, at times, with the system itself. And professional level programs have not migrated to a multi touch interface (as of yet).

Another problem is the software. Argue what you want about specifications, there's no denying that OSX and high-mark Linux distributions are far more stable than Windows. Sure, I could load Ubuntu onto this machine and be happy, but when I needed a professional level program, I might back myself into a corner.

Stemming from that point is the issue of the (currently) fragmented Windows ecosystem. That might not mean much to certain professionals, but for me, it's what puts Apple far and away above the competition. The apps. The quality of builds software companies effort toward Mac vs PC. The integration with media technology. Yeah, I could Hackintosh this machine, but if we're being honest, it's a pain to maintain/troubleshoot a high functioning hackintosh.

Lastly, Apple's are expensive up-front. But 2-3 years down the road when I'm ready to upgrade, I'll offload my iMac for 60% of what I paid for it. While this Asus machine will likely be around 20%. Once you invest into the Apple product line, your out of pocket cash for an upgrade is comparable to the PC market. They hold their value.
 
How much do these things cost? Spec-wise, the iMac seems considerably better. From some leaked pricing I found on the internet, they won't be any cheaper than the iMac.
 
1) Windows 8... Try it, for anyone that hasn't, honestly go and have a go, it's like someone at Microsoft thought, hmmm, Windows ME, that was good, now lets make it slightly more counter intuitive!
2) Look at it, it's so ugly!
3) The spec is awful
4) It runs windows 8 (Its so bad I had to mention it twice!)

If I wasn't going iMac and wanted a Windoze machine, I would save my money and get a tower that I could hide out of the way and a nice quality monitor, meaning I could upgrade the tower or even replace it, without having to endure an overpriced mediocre spec'd ugly ass Asus sat on my desk!
 
Here's the real question: why would you even buy a Windows all-in-one.


You destroy the 1 big advantage Windows machines generally have: more powerful hardware for the $$$.

No, touch doesnt count. You can buy pretty cheap/decent looking stand alone touch monitors now.
 
Asus products are fine for those who are looking for a budget-friendly brand.

Apple is not really a budget-friendly brand, and yes often "over priced" but we by anyway 'cause we like the brand.

So far there has been no official pricing on these machines. I doubt they would be any cheaper than the iMac.
 
I ***** my pants...

Are you disappointed with the new iMac, this might be an option.
http://www.asus.com/News/FI4KyZO2YC6YTCGP/

Man, this must be one of the good ones... It looks like they took an iMac G4 and flatened it with a truck... Gee, if we make the display go left and right without moving the whole bastard, we'll be copying... So let's just make it go really low to give you an idea of how low our bass can go on this magnificent piece of... engineering let's say! It comes with a bonus squeegie so you can remove all the fingerprints you'll have on the screen from your burrito eating family playing angry birds. I gotta stop here or i'll go on all day.
Please dude... Do yourself a favour. Go play with your windblows 8 copy and leave the adults do their business, ok? That's a good boy!
 
At least, this machine doesn't stuff everything in such a needlessly tight thermal envelope like the iMac does. On the other hand, multi-touch on a vertically stood display is not ideal either. Still, I wouldn't knock a non-iMac AIO because it isn't made by Apple or doesn't run OS X.
 
At least, this machine doesn't stuff everything in such a needlessly tight thermal envelope like the iMac does. On the other hand, multi-touch on a vertically stood display is not ideal either. Still, I wouldn't knock a non-iMac AIO because it isn't made by Apple or doesn't run OS X.

Well, at least Apple's AIOs don't burst up in flames, no matter their thermal envelope ;)
 
At least there's that. Though they do come close.

Why, do other AIO do that?

You don't really follow the AIO market, do you? Just google for Lenovo AIO recall.

Point is, the iMac has been the best AIO on the market for a number of years now. There is simply nothing to argue about. Other AIOs pack inferior hardware (Apple is yet the only company to manage to get a gaming-level GPU into the AIO) at the same time being bigger/bulkier, and the funny thing is that the iMac is still priced very competitively.

----------


Yeah, I already found that page but decided not to quote it because a) not sure how legit that is and b) it does not make the Asus AIO any more attractive.
 
I'd still buy it if it came with a 680MX gpu and I could buy TODAY.

It's also BS that macrumors stopped the update clock on the iMac in the buyer's guide. It's NOT OUT YET. The clock should still be ticking.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.