Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Electric motors controlled by Apple software, connected to iCloud, using LIDAR for safety, with a new type of Battery tech, with FaceID as a key to enter and start the engine, with a spatial audio sound system, HUD with directions, all controlled by M-series chips.

Could be interesting, as long as I can opt-out of the insane so-called ‘self-driving’ part.

Pretty sure that when the apple car comes out it won’t even have “self-driving.” Driver-assist, sure. But not “self-driving.”
 
geex 125 million. maybe justto save time... but apple couldn't have built it on their own?
 
According to Google Maps the site is way bigger.

Chrisler.jpg
 
Another piece of real estate (1100 acres in size) in northern Maricopa County (Phoenix, AZ area) was recently acquired by Taiwan semiconductor firm TSMC. A map showing the location can be seen here:
It's only about 12 miles southeast from this former Chrysler car testing ground, mentioned as having been recently purchased by Apple in Wittman, AZ.
 
Last edited:
So IF the rumor that Apple bought this set track, then it must be #1 from your list - why would you need a 4mil test track for an embedded piece of ecosystem?
These test track have historically served for mechanical evaluation, sure don't need one for autonomous driving ...

Waymo, the leader in the field, has its own mock urban proving ground.

Amazing that Chrysler had so many overheating problems back in the day with those proving grounds. /s

I don’t think it is necessary for Apple to own it’s own facility. There are facilities across the country that corporations such as Apple / etc do reserve for testing vehicles in all kinds of weather. One such facility is in northern Minnesota and often sees various brands do cold weather testing during the winter months. Some wet weather testing in fall & spring as well.

It's not absolutely necessary, as there are rental facilities available, but it certainly makes the engineers' jobs much easier to have unfettered, exclusive access to such facilities.

Despite no official acknowledgement of the project, and its skunkworks-like nature, Apple hasn't been shy about committing resources to it. What may or may not eventually result is still the big question.
 
In my mind, let's say the rumors are spot on and Apple is looking to develop either 1) an apple car or 2) have a peice of it's ecosystem embedded in the car...I cannot envision what that would bring to the table above and beyond a Tesla. I'm sure it will be a premium product with a price tag to match however above and beyond this?
Tesla is noted to have sub-par after sales experience. Apple would not allow this. Apple are the world’s most well known product design company and have many car designers working for them. They also have thousand(s) of car engineers working for them for years. I’d expect some serious design inside and out. Will Tesla cars be faster than Apple’s? Probably. Will they be better designed? Unlikely. Will Apple have a better after sales experience. Given then history of the company I’d bet that is guaranteed.

It’s not about being better than Tesla in every way, it’s about focusing on design, experience, build quality, after sales and customer service. They don’t have to be better than Tesla in every way. They need simply (relatively) make a great and attractive car that does the job and is reliable. This is the beginning of the EV market, not the tail end. Apple are getting in at the right time when the technology is catching up to the needs of customers regarding range and charging speed.

The car won't work unless you own an iPhone. Anyone disagree? 🤣
I disagree.
 
Last edited:
Apple has been wasting time on this car project. It is too many years behind Google and Baidu. By the time Apple comes up with something usable, the market would have been fully taken up. When Apple is not the creator of a market, it never made meaningful splash. In another word, Apple is never good at competing in a field others created.
Dead wrong.... They really entered the market late smartphone-wise... And look at where it took the entire industry..
 
Apple has been wasting time on this car project. It is too many years behind Google and Baidu. By the time Apple comes up with something usable, the market would have been fully taken up. When Apple is not the creator of a market, it never made meaningful splash. In another word, Apple is never good at competing in a field others created.
Because all the current car manufacturers were there on Day 1 with (modern day) Audi, Oldsmobile, Mercedes, and Ford. 🙄

By the way, being one of the “originals” didn’t work out so well for Oldsmobile…
 
I'm a rather loyal Tesla owner. I'm never going back to gas/diesel. Most of the EVs that are coming out these days are compromises. But if there's one company that could "put the right package together", it's Apple. Apple wouldn't have any problem buying/licensing some of what they need. And they could do worse than leverage Tesla's experience if they wanted a huge, inexpensive charging network and self-driving capabilities. One of my only complaints about my Tesla is the lack of CarPlay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klunernet
According to you, the autonomous car market is all wrapped up but I'm still trying to summon a single self driving car to come pick me up. What am I doing wrong here?
You can summon your Tesla. You just have to own the vehicle to hail it.

It's nice to use when you come out of a building and it's raining - just summon the car across the parking lot to pick you up.
 
There are several proving grounds nearby, both Volvo and Toyota have one nearby.

Volvo ring is substantially smaller while the Toyota one is insanely big.

There are several in Michigan, and one large one is currently for sale. For a cool $75 million, one can have a pretty amazing course, from what I've read about it. Hmm... Are they selling now to entice an Apple bid?

With Apple's software bug count, rate, and longevity I can't see any rational human wanting an Apple car or to drive one that uses Apple AI.

Imagine Siri in control of your car. OMG, just say it ain't so!

Yeah, but given the huge gaping holes in other manufacturers security, some having no passwords, no encryption, Apple really could do a batter job. I think an Apple Car could be a ground changing product. It could be the one to rule them all. I'm not looking for 'self driving', because I think that is still far too soon, but Apple can still come out with a stellar offering...

Don't count them out. They could also become a focus for a future in that market, getting companies to follow them in different directions.
 


A former Chrysler proving grounds for automotive testing outside of Phoenix, Arizona, that has been rumored to be used by Apple was recently purchased for $125 million by the firm that has been leasing it for the past five years, according to AZ Big Media.

arizona-car-proving-grounds.jpg

Back in 2017, it was reported that a company by the name of Route 14 Investment Partners LLC had signed a lease to use the facility, with rumors suggesting Apple was behind the deal, although there was no definitive proof of the link. Route 14 is represented by the Phoenix office of law firm Greenberg Traurig, hiding the true ownership of the company.

Route 14 has now exercised an option to purchase the property, which consists of 34 separate parcels, for $125 million in cash. The purchase agreement is dated June 25, 2021, with a deed and assumption of an existing development agreement with the City of Surprise both dated July 30 and seen by MacRumors.

arizona-car-proving-grounds-affidavit.jpg

We have still not been able to concretely tie Apple to Route 14, but it's clear that whoever is behind the firm has deep pockets and a long-term interest in the testing facility.

Rumors about Apple's work on both autonomous driving systems and actual electric vehicles have ebbed and flowed over the last several years. The most recent report just this week claimed that Apple has been visiting with Toyota as it seeks to develop a supplier network with an eye toward producing an Apple-branded car starting in 2024.

(Thanks, Jacob!)

Article Link: Arizona Vehicle Testing Site Rumored to Be Used by Apple Purchased for $125 Million
Interesting that they chose to purchase rather than continue to lease. For a non-real estate company, owning your own real estate isn't typically advantageous unless they plan to make major changes to the property or want more control over it than their lease would allow...
 
Apple has been wasting time on this car project. It is too many years behind Google and Baidu. By the time Apple comes up with something usable, the market would have been fully taken up. When Apple is not the creator of a market, it never made meaningful splash. In another word, Apple is never good at competing in a field others created.
This is literally one of the dumbest things I have ever read about Apple in over 25 years. It's such a stupid comment I had to log in for the first time in years just to correct you.

Apple didn't create the personal computer. But it made it better and more personal with the Apple 2 and then the Mac. Apple didn't invent the cell phone or the MP3 player, but made them all better and went to become the world's most valuable company and brand because of that.

Apple wasn't in making headphones or watches but have the worlds best selling in both categories. Apple was never in the music business but revolutionized the buying of music. It was said Apple couldn't succeed in retail but have the worlds most profitable store per square foot. Apple couldn't make it's own silicon and would fail and now have the best in class chips across every platform they compete in.

Other than the home speaker market and streaming content, it's hard to think of a category people like you said Apple couldn't do that they didn't crush everyone else who was there first or the market leader.

Ask Micheal Dell, and the former CEO's of Intel, Microsoft, and Blackberry for their famous last words before they retired.
 
Last edited:
Apple has been wasting time on this car project. It is too many years behind Google and Baidu. By the time Apple comes up with something usable, the market would have been fully taken up. When Apple is not the creator of a market, it never made meaningful splash. In another word, Apple is never good at competing in a field others created.
This post is either the work of a Russian troll farm, pure sarcasm or Steve Ballmer.

This is is literally one of the dumbest things I have ever read about Apple in over 25 years. It's such a stupid comment I had to log in for the first time in years just to correct you.

Apple didn't create the computer. But it made it better and personal with the Apple 2 and then the Mac. Apple didn't invent the cell phone or the MP3 player, but made them all better and went to become the world's most valuable company and brand because of that.

Apple wasn't in making headphones or watches but have the worlds best selling in both categories. Apple was never in the music business but revolutionized the buying of music. It was said Apple couldn't succeed in retail but have the worlds most profitable store per square foot. Apple couldn't make it's own silicon and would fail and now have the best in class chips across every platform they compete in.

Other than the home speaker market and streaming content, it's hard to think of a category people like you said Apple couldn't do that they didn't crush everyone else who was there first or the market leader.

Ask Micheal Dell, and the former CEO's of Intel, Microsoft, and Blackberry for their famous last words before they retired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsplusmacs
Wait a minute. Am I the only one here surprised that Chrysler ever even HAD a proving ground?

I don't know what's worse, not having a proving ground or having one but never figuring out how to use it!

Yeah, not a Chrysler fan.
 
Balmer. Is that guy still around? My first smartphone was a Windows device with the slide-out keyboard and a stylus. Sold it to a friend so I could go with a Motorolla Droid. After that one, I never looked back, not even when a couple of friends got Windows Phones a few years later. I went to iPhone because I couldn't de-install some stupid stuff that had been preinstalled on the Samsung.

The only reason I'm thinking of going back to an Android device is well, I don't want my stuff snooped on by my vendors and I don't want to be falsely accused of a crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TakeshimaIslands
Tesla is noted to have sub-par after sales experience. Apple would not allow this. Apple are the world’s most well known product design company and have many car designers working for them. They also have thousand(s) of car engineers working for them for years. I’d expect some serious design inside and out. Will Tesla cars be faster than Apple’s? Probably. Will they be better designed? Unlikely.
As long as I don't have to buy my next car in "rose gold". 😬
Will Apple have a better after sales experience. Given then history of the company I’d bet that is guaranteed.
I can't wait to unbox my first Apple iCar. I'm especially looking forward to peeling that little plastic pull-tab off the door so that I can be assured that I'm the FIRST person opening that door!
It’s not about being better than Tesla in every way, it’s about focusing on design, experience, build quality, after sales and customer service.
I'm looking forward to the test-drives with a frightened, white-knuckled Genius in the passenger seat! Vrrrooooommm!

Oh wait, an electric car won't go "vroom", will it?
They don’t have to be better than Tesla in every way. The need simply to make a great car that does that job and is reliable. Regarding EVs this is the beginning of the market, not the tail end. Apple are getting in at the right time when the technology is catching up to the needs of customers regarding range and charging speed.
But will the car have a notch and will the box include a charger? 🤭;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.