Originally posted by beatle888
NOPE![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
THAT RIGHT COMES WITH THEIR AMERICAN CITIZANSHIP.
OH DAMN I GOTTA LEAVE THIS THREAD.
LONG LIVE THE AMERICAN
yuck. down with caps lock! ha
Originally posted by beatle888
NOPE![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
THAT RIGHT COMES WITH THEIR AMERICAN CITIZANSHIP.
OH DAMN I GOTTA LEAVE THIS THREAD.
LONG LIVE THE AMERICAN
Originally posted by NavyIntel007
By the way, saying that a degree from Harvard makes you smart is like saying a bible wielding preacher is always a saint. I know some pretty stupid people at Harvard.
Originally posted by NavyIntel007
But just because they are famous and make a lot of money doesn't mean they have to try to express their opinions to influence the public all the time.
Originally posted by jelloshotsrule
and yet you say that none have run for office? you seem to contradict yourself..
also, should arnold schwarzenegger should also shut up about politics? and dennis miller? and other conservatives? or is it just the rich and famous liberals that can't speak their opinions in this free countr?
Originally posted by NavyIntel007
The point is we're at war, get over it. Your million dollars and designer clothes bitching about it isn't going to change it one way or another.
Originally posted by wdlove
I think that with the war going on they should be respectful. If they don't like our policies they can always move to France. Then they won't have to be ashamed to be an American. Being public figures they affect our troop.
I made a phone call to my local ABC station to voice my displeaure with the Hollywood Elite.
Originally posted by beatle888
i just thought it would be nice for you all to read this post again. im sorry but it doesnt seem to be from someone who believes in freedom. this isnt ment to offend. i just think we need to respect each others opinions if we want to be a true america.
Originally posted by G4scott
As for my second post being pro-violence: I was trying to make a point. It shows that in a world of violence, peace and non-aggression don't always work.
Originally posted by pseudobrit
Iraq has never attacked the United States and does not pose an imminent threat to any of her citizens.
Originally posted by pseudobrit
Bravo to you for speaking out! Have you called your Senators and Representatives? The White House? Let them know how you feel! Everyone who feels strongly pro or con should.
Also, that goes for you. I think it's wonderful that you speak out here, and I think it's wonderful that they speak out there. Regardless the size of the audience, it's America at work when you can speak your mind.
As for moving abroad, would you have gone away while Clinton was president if you didn't agree with his policies? No? Then why should they?
And again, not supporting the administration does not mean you do not support the troops.
It is possible to have two differing views at the same time: anti-Saddam and anti-war; pro-troops and anti-administration, etc. You cannot tie a bad idea to a good idea and float them as one to discredit an argument.
"If Saddam Hussein fails to comply and we fail to act or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop his program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of sanctions and ignore the commitments he's made? Well, he will conclude that the international community's lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on doing more to build an arsenal of devastating destruction. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow. The stakes could not be higher. Some way, someday, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal."
... It has been said openly in the media and even to us, from the highest command, that the purpose of establishing Saddam's fighters is to attack American targets and American interests. This is known. There's no doubt about it.
All this training is directed towards attacking American targets, and American interests. The training does not only include hijacking of planes and sabotage. ... Some other people were trained to do parachuting. Some other areas were training on how to penetrate enemy lines and get information from behind enemy lines. But it's all for the general concept of hitting and attacking American targets and American interests.
That was your reaction on September 11 -- that some of these people might be involved?
I assure you, this operation was conducted by people who were trained by Saddam. And I'm going to keep assuring the world this is what happened.
Osama bin Laden has no such capabilities. Why? Because this kind of attacks must be, and has to be, organized by a capable state, such as Iraq; a state where they can provide high level of training, and they can provide high level of intelligence to do such training.
How could Osama bin Laden -- who's hiding in the middle of nowhere in Afghanistan in small caves and valleys -- train people and gather information and send people to do such high-level operation? We all know this is a high-level operation. This cannot be done by a person who does not even own a plane in Afghanistan, who cannot offer such training in Afghanistan. This is definitely done by a mastermind like Saddam. ...
And the camp has a 707 that they train on?
Yes, there's a real whole 707 plane, a whole real plane, standing in the middle of the training area in this camp.
Originally posted by NavyIntel007
Right, but you're assuming that the ones that are in the military, the ones that are serving public office deserve to be demoralized by all of this? These actors wouldn't know what to do if they got a jury duty card...
Originally posted by beatle888
NOPE![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
THAT RIGHT COMES WITH THEIR AMERICAN CITIZANSHIP.
OH DAMN I GOTTA LEAVE THIS THREAD.
LONG LIVE THE AMERICAN
Originally posted by Backtothemac
No, because their actions are boarderlining on treason. Very, very close. At least Michael Moores statements are nearly on the verge of treason. The rest are just stupid statements by overpaid actors that have little understanding of the world, or anything else.
No, because their actions are boarderlining on treason. Very, very close. At least Michael Moores statements are nearly on the verge of treason. The rest are just stupid statements by overpaid actors that have little understanding of the world, or anything else.
Originally posted by the future
Do you realize that there is NOT ONE COUNTRY in the whole wide world ? except the US, that is ? where a majority of the population thinks the war on Iraq is justified? Strange, isn't it? You might as well face the fact that the Bush administration and the american media are brainwashing you big time. And it's really frightening.
Originally posted by the future
Do you realize that there is NOT ONE COUNTRY in the whole wide world ? except the US, that is ? where a majority of the population thinks the war on Iraq is justified? Strange, isn't it? You might as well face the fact that the Bush administration and the american media are brainwashing you big time. And it's really frightening.