Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well if you are going to count every single carrier, then the US has a heck of a lot of them too, go to this page to see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_wireless_communications_service_providers

But if you want to consider major, national providers, then Canada pretty much has two Big ones, Bell and Rogers. Videotron has a presence in Quebec, and Telus does have a presence in some markets, but in Telus' case they don't share Bell's towers for no reason. Overall, there are two major infrastructures. That might change in the future, I sure hope it does, but right now them be the facts.


Its the big 3 in Canada, bell and telus have the same amount of customers. Do a google search, they always talk about the big 3.

Bell has 7.3 million customers
Telus has 7.2 million customers
Rogers 9.3 million customers

Bell uses telus towers where there are no bell towers for there old CDMA networks, the hspa network was built together. I believe there lte towers are seperate as bell offers lte and telus does not.

Anyways you said all the others carriers in Canada use bell and Rogers towers. This is completely false. All the carriers I named have there own towers and occasionally roam on others.

When I lived in Calgary my bell phone worked on telus towers, does this mean bell is not a national carrier?
If telus is not a national carrier nor is bell as they both share each others networks.
 
Last edited:
The problem with this comparison is that if you're dabbling with minimal service options from a mobile operator, a pay-as-you-go plan might be more advantageous.

Here's what I pay for

AT&T GoPhone:

$0.10/min voice calls
500MB cellular data for $25, expires after thirty days, but leftover data rolls over if you buy another data package, as low as 10MB for $5.

I use Google Voice for text messages; it's a far better value using cellular data rather than paying $5 for 200 messages or $10 for a thousand. If I don't have WiFi reception I can turn on cellular data, not a big deal, nor big expense.

I'm averaging about 100MB of cellular data and 20 minutes of calls per month, which works out to about $11-13 a month.

If you are a low-voice, low-cellular-data user, there are some substantial savings that can be had by going GoPhone Pay As You Go. Yes, I paid full retail for an unlocked iPhone, but that's worth more in the used market.

As far as I can tell, versus the cheapest $55/mo. subsidized contract plan, I will break even in the 10th or 11th month.

Isn't there some subterfuge required in order to use a Pay As You Go sim with a current iPhone? I mean, if you ask an AT&T rep straight up, here I am with my unlocked iPhone 4S that I've already purchased outright, now please let me buy a Pay As You Go sim from you to use in it, aren't they going to tell you it's not allowed, or that it doesn't work?

I'm in the same boat as you usage-wise. I would love to pay for what I in fact use, rather than be locked into plans with countless more minutes and cell data than I will ever use. Paying the high initial cost of a new iPhone is nothing compared to how much one overpays over the length of a contract, if you're not using the minutes and data.

I actually have an ancient iPhone that I'm still using, but will upgrade to a 4S soon. I haven't researched the Go Phone / Pay As You Go options yet, so no need to spell it all out for me if this information is readily available, but I was under the impression that AT&T can tell which device is using a PAYG sim, and if it was in an iPhone 4S, they'd force you to upgrade...? Can you point me in the right direction?

The only downside I can imagine for a low voice low data user using a PAYG sim on an iPhone 4S is that apparently the "Go Phone" coverage is worse than standard issue coverage, so for rural areas you may not get a signal, where if you were on contract the coverage is better.

Thanks for any insight you have!
 
Verizon?

Should we be expecting a Verizon blog post about how they are updating their data plans?
 
Quote:
"Customers are using more data than ever before," said David Christopher, chief marketing officer, AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets. "Our new plans are driven by this increasing demand in a highly competitive environment, and continue to deliver a great value to customers, especially as we continue our 4G LTE deployment."

AT&T IS CONTRADICTING ITSELF SAYING "CUSTOMERS ARE USING MORE DATA THAN EVER BEFORE" ALL THE WHILE THEY ARE LOWERING THE USAGE THEY START THROTTLING AT. MONTHS AGO THE TOP 5% WERE BEING THROTTLED AT 10GB AND IN THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS THEY'VE STARTED THROTTLING AT 2GB WHICH MAKES NO SENSE. IF MORE PEOPLE ARE USING DATA IT WOULD DRIVE THE USAGE TOP 5% HIGHER NOT LOWER! IT IS JUST SIMPLE MATH. AT&T IS THROTTLING MORE THAN THE TOP 5% TO BULLY THEM OUT OF THEIR UNLIMITED PLANS INTO MORE EXPENSIVE PLANS. THESE DECEPTIVE PRACTICES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE FCC!

http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm
 
Last edited:
..and your going to go where...Verizon??

Exactly, with the cell phone cartel there's no real competition. All prices are exaggerated.

I have just been to Austria. Orange sells iPad prepaid (no contract) sim cards for 5$/1GB or 10$/3GB. And it's fast damn fast, too.

An Austrian friend pays about $40 for his iPhone with unlimited data and text and 1300 minutes.

He can't believe that the same thing would cost him three time that much in the US.

(Most things are cheaper in the US than in Europe, sometimes substantially cheaper. Only internet access (300% more expensive in the US) and cell phone service (200 to 300% more expensive).

We have a telecommunications problem here, where big corporations have cut out their markets, protected them, and probably have secret arrangements with competitors over pricing.

Also, the service often is sub-par (what many AT&T users will confirm).

We need new laws that free the telecommunications market and have competition there. Otherwise, this part of the US economy will lose more ground to areas like Europe, where the telecommunication infrastructure is much better than the outdated and slow networks we have here in the US.
 
Last edited:
Why? I've I've had the iPhone since the very first one, two months in. I've NEVER reset my Cellular Network Data statistics and I am at 1.4GB total Sent and 9.8GB total Received. That is an average of around 250MB per month and coincides with my monthly AT&T bills from 150-350MB a month. I can't imagine using the 2GB per month AT&T gives new iPhone users, let alone needing unlimited.

Meh, I've never been able to understand how people can go through gigabytes of data. For me my mobile device has always been a complimentary service to my existing fixed line broadband rather than a replacement hence my I've never hit higher than 300MB in a month. The highest I hit was almost a year ago when I went on holiday with my laptop and used my Sierra Wireless 3G stick where I clocked up a few gigs whilst I was away - but that is the exception rather than the norm.

Unlimited data is just unsustainable - something has to give somewhere in the equation as there is a limit to the capacity of each tower then add on top of that trying to get up new towers is like a trip to hell and back. Just look every time a mobile phone vendor tries to put up a new tower and half the neighbourhood believes their brains will be fried to a crisp if they allow it anywhere near their house.

As a consumer you're squeezed on one side by technology and the other side by NIMBY's hell bent on ensuring that any additional capacity is next to impossible to add and if it is added that the carrier has clocked up so much additional costs that they have to recoup it some way (aka higher charges for its customers).

Good for you two. Just because you don't have the use for it, or didn't sign up for unlimited, doesn't mean that those who signed up for unlimited should be binned into your usage category.

We unlimited users aren't sitting here blaming you lower-paying people for not paying for our unlimited services and trying to force you into a plan you don't want... so don't do it to us.
 
typical att. ive been with them since 05' and the service has always been terrible. they have one texting option $20, now they raise the minimum data to $20 but also keep it just low enough that the people buying it either wont use much of it or will go over and buy another $20. counting down the days until my contract expires...
 
at&t is altering the way the Iru discounts are being applied to data plans. As a short answer no it won't qualify. I read a little into it yesterday but i can't remember everything it stated. I remember something like only the 30 dollar data plan for 3gb was going to be discounted the 25 dollar 2gb plan that was discounted before isn't going to be anymore. Don't take this word for word as i didn't bother to memorize what was listed. (i know this because i work for the company)

That would be no good. I just switched up to the $25 because it's only $19 after my discount. If they remove the discount I'll be screwed out of the $15 data plan! Where did you read this information and what company do you work for?
 
Sweden and the USA have pretty similar population densities so cellular coverage comparisons are actually relevant, at least more so than with Japan or South Korea.

It's worth pointing out that Sweden had LTE long before the USA. There's little excuse for this. The technology was available to everyone around the same time. What is notable is that AT&T did not have winning bids on the 700MHz spectrum in the FCC auction, and waiting several years to buy this spectrum from Qualcomm. One interpretation would be a definite lack of commitment into securing their future.

The USA has a much higher population density than Sweden according to Wikipedia.

Also, it's about total area, not density. One company doesn't have enough capital to build such a large infrastructure. Upgrade all of America to 4G? It's tough. Besides, it's best to not use mobile internet for anything besides text so you don't waste your bandwidth. Also, in some areas (including LA, where I live), 4G is not actually faster since the bottleneck is at the station's outdated wired connections.

Those ads where people are happy about receiving texts and stuff faster because they are on 4G are total BS. It wouldn't make a difference for a 30-character message.
 
Free Mobile $25

"Free Mobile sparks French telecoms war"

Not “Free” but certainly inexpensive

"What has the French in a frenzy? In summary, Niel, at a Paris event launching his new mobile service, said Free Mobile would charge €19.99 a month for a service with unlimited texts, domestic calls and data and free calls to 40 countries in Europe and North America. As FT noted, this compares with €49.40 for an almost identical offer by France Telecom’s new low-cost service, SoSh. Free also will be offering an even cheaper deal of €2 for 60 texts and 60 minutes of calls a month.

While the service packages do not include a phone, Free upped the ante with an announcement that it will offer the iPhone 4S starting January 27 as follows:"

http://www.techzone360.com/topics/t...e-makes-life-les-miserables-french-mobile.htm

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7cc58228-3b72-11e1-bb39-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1jyPuswR2
 

Attachments

  • peter 1 10 1.jpg
    peter 1 10 1.jpg
    21.5 KB · Views: 89
Free

Unbelievable $20-$30 only for data!!!
I wish Mr. Xavier Niel will buy T-Mobile in U.S then sets the low Price like he did in France for $25 a months no contract with unlimited texts, domestic calls and data. I am sure the big three will drop the price.
 
I hope they know what they are doing.

It's sort of like the jail breaking phenomenon: The corporation makes changes that about 15% of the active community thereupon spends untold temporal resources trying to get around.

Seems like a lot of wasted effort all the way around, and although I find AT&T service affordable, it's hard not to wonder why service is cheaper and faster in other countries.
 
Good for you two. Just because you don't have the use for it, or didn't sign up for unlimited, doesn't mean that those who signed up for unlimited should be binned into your usage category.

We unlimited users aren't sitting here blaming you lower-paying people for not paying for our unlimited services and trying to force you into a plan you don't want... so don't do it to us.
No, "you unlimited users" are the ones creating these crappy data plans. The few that abuse something, ruin it for everyone else. Same with the tiered broadband at home they are trying to implement. To stop those 1% that use terabytes of data a month for piracy.
 
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


Image

AT&T today announced new smartphone data plans with larger data allocations, the first update to AT&T's plans since June of 2010. The plans kick in this Sunday, January 22.
The smartphone plans include unlimited access to AT&T Wi-Fi Hotspots, and replace the current $15/$25 data plans:

- AT&T DataPlus 300MB: $20 for 300MB, additional 300MB for $20.
- AT&T DataPro 3GB: $30 for 3GB, additional 1GB for $10/each
- AT&T DataPro 5GB: $50 for 5GB, with mobile hotspot/tethering, additional 1GB for $10/each

iPad 3G users can now choose from one of three plans:

- The existing 250MB for $15 plan
- AT&T DataConnect 3GB: $30 for 3GB
- AT&T DataConnect 5GB: $50 for 5GB

Current users can keep their plans, but as of Sunday, all new smartphone and tablet service contracts will have to use one of these plans.

Article Link: AT&T Introduces New Smartphone Data Plans w/3GB and 5GB Options



I wonder how this will affect the Data plus WiFi hotsopt? I have unlimited now but if I could get 3GB with WiFi hotspot, I would drop unlimited, I only use 1.2 GB of my Unlimited, I do not need more than 3GB per month then, and I refuse to pay 5GB for $50.00, just wish they would allow you to tether with the 3GB Plan.
 
Across the board price increase. For no reason. This doesn't serve customers in the slightest. Nor does this compete with Verizon's 4GB for $30 or Sprint's unlimited plan.

When I saw the headline, I was momentarily excited. I thought maybe we'd finally get family data. Or maybe a new cheaper plan for those of us that actually know how to conserve data and are primarily on wifi. But then I read the details, and it's full-on fail.

I'm paying them $1 per MB already. Isn't that enough profit?

Your paying $1 per MB? That's $2048.00 for your 2GB plan! You sir, are getting ripped off. Or just not telling the truth.
 
When people make this arguement it sounds stupid. More smartphone users also means more subscriptions which means more people paying for that network. Economy of scale lowers prices, not raises them. I can't believe the ignorance I hear on here soemtimes.

Right, because obviously you know AT&T's fixed costs haven't raised and therefore have been maintaining the same fixed cost per subscriber margin this entire time.
 
No, "you unlimited users" are the ones creating these crappy data plans. The few that abuse something, ruin it for everyone else. Same with the tiered broadband at home they are trying to implement. To stop those 1% that use terabytes of data a month for piracy.

NO! No one is "creating crappy data plans"! No one! AT&T is a private company. There is not some public resource that needs to be "managed" or allocated- AT&T is creating their data plans- they are a private company that is in business to make money. They are not in business to manage a resource.

There Is no abuse by anyone unless they are somehow hacking ATT's network. An unlimited plan means you can download as much as you want. The end. AT&T takes it away- that is a market and business decision. Not a punishment.

For crying out loud- they could charge a billion dollars a megabyte to use their network if they wanted to. As consumers, we need to stop buying in to this "we have to do it because some of you are bad" crap! If we do not like att's plans, we simply go with another carrier when our contract is up. That's it.
 
Data Schmata

If AT&T data management was better with their hotspots, and relay towers, they would not have this issue. Raising the bar? More like raising the linings in their pockets! It took me 3 months of fighting AT&T to FINALLY allow me to cancel service without getting hit with an early termination fee (ETF)! I was a unlimited data user, until they started throttling me. I got throttled every month. And the sad part is you never know when they are going to start. I know, I got the two text messages before they throttled, but come on!. One month I got the texts when I approached 10GB, the next month, was like 5. The last month I got texted-then-throttled - 3.9! That's absurd!
It's like I had been playing the game of baseball with AT&T for 5 years, and all of a sudden this year, they want to change the rules of the game OF baseball. How rude! Phunk Dat!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.