I got 30 mb down when I had my Galaxy Note in downtown Chicago.
The LTE spectrum is fine here.
Then maybe they added more?
I got 30 mb down when I had my Galaxy Note in downtown Chicago.
The LTE spectrum is fine here.
Then maybe they added more?
Former AT&T customer here. Not sure about their LTE coverage as the 5 will be my first device with LTE, but their regular coverage is abysmal in downtown Chicago. Dropped calls, dead zones, and data is ridiculously, almost hair-pullingly slow. I mean, unable to send a text, unable to pull a 250kb word document - just bad all around. Their customer service has been pretty good and understanding (they even provided me with one of those home hotspot booster thingies), but I had to make the switch to Verizon.
Anecdotally, all friends on Verizon in Chicago area have great LTE. We'll see how the networks are doing on Friday around 4:00 p.m. CST.
Yeah but most of us have been with AT&T forever. A lot of us don't want to give up our unlimited data plans for Verizon's mobile share data plans.
If I went to Verizon I'd have to pay $110/mo before taxes and that only gets me 4GB. With AT&T I get the same plus unlimited data (5GB) for only $80/mo with my discounts.
Never will I go to Verizon. Though I will add, they do have more consistent service than AT&T.
I thought hard about that (had unlimited data too), and then I looked at my usage over the past few years. 2GB, 3GB, 2.5GB - rarely did I get close to 4GB. And wi-fi has only become more ubiquitous lately.
AT&T can throttle unlimited data plan owners at any time, and I fully expect them to in the coming months. AT&T has demonstrated antipathy towards concepts like net neutrality, and seems to be more interested in getting customers than building and updating the infrastructure to support those customers. I'd rather pay a premium ($20 or $30) for better service and have a reliable phone than hang on to the mere theory of "unlimited," which is sadly becoming more and more scarce.
Former AT&T customer here. Not sure about their LTE coverage as the 5 will be my first device with LTE, but their regular coverage is abysmal in downtown Chicago. Dropped calls, dead zones, and data is ridiculously, almost hair-pullingly slow. I mean, unable to send a text, unable to pull a 250kb word document - just bad all around. Their customer service has been pretty good and understanding (they even provided me with one of those home hotspot booster thingies), but I had to make the switch to Verizon.
Anecdotally, all friends on Verizon in Chicago area have great LTE. We'll see how the networks are doing on Friday around 4:00 p.m. CST.
I agree completely about using data downtown. It's almost pretty pointless now.
I got 30 mb down when I had my Galaxy Note in downtown Chicago.
The LTE spectrum is fine here.
where did you find this out?
EDIT: I googled and saw articles relating to the 10 mhz, but how accurate are they is my question.
NO the OP is not ridiculous. I was not expecting to get 50 down in the city. No one will achieve that unless maybe its 3 in the morning. However, in the burbs where there is less population one could easily pull that if the spectrum allowed it.
With 10mhz those of us in burbs will average around 20mbps down when those in 20mhz will probably pull 40-50 down in their suburbs.
AT&T just isn't reliable in Chicago, might LTE be different who knows. Here is an old post of mine from last year about what happened to me when I actually needed to use my at&t phone for an emergency and couldn't. Been with Verizon ever since and will gladly pay more money for reliable service and peace of mind.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1268647/