That's because of metric bits.
Forgive me.. but is this a science joke or is that serious? Does it work that way? I really don't know ha ha
That's because of metric bits.
Presumed by whom, and why?
I'm getting 8.5 in my living room and 7.11 in the bedroom. Can that be right?
This better affect the iPhone 3g. I know its a network, but it seems from the article that the new Summer iPhone is the only one that can take advantage of it. I would gladly pay 5-10$ more a month for better signal strength/ speed on my 3g.
but I mean, do you think they will try to mainstream it and position themselves as an ISP?
As the article said, HSPA+ has a downlink speed of 21 mbps while the LTE (4G) network is said to have downlink speeds of around 100 mbps.
Can't wait for the iPhone LTE!!!
did you read the article?
It should be 3.6Mbit in DL.
Btw we are getting 21Mbit in Sweden (all major cities, the "3" network) and the LTE planning and ordering has already started by Tele2, Telenor and TeliaSonera.
If they get up to 21 Mbps do you think they will start to offer that as a plan for people's personal computers? I know you already can with a built in 3G card or dongle, but I mean, do you think they will try to mainstream it and position themselves as an ISP? The only problem being cell reception is always worse indoors...21 Mbps is faster than what you can get from either the DSL or cable company in my area.
Is it true that this is merely a software upgrade at it's existing locations so the area of coverage (or not) stays basically the same?
Forgive me.. but is this a science joke or is that serious? Does it work that way? I really don't know ha ha![]()
I second this, their 3G network is garbage compared to Verizon Wireless.
My iPhone barely gets over 1 mbps in Kansas City. So that would make the new iPhone about 2.5-3 Mbps?
I second this, their 3G network is garbage compared to Verizon Wireless.
wow that stinks. i have comcast, and pay the same price but get an advertised 12Mbps. but have gotten up to 30 on speedtest.net![]()