AT&T was willing to bend over more to be associated with the slim and hip of the world.
🙄
AT&T was willing to bend over more to be associated with the slim and hip of the world.
Verizon would've known that the iPhone would be extremely successful, and I bet they would've taken it in.
I just don't understand, what would be so bad about Verizon that Apple goes with AT&T?
The fact of the matter is that no single carrier has complete, sufficient coverage. It doesn't take a genius to understand why that is. Cellular service is still somewhat young for being a large infrastructural development. It has only been a little more than a decade where cellular phones and plans have become affordable enough for nearly everyone to own one.
I hear the same explanation from many people. "I use fill in carrier name because they have the best coverage in my area". Makes sense to me. Maybe those who got blindly sucked into the iPhone should have done a little more research and reconsidered what is more important, cool phone or reliable service. The only person to blaim is Apple for making a cool phone and establishing an exclusive deal with AT&T.
For myself, it just so happens that AT&T's service has always been perfectly fine where I live. I don't recall ever having a dropped call. It was a no-brainer for me to get an iPhone.
That's is ridiculous to say. I shouldn't have to do research for a flipping cell phone service I used to have verizon and man am i upset i switch I got service EVERYWHERE! Now with AT&T I get it nowhere, and I really don't think I had to do research in this day in age i shouldn't have to go to the highest point everywhere I am just to get one bar.
I live in Las Vegas. I've had no 3G or Edge problems in any part of this town in a 90 mile radius.
BL.
Can't blame AT&T for sucking, the problem is the exclusive contract they have. The only people that like are Apple and AT&T. It's never in the interest of the consumer and this is why.
DELLsFAN said:Isn't that just hilarious!
I traveled with two separate 3G iPhones both purchased in the New England area. Both had excellent voice coverage and indicated 3G service for all of the trip, but I was lucky to be able to connect to the internet at ALL for the majority of the trip.
In town, on the strip, in hotels, the same story ... MAYBE I could connect and surf or send/receive email. Power cycled the phones more times during the vacation than I care to remember - with little to no change in service - poor, in summary.
The phones worked normally when I arrived back home. You tell ME ... I couldn't figure it out ... Whatever bummed my phones in Vegas STAYED in Vegas. Hooray for you ... but I was not impressed with AT&T there.
Oh the head!!!!!!.. What's with the tilting????
That's true, but those networks were paid for using billions of Euros in public taxpayer's money... as in, massively subsidized, just like GSM was before it.
Do you really think that would be the case if Orange, Vodaphone and others had to pay for it with billions of their own money??
So if you're pi$$ed, write to your senator and ask him for a tax increase to cover the AT&T buildout!
🙄
I'll believe it when I see it. AT&T was sketchy when I started using them about 10 years ago, but they've gotten absolutely horrendous over the last 6-12 months. So many dropped/inaudible calls and the data speeds and coverage is very pokey compared to Verizon. We'll see, but I don't have a lot of faith in them. The iPhone is the greatest mobile device ever, but it's ruined by the AT&T experience.
Actually your are very far from the truth. Yes Orange, Vodafone did pay for their network with their own money.
In most European countries the telephone companies have to pay a heavy license fee to the government just to get a 3G license and further more agree to a specific network rollout with in a fixed timeframe.
In my country, Denmark, 4 licenses were sold to a price ox aprox. 190 million dollars per license and All the operators have to cover at least 80% of the population within 6 years.
Translated to US terms a company like AT&T would have to pay uncle Sam around 10 billion dollars in license fees just for the license.
Yes the GSM system was subsidized with public taxpayer money - but not the network rollout. The european governments funded the development of the GSM system and made laws so only GSM phones were allowed in the 900 Mhz spectrum thous banning every other techonology to gain momentum.
Anyway - I feel sorry for all you American iPhone users. I only get an average of 3 mbit/s of download with my local carrier... in primetime. Dropped calls? Never heard about it. MMS - worked from day one.