AT&T to Acquire T-Mobile USA for $39 Billion

T-Mobile hotspots

anyone laying over in the ATL knows that T-Mobile hotspots blanket the entire airport, If this means free wi-fi, I'm excited.
 
Where did you hear this from? As I stated before, recent announcements from AT&T point to their pricing becoming higher and restrictive. They're basically saying, were going to charge you more, so get used to it now.

My father is dating the owner of AT&T. They're looking into competing more with Verizon to decrease there value and enhance our users. At least thats the dinner convo at the house.
 
After reading most of the comments I think that AT&T will keep the T-Mobile bands and upgrade them throughout the next couple years. What I think sounds like a good plan:
• Keep all the bands. This will expand the bandwidth/usage more evenly.
• Most phones support EDGE so that would mean that when current AT&T users leave a covered area by AT&T 3G & EDGE and happen to be on a T-Mobile covered area they can still get service. The same applies for T-Mobile users. This means more coverage!!!
• Eventually (hopefully sooner than later) require that phone manufactures support all the bands or at least EDGE. AT&T can upgrade each cell later to support faster speeds.

Your prices won't go up, AT&T still has to compete with Verizon so just because they are basically the only carrier to have SIM cards they can't pull prices up. Also your current plan won't go up. I have been with AT&T for about 7 years but, at first we where with Cingular; our rate plan no longer exists but we still pay the same thing, you've seen it with Data Grandfathering on the iPhone the same applies to your rate plan.

In my opinion this will be a boost to customers coverage area and your plan won't change either. The only bad thing I see is the job losses from people working at T-Mobile especially at corporate where you'll see that there will no longer be a need for most jobs as AT&T already has people employed to handle then.

I'll have a baggie of whatever you're smoking, buddy.
 
My father is dating the owner of AT&T.

:rolleyes:

AT&T Inc. is a publicly traded company. AT&T Inc. common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. A Fortune 500 company, AT&T is one of the 30 stocks that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Nobody f8cking "owns" AT&T.
 
My father is dating the owner of AT&T. They're looking into competing more with Verizon to decrease there value and enhance our users. At least thats the dinner convo at the house.

Your father is dating all of the tens of thousands of shareholders? Damn, your father is quite the pimp.

If by owner, you mean CEO, then that means your dad is dating a guy named Randall Stephenson. Not that I personally have a problem with that. Is your dad dating Randall?
 
Your father is dating all of the tens of thousands of shareholders? Damn, your father is quite the pimp.

If by owner, you mean CEO, then that means your dad is dating a guy named Randall Stephenson. Not that I personally have a problem with that. Is your dad dating Randall?

Woaaaaaaahhhhhh... that's fascinating. Of course, I must admit that times have changed. :eek:
 
People want a more-complete 3G/4G network, so AT&T moves to acquire a struggling competitor that will give it just that (in a much quicker time frame) and people still complain? :confused:

I'm looking forward to this going through... especially when I see slides like the expected coverage map of states like Michigan and West Virgina.
 
Or...

Why not just spend 39B beefing up your own network?

Guess that would actually take a sense of pride and commitment to you customers. And work. They'd actually have to do some work & maybe even hire people. Wouldn't that be awful?
 
Why not just spend 39B beefing up your own network?

Guess that would actually take a sense of pride and commitment to you customers. And work. They'd actually have to do some work & maybe even hire people. Wouldn't that be awful?

I doubt that the Protestant ethical values exist in this generation today. After all, aren't we the Facebook generation nowadays?
 
It wouldn't matter now it's out now.

You think admitting that you spread inside information about a $39 billion three weeks before it happened doesn't matter? Then you're dumber than you look. Seriously, this is why criminals always get caught. They can't keep their stupid mouth's shut.
 
I doubt that the Protestant ethical values exist in this generation today. After all, aren't we the Facebook generation nowadays?

Facebook generation? Oh, it's even worse than that. Think about how old the people running these companies are. They're all from the age of "peace" & "love" & "good for all humanity". Sound familiar? What a crock. I can't wait 'till I'm that age. We're all Effed.

I have so many great corporate ideas that would have been great 90 years ago. Nowadays they'd just get shot down in the first boardroom meeting. Sometimes I think I'm the last vestige of Protestant Ethical Values on earth.
 
T-Mobile are doing this everywhere, In the Uk they have broken from the German overlords and have joined up with Orange to make Everything Everywhere they still have separate identities e.g. Orange UK and T-Mobile UK they say the plus side is you can use the others signal on your phone but data is not included as of yet plus Orange are getting Visual Voicemail but T-Mobile will not be and will not for the foreseeable future :apple: should make them do it as its 1 of the selling points of the iphone so if the new iphone comes out with something new you can bet top dollar that the UK phone carriers will not have it activated
 
:rolleyes:

AT&T Inc. is a publicly traded company. AT&T Inc. common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. A Fortune 500 company, AT&T is one of the 30 stocks that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Nobody f8cking "owns" AT&T.

Not even Gordon Kekko???? :confused: :eek:
 
Why not just spend 39B beefing up your own network?

Guess that would actually take a sense of pride and commitment to you customers. And work. They'd actually have to do some work & maybe even hire people. Wouldn't that be awful?

Because that would take longer, and your customers would complain the entire time about how slow things are moving. Now they don't have to fight to get cell sites approved or to acquire more spectrum.
 
I was just reading posts about this on yahoo.com. It's like a T-Mobile cry fest. I was laughing my *#* off.
 
Why not just spend 39B beefing up your own network?

Guess that would actually take a sense of pride and commitment to you customers. And work. They'd actually have to do some work & maybe even hire people. Wouldn't that be awful?

People want coverage, but they don't want the towers. People will bitch until they're blue in the face because their coverage sucks, but the second a carrier says they want to build a tower to improve coverage, the same people will bitch until they're blue in the face because they don't want the big, ugly thing in their town. AT&T can't just drop 39 billion and have towers built. There's government red tape, the NIMBY people, etc. It's a lot easier to buy a company and their existing towers than build new ones.

And even if AT&T could magically cut through the government red tape and people said "Sure, you can build a tower here!" there's still the issue of spectrum, which is a finite resource. The tower's no good if it doesn't have spectrum to broadcast on. AT&T gets T-Mobile's towers and spectrum.
 
Sorry but that makes no sense. Those frequencies are worth billions and are very hard to get. The value of tmobile lies on its frequencies and tower infrastructure, not on its small customer base. Plus I believe they they cannot simply phase them out that easily. If they don't use the spectrum, the FCC will take it back and re allocate it. The frequencies are a public resource that is licensed for private profit as long as it serves the public interest and the use of the such frequencies is efficient.

Yes, they're going to use the AWS bands for LTE:

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=13184164
 
I'm happy about this. More coverage for me. I doubt prices would fluctuate for AT&T users that much, or if anything going down some to be more competitive with verizon. T-mobile subscribers may see their prices go up some though they will also be enjoying more coverage in the long run so it would be a pretty fair trade off.
 
Isn't T-mobile GSM? Wouldn't just existing iPhones work on the "new" network?

The EDGE networks they have are compatible, which is why unlocking the iPhone 1 was such a big deal. But now, if you unlock a 3G, 3GS, or 4 onto T-Mobile, you can't use the 3G at all. The freqs (mHz) are different.

For what it's worth, this is fantastic news in Utah, where T-Mobile reception is amazing and AT&T's is just ok. Though again, because of how the 3G signals are incompatible, my guess is that only the call quality woulf improve, but not the 3G?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top