Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can see most of these examples holding true if and only if telcos decide to lighten up on data caps. This could happen, but as time has gone on, we have seen them moving farther and farther away from that.
You have to look at the big picture. The caps will increase along with usage and speed. Data caps on average have been increased significantly over the past several years. Just a few years ago 10GB of cellular data cost a small fortune. Now it's pretty common. Yes, there were more "unlimited" plans initially, but this only worked because even those unlimited customers used a lot less data on average than today (e.g. monthly cellular data usage just 5 years ago was about 450MB on average, today it's around 2GB). It is also likely that we will see more service-specific billing in the future (along the lines of T-Mobile's video "binge" feature).
Not a whole lot of people are going to be downloading entire HD movies in seconds with 2,3 even 10 gb plans. LTE is more than capable enough to handle the latency of most games. I'd venture to guess plenty of people who are wired and playing online games have higher latency than you would generally see on LTE.
I'm not talking about simple online games, but cloud gaming (i.e. the actual game runs on a high-performance server somewhere in the cloud, and the phone app just streams the video and sends the player's controller actions). This requires a very fast feedback loop. There will probably be many more use cases that we can't predict yet. Just look at how mobile data use has changed over the last decade.
 
You have to look at the big picture. The caps will increase along with usage and speed. Data caps on average have been increased significantly over the past several years. Just a few years ago 10GB of cellular data cost a small fortune. Now it's pretty common. Yes, there were more "unlimited" plans initially, but this only worked because even those unlimited customers used a lot less data on average than today (e.g. monthly cellular data usage just 5 years ago was about 450MB on average, today it's around 2GB). It is also likely that we will see more service-specific billing in the future (along the lines of T-Mobile's video "binge" feature).
I'm not talking about simple online games, but cloud gaming (i.e. the actual game runs on a high-performance server somewhere in the cloud, and the phone app just streams the video and sends the player's controller actions). This requires a very fast feedback loop. There will probably be many more use cases that we can't predict yet. Just look at how mobile data use has changed over the last decade.
I am looking at the big picture. And I don't see cloud gaming coming to mobile platforms in the sense that you're predicting. I can see data caps rise, or not. Considering we have continued trending away from that it will take more than 5g tech (IMO) to change that trend.

I would argue that mobile data usage has been very predictable over the last decade. As speeds increased, consumption increased, and telcos reacted by finding new ways to make that money. There isn't a whole lot that incentivizes these folks to give us an all you can eat buffet and, in some countries, even wired internet connection has gone in the direction of data caps. My point is, at some point, you get diminishing returns, and I feel we are at that point, personally.

Data prices also haven't really changed significantly at all over the last few years. People are still paying pretty damn near what they were before, they just don't have the price of their phone baked in anymore. Telcos have also realized that people like paying for data pools rather than individual data lines. I keep a pretty close eye on data prices and who had the most bag for their buck. The best prices on data in recent years have come from adding lines to existing accounts (and the price here isn't even a better price on data, rather a better price per line accessing that data). Again, telcos have realized that getting you to pay an extra $10-20 per line to share the data you're already paying for is the way to go in today's market. Just about the only "clear winner" is the guy who wants a bottom of the barrel data plan. They got rid of the 200mb ridiculous plans because they realized that they were just "cost of owning a smartphone" plan and people hating them; you were paying for a data package because you were forced to, not because you were actually using data. These plans were replaced with 1-3gb plans for (roughly) the same price, so there is indeed value added there.

Anyway, agree to disagree. A world with unlimited data and cloud gaming sounds great to me. It's just not something I'm counting on. Without government intervention we are likely to continue to see caps and/or huge packages that are justified by the telcos by pointing to all of those tower upgrade and maintenance costs they have to dump into their network to get 5g running. In short, from a consumer standpoint, I think there are better things that can be done to a network that don't include 5g data.
 
Last edited:
I am looking at the big picture. And I don't see cloud gaming coming to mobile platforms in the sense that you're predicting. I can see data caps rise, or not. Considering we have continued trending away from that it will take more than 5g tech (IMO) to change that trend.
The only thing we have trended away from is the early unlimited plans, which are simply not a sustainable business model given the cost of wireless spectrum and infrastructure. Apart from that, the caps have always trended upwards.
I would argue that mobile data usage has been very predictable over the last decade.
That is true to some extent (although mobile video in particular has grown much faster than expected). And 5G is being developed with the predicted future usage in mind.
As speeds increased, consumption increased, and telcos reacted by finding new ways to make that money.
And what exactly is wrong with that? They are not charities, after all.
There isn't a whole lot that incentivizes these folks to give us an all you can eat buffet
I'm still not sure why people expect a cheap all-you-can-eat buffet. All this new infrastructure and technology development has to be funded somehow. You may complain about greedy operators, but they have much smaller profit margins than, say, Apple or Google (who wouldn't be what they are today without the mobile networks).
Data prices also haven't really changed significantly at all over the last few years. People are still paying pretty damn near what they were before
On average people get a lot more data for the same price.
Anyway, agree to disagree. A world with unlimited data and cloud gaming sounds great to me. It's just not something I'm counting on. Without government intervention we are likely to continue to see caps and/or huge packages that are justified by the telcos by pointing to all of those tower upgrade and maintenance costs they have to dump into their network to get 5g running. In short, from a consumer standpoint, I think there are better things that can be done to a network that don't include 5g data.
The operators aren't upgrading their networks for fun. Without new technologies they will not be able to keep up with demand and changing requirements.
 
Last edited:
The only thing we have trended away from is the early unlimited plans, which are simply not a sustainable business model given the cost of wireless spectrum and infrastructure. Apart from that, the caps have always trended upwards.
That is true to some extent (although mobile video in particular has grown much faster than expected). And 5G is being developed with the predicted future usage in mind.
And what exactly is wrong with that? They are not charities, after all.
I'm still not sure why people expect a cheap all-you-can-eat buffet. All this new infrastructure and technology development has to be funded somehow. You may complain about greedy operators, but they have much smaller profit margins than, say, Apple or Google (who wouldn't be what they are today without the mobile networks).
On average people get a lot more data for the same price.
The operators aren't upgrading their networks for fun. Without new technologies they will not be able to keep up with demand and changing requirements.
At no point did I say that I had an issue with anyone making a profit, not that I expected an all you can eat buffet. I was simply making factual observations about how rhe industry has shifted towards drasticaly less data, as a whole, and even pontificated as to why that shift has happened. If you feel that data has gone up, tha's fine. Again, Our family has had data plans since around 2005 with the Blackberry pearl, and so I have paid rather good attention to data and no, in my observations, it is not trending towards more data for less, though, as I have said multiple times, that doesn't mean it won't go that way. I also never made mention of greed or anything, so I am unsure where that is coming from.

Again, I am just going to agree to disagree, because now we are at a point where you are making assumptions and putting words into my mouth. You feel 5G tech is the way for ATT to go. Excellent. Point noted.
 
Again, I am just going to agree to disagree, because now we are at a point where you are making assumptions and putting words into my mouth.
That was not my intention. I apologize if it read that way.
You feel 5G tech is the way for ATT to go. Excellent. Point noted.
The entire industry is working on 5G. The R&D work is well underway at this point. But as I mentioned before, the target date for the first rollouts is about 5 years from now, so you can stay with 4G for a while longer. :p
 
The only thing we have trended away from is the early unlimited plans, which are simply not a sustainable business model given the cost of wireless spectrum and infrastructure. Apart from that, the caps have always trended upwards.
That is true to some extent (although mobile video in particular has grown much faster than expected). And 5G is being developed with the predicted future usage in mind.
And what exactly is wrong with that? They are not charities, after all.
I'm still not sure why people expect a cheap all-you-can-eat buffet. All this new infrastructure and technology development has to be funded somehow. You may complain about greedy operators, but they have much smaller profit margins than, say, Apple or Google (who wouldn't be what they are today without the mobile networks).
On average people get a lot more data for the same price.
The operators aren't upgrading their networks for fun. Without new technologies they will not be able to keep up with demand and changing requirements.

Why are they not sustainable? Works great on my T-Mobile service and my speeds are regularly faster than the overpriced and heavily restricted at&t service. Heck, even my call quality is twice as good, especially when calling other t-mobile customers.
 
Why are they not sustainable? Works great on my T-Mobile service and my speeds are regularly faster than the overpriced and heavily restricted at&t service. Heck, even my call quality is twice as good, especially when calling other t-mobile customers.
For one, their "unlimited" plans aren't really unlimited (they throttle the throughput drastically if you use too much data). Also, they are willing to sacrifice profits at the moment since they are in a phase where they are aggressively trying to grow their subscriber base by luring customers from AT&T and Verizon. But this will not last forever.
 
Such technologies are somewhere they rapidly grow and develop , but somewhere praying on fire ...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.