Is the ATI 6970m the desktop GPU or an other marketing bull&$^*&#$@ from Apple?
If it's the real desktop GPU, I'm extremely tempted to get my credit card now and buy the high end 27" model![]()
Oh I see, they put the mobile variant in it. Too bad. Won't order it now then.
I'll wait for reviews first, still looks pretty good so far![]()
All iMacs had a mobile graphics card in the past. So I guess you'll never be ordering one ever?
Is the ATI 6970m the desktop GPU or an other marketing bull&$^*&#$@ from Apple?
If it's the real desktop GPU, I'm extremely tempted to get my credit card now and buy the high end 27" model![]()
It was advertised as the 5750 but is actually a 5850M which is based off the 5750 IIRC.Correct me if I am wrong, but iMac has had the mobile variant of AMD GPUs for a few revisions now, right? I wasn't surprised to see this. I have a 2009 iMac and as far as I know it has the 4850m and last revision it had the 5750m.
The 6850M would have been identical to the 5850M.The 6850/6970m is a very good card. [H]OCP's "real-world, actual gameplay" review shows that it is capable of running a few games (Civ V, F1 2010, Mafia II) at 2560x1440 with decent settings. Games such as BF2 and Metro 2033 run well 1920x1200.
I was expecting a 6850m, but very glad the refreshes are shipping with the 6970m's.
Correct me if I am wrong, but iMac has had the mobile variant of AMD GPUs for a few revisions now, right? I wasn't surprised to see this. I have a 2009 iMac and as far as I know it has the 4850m and last revision it had the 5750m.
It was advertised as the 5750 but is actually a 5850M which is based off the 5750 IIRC.
Does anyone know how the 6770 on the base 27" compares to the 5750 on the high end 27" July 2010 model?
It kills me that the GPU isn't upgradeable on the base 27" iMac so I'm contemplating spending the extra $300 for the processor bump (which I don't need) and the 6970 (which I want).
There aren't any benchmarks for 6950M but there are plenty for 6970M. Since 6950M has just 100MHz (15%) lower clock speed, it's fairly easy to compare them. NotebookCheck's benchmarks show that 6970M is up to more than twice as fast as 4850M, even in gaming benchmarks. I would say performance gains vary between 70% and 110%. Subtract the 15% from that and we get 60% and 94%, so average of 77%.
6950M will sure be a huge upgrade from 4850M.
6970M appears to be around 40-45% (30-60% in various benchmarks) faster than 5850M. Again, subtract 15% and we get ~36%. Note: You must compare 5850M with GDDR5 since there are versions with DDR3 and GDDR3. Those are much slower.
There are only two significant GPU upgrades here, from the Mobility HD 4670 to the 6750M and the HD 5850M to the 6970M.Does anyone know how the 6770 on the base 27" compares to the 5750 on the high end 27" July 2010 model?
It kills me that the GPU isn't upgradeable on the base 27" iMac so I'm contemplating spending the extra $300 for the processor bump (which I don't need) and the 6970 (which I want).
You'll be waiting a long time for thatPerhaps if the Mac Pro gets updated soon, I'll order that one if it impresses me more.
I dunno, you tell me which is more likely to fit in the iMac case
This
![]()
or this
![]()
I have a 24" Dell monitor in a 2006 model Mac Pro with an ATI Radeon 4870 card.
Will this new iMac high end model have better graphics capabilities or not?
I would not compare the GPU die alone to the entire video card. You are still looking at the GPU itself plus the associated VRAM. It fits on a card.I dunno, you tell me which is more likely to fit in the iMac case
This
![]()
or this
![]()
Wow. So it looks like the GPU in the base 27" 2011 iMac is slightly better than the GPU in the ultimate 27" 2010 iMac?? If that is the case, I don't feel a need to upgrade to the 6970M.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-HD-6770M.43955.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5850.23069.0.html